Bug#755200: ITP missing for package libopenshot with RFS 755200

2014-10-04 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
According to [0], libopenshot has not its corresponding ITP bug. Please, could you file it? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Bug#755201: ITP missing for package libopenshot-audio with RFS 755201

2014-10-04 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
According to [0], libopenshot-audio has not its corresponding ITP bug. Please, could you file it? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU

2014-10-04 Thread Tobias Frost
PS: I forgot, there is a lintian informational warning which should be fixed: debian-news-entry-uses-asterisk Thanks! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#757180: ITP missing for package pw3270 with RFS 757180 with ITP in title

2014-10-04 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
According to [0], pw3270 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 757180 title. Please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU

2014-10-04 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: tags -1 pending Control: owner -1 ! Control: block 763888 by -1 # indicating that I will sponsor this package Hi Alexandre, On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 01:54 +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > Hi, > > > cruft is orphaned (#763888), so you dont do a NMU, as technically there > > is no maintaine

Bug#763540: Review of psocksxx/0.0.5-1

2014-10-04 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Hello, I have uploaded[1] a new version including the new upstream release. CU Jörg [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psocksxx/psocksxx_0.0.6-1.dsc -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Für

Bug#763513: RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP]

2014-10-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Please add .patch extensions to patch file names. What's the reason for commented out lines in debian/rules? Consider using debian/clean instead of override_dh_auto_clean target. You shouldn't override P tags. There are lintian messages: I: i2util source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyrigh

Bug#763512: RFS: bwctl/1.5.2+dfsg1-1

2014-10-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Please add .patch extensions to patch file names. You don't need debian/tmp/ prefixes in .manpages. Please don't use .default to control whether the daemon should be started. If you are unsure about something ask on the Debian resources, not wrote the questions into the packaging files (this is abo

Bug#763758: RFS: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-8

2014-10-04 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Hi Russ, In the past you sponsored the initial upload of my sblim-wbemcli package into Debian. I prepared a new revision of it with very few changes, could you please sponsor it again? https://mentors.debian.net/package/sblim-wbemcli -- Thanks, Feri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentor

Bug#763512: RFS: bwctl/1.5.2+dfsg1-1

2014-10-04 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andrey Rahmatullin , 2014-10-04, 17:29: You don't need debian/tmp/ prefixes in .manpages. You do need them. dh_installman doesn't look into debian/tmp; only dh_install does. That said, if the upstream build system puts the manpages in the correct location (which apparently is the case her

Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-10-04 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > I think that is important say you that I want help. However, the > source code is very strange because the upstream is ignoring the basic > rules. I submitted a patch to upstream adressing licensing issues : https://github.com/DesertBus/sockjs-twisted/pull/24 I'll wait a bit for this to be

Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-10-04 Thread Eriberto
Ok! Good luck! I will wait for you. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-10-04 11:08 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi : > Hi, > >> I think that is important say you that I want help. However, the >> source code is very strange because the upstream is ignoring the basic >> rules. > > I submitted a patch to upstream a

Re: upstream changes release zip

2014-10-04 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 07:08:06PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > hi, > > upstream Freeplane wants to replace the release zips/.tar.gzs because > they contain a freeplane-1.3.12_pre06/ instead of a freeplane-1.3.12/ > directory. The software will be re-compiled (md5 changes), but There > will be abs

Re: lintian overrides [Was: Bug#763540: Review of psocksxx/0.0.5-1]

2014-10-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > I have seen this before and I (as a maintainer) don't understand this > comment so bold as it is put here. I would say that overrides can help > you to see which items you (or your sponsee¹ in case of sponsorship) > already investigated. The po

Debug packages

2014-10-04 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Hello, a short question: Against which rules I violate, when no debug package is available? Thanks for your answer. CU Jörg > -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8S

Re: Debug packages

2014-10-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:44:10AM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > a short question: Against which rules I violate, when no debug package > is available? Debug packages are purely optional, so nothing. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature