> Hi Dariusz,
>
> somehow the d/copyright is still not matching 100% to the code...
> At least for many files there is a "Copyright (c) 2005-2009 Collecta,
> Inc" which is not in d/copyright. So probably this copyright owner is
> missing for the * rule. Can you please fix it.
Yes I fixed this.
Hello Stephen,
Hello Bastien,
Am Montag, den 15.09.2014, 22:59 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:28:54 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES
> wrote:
> > Le 14 sept. 2014 16:21, "Stephen Kitt" a écrit :
> > > Upgrading argyll does reveal a real problem though... Given tha
On 16.09.14 01:05:05, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Hi Dariusz,
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
> wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "raceintospace"
> >
> > * Package name
Hi Dariusz,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "raceintospace"
>
> * Package name: raceintospace
>Version : 1.1+dfsg1-1
>Upstream
Your message dated Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:53:20 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#761645: RFS: filezilla/3.9.0.5-1 -- Full-featured
graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client
has caused the Debian Bug report #761645,
regarding RFS: filezilla/3.9.0.5-0.1 -- Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP
cl
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
wrote:
> On 16.09.14 01:05:05, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> Hi Dariusz,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
>> wrote:
>> > Package: sponsorship-requests
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> >
>> > Dear mentors,
>> >
>> > I am look
Hi,
the package seqan currently in testing previously built on all
architectures except sparc (even on kfreebsd-*)[1]. I needed to
fix some onrelated build issue and now the recent build log on
kfreebsd[2] says:
...
cd /«BUILDDIR»/seqan-1.4.1+dfsg/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/core/demos &&
/usr/bin/
Hi,
On 16/09/14 10:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
> the package seqan currently in testing previously built on all
> architectures except sparc (even on kfreebsd-*)[1]. I needed to
> fix some onrelated build issue and now the recent build log on
> kfreebsd[2] says:
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/stat
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:49:08AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>
> On 16/09/14 10:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > the package seqan currently in testing previously built on all
> > architectures except sparc (even on kfreebsd-*)[1]. I needed to
> > fix some onrelated build issue and now th
Hi Steven,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:49:08AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=seqan&suite=jessie
>
> Huh? According to this it has _never_ built on kfreebsd:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=seqan&arch=kfreebsd-amd64
>
> (it
Hi wRAR,
You need analyze the package to understand my words. Pierre, the
maintainer, already understood and replied me.
Thanks for your help and attention.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-16 0:11 GMT-03:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:22:10PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
>> To put a
Hi Pierre,
Thanks for your fast reply. I will try help you.
1. d/changelog: please, use 'Initial release' instead of 'source
package automatically created by stdeb 0.6.0+git'.
2. d/control:
- Change the Priority from extra to optional[1].
- The upstream INSTALL file says that you must
Hi Jörg,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:26:04 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst
wrote:
> Am Montag, den 15.09.2014, 22:59 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> > Ah right, thanks, the last time I checked dpkg-maintscript-helper didn't
> > handle this case.
> >
> > Jörg, it's dpkg-maintscript-helper dir_to_symlink...
>
Thanks for your help. I have updated the package on mentors.
1. Done.
2.
- Done.
- Done.
- Done.
- My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
GitHub uses the same URL for browser and git clone, you should I still
fill both fields?
- You c
Hi Guys,
On 16/09/14 07:23, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> There are no indications that the package has been orphaned, so it
> likely hasn't.
>
In case your not aware, it seems the package has now been orphaned[1] as
of today (excellent work by Ricardo Mones).
Regards,
Daniel
[1] https://bugs.debi
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 09:07 +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> > Hi Dariusz,
> >
> > somehow the d/copyright is still not matching 100% to the code...
> > At least for many files there is a "Copyright (c) 2005-2009 Collecta,
> > Inc" which is not in d/copyright. So probably this copyright owne
Hello Forum,
I am wondering whether dh_auto_test works properly with Makefile generated via
automake.
For my current packaging, I observe that, during a debuild building,
dh_auto_test only
builds the test program (listed in check_PROGRAMS), but does not launch TESTS;
nevertheless, in hand mode,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello Forum,
This is actually a mailing list :)
> I am wondering whether dh_auto_test works properly with Makefile generated
> via automake.
It should work properly if upstream is doing things the usual way.
> For my current packaging,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:13:01PM +0200, Pierre Rudloff wrote:
> - My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
> GitHub uses the same URL for browser and git clone, you should I still fill
> both fields?
Of course, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-control
Hi,
when trying to upgrade the abyss packaging
(git://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/abyss.git) I realised that the test
framework which switched to gtest is not as easy to use in packaging as
I expected. According to README.Debian of libgtest-dev (which is in
line what Anthony wrote below) you ne
20 matches
Mail list logo
