Hi Tobias,
> Il Venerdì 5 Settembre 2014 8:46, Tobias Frost ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:36 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Hi Gianfranco,
>> >
>> > Well, amap has been previously been removed from Debian due to
> licesnse
>> > reasons. (Please see #346313
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Andreas Tille [2014-08-04 09:48 +0200]:
> > on arm*, powerpc, sparc and s390x architectures the build problem is:
> >
> > third_party/cpuid.h: In constructor 'Ebwt::
^^^
I worked around this part of the proble
Le vendredi 05 septembre 2014 à 13:35 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > +++ Andreas Tille [2014-08-04 09:48 +0200]:
>
> ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
> make[2]: *** [bowtie-build] Error 1
>
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:15:23PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
> > make[2]: *** [bowtie-build] Error 1
> >
> > The relevant line in the code is:
> >
> > $ grep -w -n asm e*
> > ebwt.h:1909:asm ("popcntq
2014-09-04 18:15 GMT-03:00 Marc Dietrich :
> Hi Eriberto,
Hi Marc,
>> 3. d/control: you need a VCS to control your packaging. I think that
>> already told you about it. Ask me if you have doubt.
>
> Yes, I original got it wrong thinking it must be the upstream repo. Since I
> have no repo for th
(This discussion started here[0], but I'm bringing it to a new thread
in hope it's seen by a wider range of people.)
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/09/msg00034.html
How to proper acknowledge a NMU? As described, I included the NMU
version changelog in debian/changelog after
Denis, you must use the #760198 (RFS) bug to ask, not #747700 (New
upstream version 20131230).
Denis, do you saw the message from Vincent Cheng saying about not use
NMU in this package?
I didn't found any new ircii package in mentors.d.o.
Eriberto
2014-09-05 8:28 GMT-03:00 Denis Rodrigues Ferr
Hi Marc,
On 05-09-14 16:29, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> Not mandatory or recommended by policy. However, a good practice
> commonly requested by all sponsors to allow the control of the code by
> you or any external people. You must implement it.
Just to be sure, I read this as "You must implement it
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:00:27PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:15:23PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
> > > make[2]: *** [bowtie-build] Error 1
> > >
> > > The relevant line in the code is:
Hi Paul,
2014-09-05 11:52 GMT-03:00 Paul Gevers :
>> Not mandatory or recommended by policy. However, a good practice
>> commonly requested by all sponsors to allow the control of the code by
>> you or any external people. You must implement it.
>
> Just to be sure, I read this as "You must implem
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 05:16:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
> > > > make[2]: *** [bowtie-build] Error 1
> > > >
> > > > The relevant line in the code is:
> > > >
> > > > $ grep -w -n asm e*
> > >
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:35:13PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 2. i386 results in
>
> ebwt.h: Assembler messages:
> ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
> ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
> ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid in
* Eduardo M KALINOWSKI , 2014-09-05, 14:48:
How to proper acknowledge a NMU? As described, I included the NMU
version changelog in debian/changelog after the new version I'm
preparing. From the devref, this appears to be all that's necessary, at
least in my interpretation.
Yes, from technical
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:35:13PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > 2. i386 results in
> >
> > ebwt.h: Assembler messages:
> > ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
> > ebwt.h:1909: Error: invali
Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:24:48 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: passwordsafe/0.93+dfsg-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #745126,
regarding RFS: passwordsafe/0.93+dfsg-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:24:47 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: django-ratelimit/0.4.0+8+gd58c489-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #756237,
regarding RFS: django-ratelimit/0.4.0+8+gd58c489-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Hello,
I searching a sponsor for pypuppetdb. It's a library needed for puppetboard a
Web
Interface for PuppetDB (ITP: #754796)
python-pypuppetdb is available at Mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/pypuppetdb
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pypuppetdb/pypuppetdb_0.1.1+git08
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:23:23PM +0200, Jonas Genannt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I searching a sponsor for pypuppetdb. It's a library needed for puppetboard a
> Web
> Interface for PuppetDB (ITP: #754796)
>
> python-pypuppetdb is available at Mentors:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/pypuppetdb
Hello Andrey,
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pypuppetdb/pypuppetdb_0.1.1+git080614-1.dsc
> >
> >
> > Could any dd please have a look?
> Please file a bug against sponsorship-requests next time.
yes sorry about that. will do it the next time!
>
> Upstream-Contact in d/copyrig
On 5. September 2014 10:14:56 MESZ, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>Hi Tobias,
>
>
>
>
>> Il Venerdì 5 Settembre 2014 8:46, Tobias Frost ha
>scritto:
>> > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:36 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Hi Gianfranco,
>>> >
>>> > Well, amap has been previousl
Hi Patrick,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:22:02AM -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> > > ebwt.h:1909:asm ("popcntq %[x],%[count]\n": [count]
> > "=&r" (count): [x] "r" (x));
> > Unless someone investigates why GCC on i386 doesn't know this instruction,
> > I suggest compiling with POPC
Well, I was kind of hoping upstream could do the heavy lifting here... :)
but yes, I can look at this.
Patrick
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:22:02AM -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> > > > ebwt.h:1909:asm ("po
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-privacy-please"
* Package name: pidgin-privacy-please
Version : 0.7.1-3
Upstream Author : Stefan Ott
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pidgin-privacy-please/
[Re-try again as my previous question ended up as "Message not available"
in the mail archive]
Please help me fix the lintian "hardening-no-relro" problem. As mentioned
before, I've tried several ways myself but none worked. I've uploaded the
source package to
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/p
24 matches
Mail list logo
