Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8
Hi everybody,
currently, policyd-weight is broken in unstable/testing due to recent
libnet-dns-perl upgrade,
technically speaking policyd-weight used Net::DNS::Packet function dh_expand()
which does not
exist anymore. This
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in
unstable/testing rc bug #752845)
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc
Sorry, right URL is, of course:
dget -x
http://mentor
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-as...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org,
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpl-plugin-muse".
* Package name: cpl-plugin-muse
Version : 0.18.
* Jakub Wilk , 2014-06-25, 21:35:
I put now GPL-2.0+ in debian/copyright
But that's not what upstream says. They say explicitly “version 2 only
of the License”.
Ping? I can't upload a package with incorrect d/copyright.
GCC emits these warnings:
crunch.c: In function 'main':
crunch.c:2999:5
I must prepare a new version of my package because of a transition.
however they are holding one package that my package depends on, out
of unstable because "that would start the transition". The package is
libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev
I want to be one jump ahead of them when they do do the transition.
On 28/06/14 20:37, Paul Elliott wrote:
> How do I get the one package that is not in unstable
> (libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev) into sbuild's list of packages for a
> test build?
>
I thought I'd seen this on the Debian sbuild wiki page... but alas it's
not there!
The only thing I was able to find was
On Jun 28, 2014, at 09:13 PM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>The only thing I was able to find was this-
>http://www.wefearchange.org/2011/09/sbuild-with-local-newer-dependencies.html
I still use that setup extensively, most recently while adding Python 3
support to a stack of zope.* and other packages.
>>I put now GPL-2.0+ in debian/copyright
>But that's not what upstream says. They say explicitly “version 2 only
>of the License”.
>Ping? I can't upload a package with incorrect d/copyright.
I put now GPL-2.0.
I was wrong because when I read:
>License: GPL-2.0
> This package is free software;
>I see that upstream explicitly throws away return value of some fgets(3)
>calls, but I don't think it's right. fgets() can fail, and such failure
>should not be ignored. Please nudge upstream about this problem.
You can be sure I nudge the upstream.
Regards,
--
Marcio Souza
pgpBuTPZej9pJ
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 04:23:49 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: klein/0.2.3-2 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #738191,
regarding RFS: klein/0.2.3-2 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
10 matches
Mail list logo
