Re: I would like to renew my request to delay the removal of maitreya from testing.

2014-06-25 Thread Olly Betts
[Cc-ing #749974 since that's the relevant bug] Thanks for your work on this, Paul. On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:40:15AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote: > BUT! I have just checked packages.debian.org and I find that > libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev which the new version of maitreya will depend on > is still in exp

Bug#750592: Urgently looking for sponsor

2014-06-25 Thread Benedict Verhegghe
Hi, I am urgently looking for a sponsor willing to help with uploading my packages. The old pyfomrex-0.8.6-4 packages currently in testing/sid (besides being obsolete) do not build anymore. See bug #750351. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750351 Anybody interested in helping me

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
24.06.2014 16:41, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lilyterm" > > Package name: lilyterm > Version : 0.9.9.4-1 > Upstream Author : Lu, Chao-Ming (Tetralet) > URL

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
[I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry!] * Michael Tokarev , 2014-06-25, 16:27: lilyterm - Light and eazy-to-use terminal emulator for X Typo: eazy -> easy why did you create lilyterm-data? Can't you just swallow it by main lilyterm package? You may need extra -data in two case

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread 陳昌倬
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 04:27:51PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Besides, why did you create lilyterm-data? Can't you just swallow > it by main lilyterm package? You may need extra -data in two cases -- > when that -data comes from a separate source, or when you have several > different variati

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
At Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:27:51 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > You may need extra -data in two cases -- when that -data comes from > a separate source, or when you have several different variations of > your term package (say, gtk2 and gtk3 versions) which all use a > common set of data files. Appar

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread 陳昌倬
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:20:46PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Michael Tokarev , 2014-06-25, 16:27: > >> lilyterm - Light and eazy-to-use terminal emulator for X > > Typo: eazy -> easy Thank for the review, just uploading a new one. > The third case (likely most common one) is when an arch:a

Bug#752690: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.40-1 [RC] -- financial accounting and ERP program

2014-06-25 Thread RJ Clay
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ledgersmb" * Package name: ledgersmb Version : 1.3.40-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:20:46PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > The third case (likely most common one) is when an arch:any > > package would otherwise contain huge /usr/share. Which doesn't > > seem to be the case here either. > > Actually this is the reason for lily

Bug#747816: RFS: openalpr - libopenalpr1

2014-06-25 Thread Stefan Bauer
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Gesendet:So 11.05.2014 21:34 Betreff:Bug#747816: RFS: openalpr - libopenalpr1 An:sub...@bugs.debian.org; >   Dear mentors, > >   I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "openalpr" Ping.   Stefan

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Yavor Doganov , 2014-06-25, 19:02: Lintian issues a warning if the data in /usr/share is more than 4 MB or more than 2 MB *and* more than 50% of the package. It is not the case for your package so splitting it does more harm than good, IMO. Aye, lilyterm-data is only 76K. Even when multipli

Bug#751534: RFS: crunch/3.6-1 [ITP] -- tool for creating wordlist

2014-06-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Marcio de Souza Oliveira , 2014-06-20, 19:12: I: Crunch: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/crunch.1.gz: 75 I changed the description to: Description: Added backslash before the hyphen option -s at line 75 That's better. But let's remove “at line 75”. :-) I changed the name of

Bug#752690: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.40-1 [RC] -- financial accounting and ERP program

2014-06-25 Thread RJ Clay
severity -1 important submitter -1 Robert James Clay tags 749347 + pending block 749347 by 752690 thanks Sorry; accidentally sent a draft instead of the final... On 06/25/2014 11:48 AM, RJ Clay wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new pac

Bug#752729: RFS: djvusmooth/0.2.14-2 -- (Python-apps) graphical editor for DjVu

2014-06-25 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi people, I'm looking for an uploader for my new package of Djvusmooth. There are only minor changes and it appears to be Lintian clean. Mentors upload: http://mentors.debian.net/package/djvusmooth http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/djvus

Bug#751534: RFS: crunch/3.6-1 [ITP] -- tool for creating wordlist

2014-06-25 Thread Marcio de Souza Oliveira
>That's better. But let's remove “at line 75”. Removed. >I found more misspellings: >exponentail -> exponential >swedish -> Swedish >outout -> output >supress -> suppress >varible -> variable >calcualated -> calculated >gernerate -> generate >explaination -> explanation >recommneds -> recommends

Bug#752027: marked as done (RFS: ocrodjvu/0.7.18-1 -- (Python-apps) tool to perform OCR on DjVu documents)

2014-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:17:34 -0700 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#752027: RFS: ocrodjvu/0.7.18-1 -- (Python-apps) tool to perform OCR on DjVu documents has caused the Debian Bug report #752027, regarding RFS: ocrodjvu/0.7.18-1 -- (Python-apps) tool to perform OCR on DjV