Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bitcoin-armory"
* Package name: bitcoin-armory
Version : 0.91.1-1
Upstream Author : Armory Technologies, Inc.
* URL : https://bitcoinarmory.com/
* License
Hi,
I uploaded a newer version 0.9.1-5 that fixes most of the
errors/warnings reported by lintian.
The debian-watch-file-pubkey-file-is-missing error remains, although
debian/upload/signing-key.asc is included. Testing with uscan worked
correctly. Possibly a bug in lintian?
To access further
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Benedict Verhegghe wrote:
> The debian-watch-file-pubkey-file-is-missing error remains, although
> debian/upload/signing-key.asc is included. Testing with uscan worked
> correctly. Possibly a bug in lintian?
Wrong path, uscan/lintian look at debian/upstream/signin
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Benedict Verhegghe wrote:
> Oops, that was a typo in my mail. The key is really in
> debian/upstream/signing-key.asc
Testing it locally I don't get the lintian warning you mentioned with
lintian 2.5.22.1.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UN
Oops, that was a typo in my mail. The key is really in
debian/upstream/signing-key.asc
tar tzf pyformex_0.9.1-5.debian.tar.gz:
debian/
debian/changelog
debian/menu
debian/pyformex.manpages
debian/compat
debian/pyformex.doc-base
debian/source/
debian/source/format
debian/pyformex-extra.manpages
deb
Yes, locally lintian also did not give me a problem. But after uploading
to mentors an error is displayed.
Maybe the uscan version on mentors is older and does not yet accept the
asc key format?
On 06/05/2014 05:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> Testing it locally I don't get the lintian warning you m
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "buildnotify"
* Package name: buildnotify
Version : 0.3.5-1
Upstream Author : Anay Nayak
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/Anay/buildnotify
* License : G
Hello,
a bug has been reported[1] against a package I maintain in Debian. It is said
that one of the binary packages
recommends Udisks, which is deprecated for a while now, and I should move to
Udisks2. The problem is that:
1. bilibop-rules already works fine with udisks2; in fact it works fine
Oops, sorry:
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/750507
message d'origine
De: "bilibop project"
A: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Sujet: Help needed about deprecated dependency
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 18:20:13 +0200
> a bug has been reported[1] against a package I maintain in Debian. It
Your message dated Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:23:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: meson/0.17.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #712610,
regarding RFS: meson/0.17.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 18:20:13 +0200, "bilibop project"
wrote:
> a bug has been reported[1] against a package I maintain in Debian. It is
> said that one of the binary packages recommends Udisks, which is deprecated
> for a while now, and I should move to Udisks2. The problem is that:
The bug w
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Benedict Verhegghe wrote:
> Yes, locally lintian also did not give me a problem. But after uploading
> to mentors an error is displayed.
> Maybe the uscan version on mentors is older and does not yet accept the
> asc key format?
Correct, thanks for the pointer, I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "audiotools":
* Package name: audiotools
Version : 2.21-3
Upstream Author : Brian Langenberger
* URL : http://audiotools.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 19:38 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> ieee-data installs the file in the 4th place
My mistake, I didn't see that it installs a symlink there.
> As commented on my previous reply, the package don't installs
> airoscript-ng.
Yeah, that was mainly for forwarding up
14 matches
Mail list logo
