-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-05-06 20:16, Nicolas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the package swiftmailer that is
> already in debian. Upstream delivered a new release. There's no
> major changes in debian packaging. I can build the package and
> l
>
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for the package swiftmailer that is
> > already in debian. Upstream delivered a new release. There's no
> > major changes in debian packaging. I can build the package and
> > lintian did not complain
>
> so why did you change dh compat-level from 8 to 9 then?
>
>
I d
Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.4-1
of my package "cl-launch".
It builds these binary packages:
cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found o
* Giulio Paci , 2013-05-11, 17:04:
git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/opengrm-ngram.git
I can't build the package, because it build-depends on automake1.13,
which was removed in the mean time.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Faré writes:
> Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.4-1
> of my package "cl-launch".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean
Dear mentors,
I have taken over the debian packaging for ASDF from Fare. We have just
released version 3.1.2, and I have put the package up using dput. Note
that I am a novice at this, so it's quite likely I have gotten something
wrong.
This brand new ASDF release has received a lot of testing,
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Faré writes:
>> Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.4-1
>> of my package "cl-launch".
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Li
Hi all,
I've got a package here that supports both Cmake and automake
configurations. How do I force the builder to use CMake in
debian/rules?
Cheers,
Nico
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Hi Nico,
On 08/05/14 16:21, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a package here that supports both Cmake and automake
> configurations. How do I force the builder to use CMake in
> debian/rules?
>
From experimenting with a package very similar to the scenario your in I
found the followin
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ckeditor"
* Package name: ckeditor
Version : 4.3.5+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* License : GPL-2+ or MPL-1.1+ or LGPL-2.1+
That works, thanks Daniel!
--Nico
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> On 08/05/14 16:21, Nico Schlömer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've got a package here that supports both Cmake and automake
>> configurations. How do I force the builder to use CMake in
>> debian/ru
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgdal-grass"
Package name: libgdal-grass
Version : 1.11.0-1~exp1
Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam ,
Radim Blazek
URL : http://www.gdal.org/
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ckeditor"
>
> * Package name: ckeditor
>Version : 4.3.5+dfsg1-1
>Upstrea
13 matches
Mail list logo
