Bug#746369: AW: Bug#746369: RFS: downtimed/0.6.2

2014-05-01 Thread Stefan Bauer
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:Cameron Norman > One thing I noticed is that upstream has an Upstart job, but you are not > shipping it. Simply making a symlink from debian/downtimed.upstart to > startup-scripts/upstart-startup.conf should do the trick. Updated package is present on m

Re: git-buildpackage python3, python3.4: not found

2014-05-01 Thread Daniel James
Hi Alex, >> Maybe Alex is not using an autobuilder so needs to install python3-all >> manually on the build machine? I'm glad to hear your package build is now working :-) > Not sure what autobuilder is , but I use a minimal base system and > recently have updated it. I meant any system which w

Can't push new mcron package to FTP

2014-05-01 Thread Dale Mellor
Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while since I last did this... can someone help me please? Thanks, Dale. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signe

Can't push new mcron package to FTP

2014-05-01 Thread dale_mellor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while since I last did this... can someone help me please? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR

Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP

2014-05-01 Thread Eric L.
Hi, On 01/05/14 18:41, Dale Mellor wrote: Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while since I last did this... can someone help me please? To which FTP server? Usi

Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP

2014-05-01 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
This is a question for the ftpteam, but here's the reason why:: Apr 29 14:22:47 processing /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes Apr 29 14:22:47 GnuPG signature check failed on mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes Apr 29 14:22:47 /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature! Apr 29 14:22:47 Removing /mcron

RFS: libcdio 0.92

2014-05-01 Thread Eric Shattow
libcdio (GPL) is stuck at an outdated version 0.83 in Debian New packaging exists for upstream release 0.92: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdio libcdio authors request to get the upstream release packaged and sponsored and landed in Debian because package Maintainer is absent for two year

Re: RFS: libcdio 0.92

2014-05-01 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Eric Shattow wrote: > libcdio (GPL) is stuck at an outdated version 0.83 in Debian > > New packaging exists for upstream release 0.92: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdio > > libcdio authors request to get the upstream release packaged and sponsored > and

Re: RFS: libcdio 0.92

2014-05-01 Thread Eric Shattow
Will do, have contacted MIA team. Eric

Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP

2014-05-01 Thread Dale Mellor
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 19:37 +0200, Eric L. wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/05/14 18:41, Dale Mellor wrote: > > Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of > > mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about > > it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while > > since I

Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP

2014-05-01 Thread Dale Mellor
Ah right, now I see the problem. Thanks for the hint about the FTP team. Most likely my key is not, in fact, in the keyring, so my question to the mentors' list is, will somebody help me put the new release through please? It is needed w.r.t. bug #746006, and its release is holding up the upgrad

Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP

2014-05-01 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Dale Mellor wrote: > Ah right, now I see the problem. Thanks for the hint about the FTP > team. Most likely my key is not, in fact, in the keyring, so my > question to the mentors' list is, will somebody help me put the new > release through please? It is needed

Bug#746620: RFS: sxiv/1.2-1

2014-05-01 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sxiv" * Package name: sxiv * Version : 1.2-1 * Upstream Author : Bert Münnich * URL : https://github.com/muennich/sxiv * License : GPL-2.0+ Section

Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP

2014-05-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Dale Mellor wrote: >Is this person always this condescending or am I being bullied? As far as I can tell there was neither condescension nor bullying in the mail by Eric, he was simply asking for some more information that he wasn't able to determine from your

Bug#746184: marked as done (RFS: gcc-4.9-doc/4.9.0-1 [ITP])

2014-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 May 2014 04:23:55 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gcc-4.9-doc/4.9.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #746184, regarding RFS: gcc-4.9-doc/4.9.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#746620: RFS: sxiv/1.2-1

2014-05-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Daniel Echeverry , 2014-05-01, 20:21: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_1.2-1.dsc There's something wrong with the changelog. It includes entries for 1.1-1 and 1.1-2, which were never uploaded AFAICT; but OTOH it doesn't include entries for 1.1.1-1 and 1.1.1-2, which th

Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP

2014-05-01 Thread Eric L.
Hi, On 2 May 2014 03:59:15 CEST, Paul Wise wrote: >On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Dale Mellor wrote: > >>Is this person always this condescending or am I being bullied? > >As far as I can tell there was neither condescension nor bullying in >the mail by Eric, he was simply asking for some mo