Re: path of config-files & logs - special case - package sbnc

2014-03-06 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wednesday 05 March 2014 20:42:29 Stefan Bauer wrote: > The old patches are changing the path for log files and configuration-files > hardcoded to /var/log and /etc. Which is correct if sbnc is run as a daemon (may be as root). > As this binary can run individually by > different users, there s

Compiling features to a package

2014-03-06 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
Dear Mentors, So I maintain zmap package. It can be compiled with json and redis support. What is the policy to handle this ? Should I compile all possible (reasonable) extensions to a package? Should I create a second binary package, say: zmap-redis with redis support compiled in ? For now I th

Re: Compiling features to a package

2014-03-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:21:58AM +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > So I maintain zmap package. It can be compiled with json and redis > support. What is the policy to handle this ? Should I compile all > possible (reasonable) extensions to a package? Yes. > Should I create

Bug#740934: RFS: zmap/1.1.2-2

2014-03-06 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zmap" * Package name: zmap Version : 1.1.2-2 Upstream Author : Zakir Durumeric , J. Alex Halderman , Eric Wustrow , David Adrian , HD Moore * URL : https

Re: Sponsor for haxe package maintaining

2014-03-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Bo Lorentsen wrote: > Hi ... > > I have been building haxe locally for a while now, on both stable and > testing (and have been using Debian as a developer for more than 10 years), > and I really would like to try maintaining the haxe package, as it need some > atte

Bug#735772: marked as done (RFS: sockjs-client/0.3.4+dfsg-1 [ITP #733821])

2014-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:29:07 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sockjs-client/0.3.4+dfsg-1 [ITP #733821] has caused the Debian Bug report #735772, regarding RFS: sockjs-client/0.3.4+dfsg-1 [ITP #733821] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#740934: RFS: zmap/1.1.2-2

2014-03-06 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zmap" > > * Package name: zmap >Version : 1.1.2-2 >Upstream Author : Zakir Durumeric , J. Alex Ha

Bug#740934: RFS: zmap/1.1.2-2

2014-03-06 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
On 06.03.14 09:46:46, Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski > wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zmap" > > > > * Package name: zmap > >Version

Bug#740934: marked as done (RFS: zmap/1.1.2-2)

2014-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:32:07 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#740934: RFS: zmap/1.1.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #740934, regarding RFS: zmap/1.1.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Re: Weird conffile case

2014-03-06 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
On 04.03.14 08:58:58, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Monday 03 March 2014 17:56:38 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > > The part "undo damage" I do not understand. From what I understand > > dpkg compares the new config with the existing one. So to upgrade from > > stable properly I would have to replace

Bug#740915: marked as done (RFS: pentobi/8.0-1)

2014-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:36:36 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#740915: RFS: pentobi/8.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #740915, regarding RFS: pentobi/8.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Re: Sponsor for haxe package maintaining

2014-03-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mar 6, 2014 10:16 PM, "Bo Lorentsen" wrote: > > On 03/06/2014 05:01 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> >> Need I sign this mail using a gpg signature ? or is it ok just to ask ? >> The process is quite "harder" than that, nothing difficult, though :) > > Ok, thanks for the pointer, it is a bit confus

Bug#740982: RFS: liblas/1.7.0+dfsg-5

2014-03-06 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liblas" now that it can be built again with the new boost1.54 in unstable fixing #739904 that caused FTBFS on kfreebsd-*. Package name: liblas Version : 1.7.0+dfsg-5 Upstream Au

Bug#740442: RFS: par2cmdline/0.6.5-1 [ITA] -- PAR 2.0 compatible file verification and repair tool

2014-03-06 Thread Nicholas Breen
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 03:08:20PM +0100, JCF Ploemen wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for "par2cmdline": [snip] > * Update build-deps: > + Add dh-autoreconf, automake1.11. Does it require automake 1.11 specifically

Bug#719801: marked as done (RFS: roundup/1.5.0-1)

2014-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 07 Mar 2014 04:27:01 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: roundup/1.5.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #719801, regarding RFS: roundup/1.5.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#740982: liblas does not build

2014-03-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, I have problems building your latest prepared version of liblas: ... [ 2%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/las.dir/detail/index/indexoutput.cpp.o cd /tmp/buildd/liblas-1.7.0+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src && /usr/bin/c++ -DHAVE_GDAL=1 -DHAVE_LIBGEOTIFF=1 -Dlas_EXPORTS -g -O2 -fstack