Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-01 Thread Martin Ueding
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "think-rotate" * Package name: think-rotate Version : 3.0-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]

Bug#731036: (no subject)

2013-12-01 Thread Martin Ueding
I am sorry that I forgot to fill in the table. Here it is: * Package name: think-rotate Version : 3.0-1 Upstream Author : Martin Ueding * URL : http://martin-ueding.de/en/projects/think-rotate/ * License : GPL v2 or later Section : utils -- http://m

locale patch

2013-12-01 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
I've received a patch about one of my packages, that apparently doesn't work when using a non-utf locale. Do you think I should consider the patch or no? -- Salvo Tomaselli http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: locale patch

2013-12-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Salvo Tomaselli > Do you think I should consider the patch or no? Depends on the patch and the package, please include details when asking questions. I would suggest neither option; instead, fix the patch and then accept it. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/

Bug#729354: [SoB] Re: RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE

2013-12-01 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
> > Ok, done (grabbed from the nlopt package). > > OK (not brave enough to try the new uscan which would have saved you > from this get-orig-source thingy by adding a single line to d/copyright? What are you talking about? > Yep. BTW, config model (see below) would have changed to 3.9.4 > autom

Bug#731068: RFS: pyformex/0.9.1-2

2013-12-01 Thread Benedict Verhegghe
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "pyformex". * Package name: pyformex Version : 0.9.1-2 Upstream Author : benedict.verheg...@ugent.be * URL : pyformex.org * License : GPL3 This is an up

Bug#716708: marked as done (RFS: hunspell-bo/0.1-1 [ITP])

2013-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2013 16:28:07 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: hunspell-bo/0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #716708, regarding RFS: hunspell-bo/0.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

packaging review (lintian clean)

2013-12-01 Thread Robert Ames
Hello all, Could I get a packaging review? My first time building/bundling a script for debian (debian-native) and I want to make sure I get the "right advice" on a few points: 1) Is the use of tempfile here correct? (is this properly secure / policy compliant? should it be in /var/run? b

Bug#712982: RFS: peg/0.1.11-1 -- recursive-descent parser generators for C

2013-12-01 Thread Giulio Paci
Il 30/11/2013 17:22, Jakub Wilk ha scritto: > * Giulio Paci , 2013-11-29, 17:13: >>> What do you mean by "Drop manpages"? >> I dropped the manpages file. Do you think is ok to rephrase the entry as >> "Drop manpages file"? > > I'd write something akin "Drop debian/manpages. Upstream makefile now

packaging perl programs

2013-12-01 Thread T o n g
Hi, I want to pack a simple perl script (http://proxytunnel.sourceforge.net/ files/pixelserv.pl.txt) as a package, but need your help. I've checked out the Debian Perl Policy http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/perl-policy/ and believe the script is fine. But I don't know if there

re: packaging perl programs

2013-12-01 Thread Robert Ames
> I want to pack a simple perl script (http://proxytunnel.sourceforge.net/ > files/pixelserv.pl.txt) as a package, but need your help. You should have a close read of the Debian Policy Manual: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ ...specifically: Section 10.7 "Configuration Files" which su

Bug#729354: [SoB] Re: RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE

2013-12-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 07:19:51PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: > > > Ok, done (grabbed from the nlopt package). > > > > OK (not brave enough to try the new uscan which would have saved you > > from this get-orig-source thingy by adding a single line to d/copyright? > > What are you talking a

Bug#729354: [SoB] Re: RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE

2013-12-01 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:23:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > What are you talking about? > I think I've recommendet you reading > https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements Indeed, I've forgot this reference. But it seems, this out of the dep5 standard for now, isn't? And this approach

Re: packaging review (lintian clean)

2013-12-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Robert Ames wrote: > 1) Is the use of tempfile here correct? (is this properly secure / policy > compliant? should it be in /var/run? but /var/run requires permissions > issues) The manual page for tempfile says that it is deprecated in favour of mktemp. Otherwi

Bug#729323: marked as done (RFS: syfi/1.0.0.dfsg-1.2 [NMU RC])

2013-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:25:33 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: syfi/1.0.0.dfsg-1.2 [NMU RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #729323, regarding RFS: syfi/1.0.0.dfsg-1.2 [NMU RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#729354: [SoB] Re: RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE

2013-12-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:18:31AM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:23:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > What are you talking about? > > I think I've recommendet you reading > > https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements > > Indeed, I've forgot this reference.