On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Bill Blough wrote:
> I had an upload rejected due to a signing key issue. I fixed that (I
> think), then rebuilt, re-signed, and re-uploaded the package.
I would either dput -f just in case. What is the exact message you are
getting when uploading ?
--
To UNSU
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre writes:
>
>> On of my upload was recently rejected. The reason was that an icon
>> file generated using Adobe did contained a copyright statement:
>
>> $ apt-get source pixelmed-java
>> $ strings ./com/pixelmed/web/favicon
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:40:48AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I would either dput -f just in case. What is the exact message you are
> getting when uploading ?
If I don't wait long enough between uploads, then it errors because the
files are still in the upload directory. But I stumbled ac
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Bill Blough wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:40:48AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> I would either dput -f just in case. What is the exact message you are
>> getting when uploading ?
>
> If I don't wait long enough between uploads, then it errors because th
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:38:37AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> You could:
>
> $ dcut --input xalan_1.11-2_source.changes
>
> If you do not want to wait another 6 hours.
I've tried that before and can't seem to get it to work. I *think* that
by not specifying mentors as the host it defa
Hi,
On 18.07.2013 10:38, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> You could:
>
> $ dcut --input xalan_1.11-2_source.changes
mentors does not support dcut as it does not run debianqueued
Bill, your package was rejected in lack of a signature. You should have
gotten that by mail, too:
2013-07-16 + 02:09:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:08:28AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Bill, your package was rejected in lack of a signature. You should have
> gotten that by mail, too:
>
> 2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,380 ERROR [debexpo.importer.26427] Rejected:
> Your upload does not contain a valid signature. Output was:
Hi Anton,
Problem is, I don't understand how much these rules apply to me, since
the actual upload to unstable will not be done by me. That case is
not covered by the text.
It does not matter, who "physically" uploads the package e.g. sponsors it.
In this case you are the author of changes.
Hi Oliver,
i do not really have any motivation to discuss
"social" questions any more. You want to upload
a newer version without intend to maintain it. Right?
2013/7/18 Oliver Sander :
> Hi Anton,
>
>
>>> Problem is, I don't understand how much these rules apply to me, since
>>> the actual uploa
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am maintainer of ppa repository for package "curseofwar" and looking
for a sponsor
* Package name: curseofwar
Version : 1.1.4-1
Upstream Author : Alexey Nikolaev
* URL : https://github.com
2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,196 DEBUG [debexpo.importer.26427] Determining
> user from 'Changed-By:' field: William Blough
> 2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,196 DEBUG [debexpo.importer.26427]
> Changed-By's email address is: de...@blough.us
> 2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,380 ERROR [debexpo.importer.26427] R
[trying to post in text]
> > >Hard to say without seeing your debian/ folder.
> >
> > Right here:
> >
> > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/pamsshagentauth/pam_ssh_agent_auth/v0.9.5/pam_ssh_agent_auth-0.9.5.tar.bz2
>
> Don't ask us why some 3rd party packages don't build properly, it's
>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:28:31AM -0700, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Don't ask us why some 3rd party packages don't build properly, it's
> > expected. If you have actual questions about actual problems you
> > encountered when trying to make a proper package ask them.
> I have a different view on that.
>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:54:50AM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> > i have the same problem when i upload a sources.. so then what i suppost
> to do?
You need to upload your public key on the "My Account" page of the
mentors website. And you need to sign your package using your private
key.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:46:19AM -0400, Bill Blough wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:08:28AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> > Bill, your package was rejected in lack of a signature. You should have
> > gotten that by mail, too:
> >
> > 2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,380 ERROR [debexpo.importer.26427] R
According to [0], curseofwar has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 717262
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pdfcube"
* Package name: pdfcube
Version : 0.0.5-1
Upstream Author : Mirko Maischberger
* URL : http://code.100allora.it/pdfcube/
* License : GPL-2.0+
Sec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I uploaded a new version to mentors:
libpar2 (0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New Upstream Release:
- Soname bump due to ABI change
- Doesn't fail to rename files with long names
- Doesn't crash when given a directory to work with
* de
Hi,
message d'origine
De: Bill Blough
A: Arno Töll
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Sujet: Re: mentors.d.n upload issues
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:26:08 -0400
> Also, as another data point - I was able to upload a *different* package
> with no problems, and even received an e
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:49:52 +0300, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Yes, but pay attention, NMU is only for critical bug-fixes. Not for
> new versions or minor changes. See Debian Policy.
That's not correct.
I admit that
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu
is not totally
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:38:33PM +0200, bilibop project wrote:
> Not sure the answer to this question can solve the issue, but:
> Are you trying to upload the same package with the same version number ?
No, the current version was a -1 release and I've been trying to upload
a -2 release.
sign
Hello,
I'm facing a problem with two packages that are blocked from migrating into
testing. I'm having trouble seeing a clear path forward and I wonder if anyone
could point me in a better direction.
The specific packages are ltt-control[1] and ust[2]. If the source packages
only built a single
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:08:50 -0700, Bill Blough wrote:
I emailed support@mentors.d.n about this, but I since I haven't heard
back (and I have no idea how often that email queue is checked), I
figured I'd check here and see if anyone has suggestions.
Here's the short(-ish) version:
I had an up
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 23:19:10 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> If they provide a debian directory, that means to me that they have
>> done their best to make sure their software can at least be packed into
>> a Debian binary package in the limited Debian environment that they
>> choose to test.
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:17:49 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 17-07-13 20:30, Tong Sun wrote:
>>
>>
>> Re: Empty binary package
>>
>>
>>> I'm wondering why the binary package built from my source package is
>>> empty.
Here is what I've discovered so far:
- If I unpack the ups
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am maintainer of ppa repository for package "curseofwar" and looking for
a sponsor
* Package name: curseofwar
Version : 1.1.4-1
Upstream Author : Alexey Nikolaev
* URL : https://github.com
Thank you for your pay attention on that.
I made a new letter:
From: Anton Balashov
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: curseofwar/1.1.4-1
With the same text.
Is that right?
2013/7/18 Mònica Ramírez
> According to [0], curseofwar has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
> 717262 tit
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:02:46AM +, T o n g wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 23:19:10 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> >> If they provide a debian directory, that means to me that they have
> >> done their best to make sure their software can at least be packed into
> >> a Debian binary pack
Ltt-controls has not been built on all archs (those out of date messages on the
PTS). Seems that there are build deps not available.
(Take a look at the buildds status page)
Jon Bernard schrieb:
>Hello,
>
>I'm facing a problem with two packages that are blocked from migrating
>into
>testing.
On 19-07-13 05:13, T o n g wrote:
> As said in OP,
Which I don't have anymore, so indeed please repeat it if you want my help.
> - I unpack the upstream tarball and build the binary debian package with
> 'debuild -us -uc'. the build is good.
Why do this debuild -us -uc first if you proceed wit
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:59:56PM -0700, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:08:50 -0700, Bill Blough wrote:
>
> That bit me too days ago. I just incremented the Debian version and
> uploaded the new version. That worked.
It's been worked around for now. I guess I'll see what happe
31 matches
Mail list logo
