Le 14/06/2013 08:50, Thomas Moulard a écrit :
> Dear all,
> the ViSP[1] software I maintain is causing GCC[2,3] and Doxygen[4] to crash
> on some platforms.
>
> It is difficult for me to fix or to report these issues as:
> 1. I am neither a DD or a DM,
> 2. I do not have access to these architectu
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Thomas Moulard
wrote:
> Dear all,
> the ViSP[1] software I maintain is causing GCC[2,3] and Doxygen[4] to crash
> on some platforms.
[snip]
In addition to everything Thibaut mentioned, you also have the option
of asking for your package to be rebuilt on the build
Hi Debian Mentors,
The reviewer comments' have been processed into the new version of the
package. New package uploaded and is pending another review and
sponsorship. Note that the package was built on amd64 architecture, because
that is the only 'sid' distro I have access to these days.
Let me k
Hi,
Am Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:05:38 +0200
schrieb kardan :
> I tried to compile scantailor and am stuck with zlib1g.
> Could not find zlib headers.
I solved this, by reinstalling the package. Obviously the header file
has been lost on the disk.
Now there is another issue with boost.
$ cmake .
--
> Now there is another issue with boost.
>
> $ cmake .
> -- Boost version: 1.49.0
> -- Could NOT find Boost
> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:297 (MESSAGE):
> Could not find boost headers or libraries.
>
> You may need to install a package named libboost1.35-dev or similarly.
>
> ii libboost-de
Hi Martin,
thanks for your answer.
Am Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:49:59 +0200
schrieb Martin Eberhard Schauer :
> My POV is: As you already found the error (line 295), your conclusion
> is wrong. You have 1.49.0.1, but cmake searches for 1.35.
You are right and I am confused. Boost has already been foun
Hi Kardan,
I should have looked at 712056 before my answer. But as I did some C
programming in the past, I thought that I understood the problem and
"Hey, this one is easy to solve" :-(
> I would like to help. In this case the package is already RFS and I
> think repackaging it would be counterp
>> My POV is: As you already found the error (line 295), your conclusion
>> is wrong. You have 1.49.0.1, but cmake searches for 1.35.
My POV is wrong :( (see below)
> $ grep -n -i boost CMakeLists.txt
> 74:INCLUDE(FindBoost)
> 152:FILE(GLOB boost_dirs1 "${build_outer_dir}/boost_1_[0-9]*_[0-9]*")
Hi,
Am Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:03:51 +0200
schrieb Martin Eberhard Schauer :
> I should have looked at 712056 before my answer. But as I did some C
> programming in the past, I thought that I understood the problem and
> "Hey, this one is easy to solve" :-(
> 1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Hey Martin,
one last thing from me on this. Thanks for the fun and the help!
> the problem is the incompatibility between the upstream code (above)
> and the Debian version - 1.49.0 vs 1.49.0.1.
Thanks to the maintainer everything is fine with boost (for this).
Am Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:36:10 +020
Dear mentors,
I seek an interim sponsor that can upload the packages dov4l and
setpwc. I have a sponsor but he is rather busy with stuff other than
Debian at the moment.
It would be good if these packages are uploaded as it would close
critical bugs (build dependency on the long deprecated dbs).
Hi,
I'm completing in ITA via the packing and upload of the new upstream
release for s3cmd. I use this tool daily to keep my local files and Amazon
S3 backup in sync.
I've been using Debian since the release of sarge. For the last year I've
been wanting to help in the Debian project. When I saw t
12 matches
Mail list logo
