Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The current mytop package is pretty old and the package was set to O
some days ago. I've recreated the package with the latest upstream
version available, checked and applied if necessary the debian patches
from the old debian pack
Il 09/04/2013 12:59, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
> Lintian emits:
> X: libmitlm0: shlib-calls-exit usr/lib/libmitlm.so.0.0.0
>
> I believe this is true-positive. exit() is indeed called in some methods that
> are part of public API:
>
> NgramLM::Initialize
> NgramModel::LoadComputedFeatures
>
> They
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:40:31AM +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
Hi,
> * URL : http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/mytop/
Unreachable from here currently, when have you reached that site the
last time?
> * Checked and recreated patchs from old upstream against new version
> - Add 01_fi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xboxdrv"
* Package name: xboxdrv
Version : 0.8.5-1
Upstream Author : Ingo Ruhnke
* URL : http://pingus.seul.org/~grumbel/xboxdrv/
* License : GPL-
Hi Andrey,
I would sponsor your package, but it seems, md5sum of your tarball is not
the same as of original one. Did you repack it?
Thanks,
Anton
2013/5/5 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "calcelestial"
Package name: calcelestial
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Steffen Vogel
URL : https://github.com/stv0g/calcelestial
License : GPL
Secti
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "exactimage"
* Package name: exactimage
Version : 0.8.8-1
Upstream Author : Rene Rebe
* URL : http://dl.exactcode.de/oss/exact-image/
* License : GPL-2
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> I would sponsor your package, but it seems, md5sum of your tarball is not
> the same as of original one. Did you repack it?
I didn't repack it, I generated the tarball from the upstream git tag.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Descripti
Hi,
recreated an uploaded the package due to some more reported bugs which have
been addressed by
the new upstream version.
* New upstream release (Closes: #590505, #538164, #565759, #558100,
#500078)
* New Maintainer (Closes: #704450)
* Updating standards version to 3.9.4
* Switch
On Sunday 05 May 2013 18:16:26 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Do you need a sponsor ?
Yes, I am searching for a sponsor:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
[...]
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "exactimage"
I am a Debian Maintainer, but my only upload was the ITA-
Hi,
>> * URL : http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/mytop/
>
> Unreachable from here currently, when have you reached that site the
> last time?
Yesterday as I started with the package yesterday and downloaded the
sources from there.
> Uh fun to review ... I find the naming of patch 10 a bi
Your message dated Sun, 05 May 2013 16:22:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: fadecut/0.1.3-1 (post Wheezy RFS)
has caused the Debian Bug report #703693,
regarding RFS: fadecut/0.1.3-1 (post Wheezy RFS)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
On 05/05/2013 05:04 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> I would sponsor your package, but it seems, md5sum of your tarball is not
>> the same as of original one. Did you repack it?
> I didn't repack it, I generated the tarball from the up
Sorry, forgot to mention. I used an original tarball from the upstream's
website. There are no differences between yours and original's one. Only
md5sum was different.
Cheers,
Anton
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 05 May 2013 16:46:30 +0200, Steffen Vogel wrote:
> Package name: calcelestial
> Version : 0.3-1
> Upstream Author : Steffen Vogel
> URL : https://github.com/stv0g/calcelestial
> License : GPL
> Section : utils
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.d
Your message dated Sun, 05 May 2013 19:22:41 +0200
with message-id <51869561.1060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706858: RFS: xboxdrv/0.8.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706858,
regarding RFS: xboxdrv/0.8.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi,
I'm rewriting the "old" debian/rules file and will let you know as soon
as there is an updated version on mentors.
best,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://
Hello,
I'm in the process of converting "my" packages into the canonical
copyright format[1]. I believe I understood the syntax and standard
licenses like GPL are no problem.
However, I have several non standard licenses, like [2], [3], [4] with
some files from the FSF having a very restrictive li
Hi,
I've the mentioned modifications and moved most of the stuff in debian/rules
from the old
manual way to debhelper functins where possible. See the new changelog entry:
* New upstream release (Closes: #590505, #538164, #565759, #558100,
#500078)
* New Maintainer (Closes: #704450)
*
Hm,
the Binary is not installed in /usr/bin ... well, done for today I will
look at this soon.
Regards,
werner
Am 05.05.13 20:52, schrieb Werner Detter:
> Hi,
>
> I've the mentioned modifications and moved most of the stuff in debian/rules
> from the old
> manual way to debhelper functins wh
On Sun, 05 May 2013 20:45:50 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Looking
> at [1] I only see a finite list of licenses and for those cases (as
> far as I could determine) none matches. Unfortunately there is no
> value like "other" to mark those license(s). How should/could I
> proceed to switch over
In data domenica 05 maggio 2013 19.27.44, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
> Sorry, forgot to mention. I used an original tarball from the upstream's
> website. There are no differences between yours and original's one. Only
> md5sum was different.
How can it be different if the file is identical?
--
Sal
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I am looking for a sponsor for the chinese-checkers package.
http://xdat27.ce.chalmers.se/~salvo/tin171/chinese-checkers_0.3-1.dsc
The client part uses PyQT4 for the interface. The server is written in erlang.
it builds a client
Hi All
I posted a new tentative Debian package here:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/rfc5766-turn-server
I'd appreciate the feedback.
Thanks !
Oleg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
24 matches
Mail list logo
