Bug#699824: Updated package

2013-02-15 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, [ I do not intend to sponsor this package. ] On 02/15/2013 00:51, Benjamin Eltzner wrote: > 11) The only alternatives I see to shipping the "binary" file are: > a) Patch to skip the initialization of the database at first program > start. This will probably result in the "intelligent word seq

Bug#699824: Updated package

2013-02-15 Thread Benjamin Eltzner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Could you create the template database when building the binary > package instead of including it in the debian/ directory? That seems like a good idea (except that it will increase build time a lot). I look into it next week. Thanks for the input.

Re: mathgl: missing-dependency-on-libc needed

2013-02-15 Thread Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos
Hello Anton, Thanks for looking at it. I have built the package with pbuilder under distribution experimental and architecture amd64. Other combinations (unstable + amd64, experimental + i386 etc.) will probably fail due to symbols mismatches. I use the commands $sudo pbuilder --create --base

Bug#662955: rubyripper Re: Bug#662955: Is there any progress?

2013-02-15 Thread Scott Leggett
On 12/02/13 20:28, Steffen Möller wrote: Hello, I would be prepred to sponsor the package, if Scott and/or Benjamin are around to perform the maintenance. It seems a bit like the package just found no sponsor, which is then a sad thing. Steffen Hi Steffen, Yes, I thought it might be diff

Re: mathgl: missing-dependency-on-libc needed

2013-02-15 Thread Anton Gladky
2013/2/15 Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos : > Hello Anton, > Thanks for looking at it. I have built the package with pbuilder under > distribution experimental and architecture amd64. Other combinations (unstable > + amd64, experimental + i386 etc.) will probably fail due to symbols > mismatches. I think,

Bug#693556: (no subject)

2013-02-15 Thread Christoph Mathys
Thanks for the review, Jakub! I fixed the lintian and lintian4python warnings. I talked about the license with upstream and debian-legal and we changed it to BSD-3-clause. Priority has been changed from 'extra' to 'optional'. The gnome-keyring dependency was removed and a mercruial dependenc

Bug#688310: marked as done (RFS: wbar/2.3.4-1 [ITA] -- light and fast launch bar)

2013-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2013 04:20:29 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: wbar/2.3.4-1 [ITA] -- light and fast launch bar has caused the Debian Bug report #688310, regarding RFS: wbar/2.3.4-1 [ITA] -- light and fast launch bar to be marked as done. This means that you claim