Bug#696337: RFS: dualword/1.3.0-1 [ITP] [new package]

2013-01-24 Thread Alexander Busorguin
I'll work on these bugs and let you know when they are done. Thank you for your time. Alex. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAAqsJ3NM5c4w9u-ZZ7e-pC0

Bug#696337: RFS: dualword/1.3.0-1 [ITP] [new package]

2013-01-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Paul Wise , 2013-01-23, 10:39: W: dualword: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/dualword I believe that this one is a false positive. blhc didn't complain about the build log. :) -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Re: Bug#698548: RFS: jabber-muc/0.8-4 [ITA]

2013-01-24 Thread W. van den Akker
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 11:42 +0100, Willem van den Akker wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jabber-muc" > > * Package name: jabber-muc >Version : 0.8-4 >Upstream Author : David Su

Bug#698853: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Dominik George
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Control: tags 698635 + patch pending Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of package "gosa". The upload would fix RC bug #698635. Package name: gosa Version : 2.7.4-4.1 Section : web It builds those binary p

Bug#698853: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, On 24.01.2013 16:09, Dominik George wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > Control: tags 698635 + patch pending > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of package "gosa". The upload > would fix RC bug #698635. > > - a2enmod headers > + [[ -x /u

Bug#698853: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 01/24/2013 17:01, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 24.01.2013 16:09, Dominik George wrote: >> - a2enmod headers >> + [[ -x /usr/sbin/a2enmod ]] && a2enmod headers > > Unfortunately the fix is not good enough. Two issues: > a/ the script uses set -e, this means it will it exit with an error if > a2en

Bug#698853: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Michael Biebl
On 24.01.2013 17:26, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On 01/24/2013 17:01, Michael Biebl wrote: >> a/ the script uses set -e, this means it will it exit with an error if >> a2enmod is missing > > I learned that this is not true: > > > % bash -c 'set -e; false && true; echo Ha.' > Ha. > > > Wh

Bug#698853: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Dominik George
> Unfortunately the fix is not good enough. Two issues: > a/ the script uses set -e, this means it will it exit with an error if > a2enmod is missing No, why should it? That's the whole point of the test before the call of a2enmod. If it doesn't exist, it is never called. > b/ [[ (double brackets

Bug#687564: RFS: irstlm/5.80.01-1 -- [ITP] IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

2013-01-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
cppcheck reports: [src/cmd.c:91]: (error) syntax error [src/mfstream.h:224]: (error) Memory leak: a [src/compile-lm.cpp:235]: (error) Possible null pointer dereference: lmt [src/dictionary.cpp:195]: (error) Memory leak: curve [src/dictionary.cpp:257]: (error) Memory leak: OOVchart [src/interpolat

Re: Work-needing packages report for Jan 25, 2013

2013-01-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, w...@debian.org wrote: > The following packages have been given up for adoption: > >salt (#698772), offered yesterday > Description: remote manager to administer servers > Installations reported by Popcon: 90 I just wanted to point out that this package is