Hello:
Thanks a lot for your review.
On 18/09/12 09:56, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
Hi,
I cloned git repository to build the package.
Here are my first comments. I gonna continue to have a look to the package.
I used the get-orig-source target to download source package.
It fails with
On Sep 18, 2012, at 00:39, Arno Toell wrote:
>
> thanks for your work. I've just sponsored your package. You may have
> gotten a notification by dak. Note, that the package is NEW - meaning it
> needs to be manually approved by a ftp-master. Please note this could
> take a while given we're in
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 05:42:12PM +0200, alberto fuentes wrote:
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/homealoned/homealoned_0.4.1-1.dsc
Nobody seems to care for this package at all. What a shame. Now I had a
look.
First and foremost, the upstream source hides the licensin
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 05:42:12PM +0200, alberto fuentes wrote:
>> dget -x
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/homealoned/homealoned_0.4.1-1.dsc
>
> Nobody seems to care for this package at all. What a shame. Now I had a
> l
Hi everyone,
I'm a new maintainer taking over the maintenance of an existing package.
I have a question about the computer on which I'm creating the package.
Should I upgrade it to sid or leave it at stable?
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
Eric writes:
> I'm a new maintainer taking over the maintenance of an existing
> package. I have a question about the computer on which I'm creating
> the package. Should I upgrade it to sid or leave it at stable?
The package needs to be tested in unstable. For some packages it is
sufficient to t
On 09/18/2012 01:33 PM, Eric wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm a new maintainer taking over the maintenance of an existing package.
> I have a question about the computer on which I'm creating the package.
> Should I upgrade it to sid or leave it at stable?
I run unstable on my daily-use laptop, but
Ok, I'll upgrade to sid.
Thanks,
Eric
On 9/18/2012 12:09 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Eric writes:
I'm a new maintainer taking over the maintenance of an existing
package. I have a question about the computer on which I'm creating
the package. Should I upgrade it to sid or leave it at sta
On 09/18/2012 02:13 PM, Michael Shuler wrote:
> I use pbuilder to build packages in a clean minimal sid chroot
> (cowbuilder is another well used tool). This has many advantages such as
> build dependency checking, automated package signing, and more. You can
> also use the chroot for installation
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:33:52AM -0700, Eric wrote:
> I'm a new maintainer taking over the maintenance of an existing
> package. I have a question about the computer on which I'm creating
> the package. Should I upgrade it to sid or leave it at stable?
If you are able to live on sid, do it, as it
Sounds like a good idea. Which (pbuilder or cowbuilder) would you recommend?
Eric
On 9/18/2012 12:13 PM, Michael Shuler wrote:
On 09/18/2012 01:33 PM, Eric wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm a new maintainer taking over the maintenance of an existing package.
I have a question about the computer on whic
11 matches
Mail list logo
