Bug#679594: marked as done (RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer)

2012-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:45:42 +0100 with message-id <20120904094542.ga23...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#679594: RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer has caused the Debian Bug report #679594, regarding RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer

Bug#686663: RFS: glbd/0.7.5-1 [ITP]

2012-09-04 Thread Steven Ayre
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glbd" Package name: glbd Version : 0.7.5-1 Upstream Author : Codership Oy URL : http://codership.com/products/galera-load-balancer License : GPL2 Section

Bug#686663: Acknowledgement (RFS: glbd/0.7.5-1 [ITP])

2012-09-04 Thread Steven Ayre
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glbd" Package name: glbd Version : 0.7.5-2 Upstream Author : Codership Oy URL : http://codership.com/products/galera-load-balancer License : GPL2 Section : database It builds those binary packages:

Processed: your mail

2012-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 686663 RFS: glbd/0.7.5-2 [ITP] Bug #686663 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: glbd/0.7.5-1 [ITP] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: glbd/0.7.5-2 [ITP]' from 'RFS: glbd/0.7.5-1 [ITP]' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#664584: marked as done (RFS: utouch-evemu/1.0.9-1 [ITP])

2012-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:52:40 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: utouch-evemu/1.0.9-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #664584, regarding RFS: utouch-evemu/1.0.9-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#668877: marked as done (RFS: libreoffice-converter/3.3-2 [ITP])

2012-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:52:51 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libreoffice-converter/3.3-2 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #667974, regarding RFS: libreoffice-converter/3.3-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#667974: marked as done (RFS: libreoffice-converter/3.3-2 [ITP])

2012-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:52:51 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libreoffice-converter/3.3-2 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #667974, regarding RFS: libreoffice-converter/3.3-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#670453: marked as done (RFS: libreoffice-converter/3.3-2 [ITP])

2012-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:52:51 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libreoffice-converter/3.3-2 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #667974, regarding RFS: libreoffice-converter/3.3-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Re: Requesting package review for libti*, tilp, gfm

2012-09-04 Thread Albert Huang
Hello, On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Bart Martens wrote: > I had a look at libticables uploaded to mentors on 2012-08-05 10:02. > Detailed > information on how the repackaged source was obtained, and on how this can > be > reproduced should be provided in debian/copyright. > Will do. > I h

Bug#686679: RFS: asn1c/0.9.21+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ASN.1 compiler for C

2012-09-04 Thread Eugene Seliverstov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asn1c" * Package name: asn1c Version : 0.9.21+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Lev Walkin * URL : http://asn1c.sourceforge.net * License : BSD-2-Clause Section

Processed: asn1c: block ITP 686380 by RFS 686679

2012-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 686380 by 686679 Bug #686380 [wnpp] ITP: asn1c -- ASN.1 compiler for C 686380 was not blocked by any bugs. 686380 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 686380: 686679 > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Processed: glbd: block ITP 562666 by RFS 686663

2012-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 562666 by 686663 Bug #562666 [wnpp] ITP: glbd -- Galera Load Balancer (simple TCP load balancer) 562666 was not blocked by any bugs. 562666 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 562666: 686663 > stop Stopping processing here.

Re: Requesting package review for libti*, tilp, gfm

2012-09-04 Thread Lionel Debroux
Hello, Adding the TilEm maintainer to the Cc list, I'm not knowledgeable to give the appropriate insight on the licensing exception for TilEm. > > The change from libticonv3 to libticonv6 would break the packages > > currently depending on libticonv3. > This really can't be helped - the library

Re: Requesting package review for libti*, tilp, gfm

2012-09-04 Thread Benjamin Moody
>> > The change from libticonv3 to libticonv6 would break the packages >> > currently depending on libticonv3. There should be nothing preventing both versions from being installed simultaneously. Isn't that the point of including the version in the package name? Anyway, the API remains compatib

Bug#686679: RFS: asn1c/0.9.21+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ASN.1 compiler for C

2012-09-04 Thread Arno Töll
tags 686679 + moreinfo thanks Hi Eugene, On 04.09.2012 18:23, Eugene Seliverstov wrote: > A package asn1c was previously maintained by W. Martin Borgert > > but it was removed from testing and unstable distributions due to lack of > adopters. > Current package is based on original package and

Processed: Re: Bug#686679: RFS: asn1c/0.9.21+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ASN.1 compiler for C

2012-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 686679 + moreinfo Bug #686679 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: asn1c/0.9.21+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ASN.1 compiler for C Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 686679: http://bugs.debian.o

Good day! I am Carmelita!:)

2012-09-04 Thread Carmelita Ramer
Hey cutie! )) I am Carmelita. I'm seeking all over the world for my true love, maybe I found u now?!;) Can't wait to talk to u! )) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lis

Rebasing published software and avoid git revert/merge

2012-09-04 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Hello mentors Two months ago I release aptitude 0.6.9 to experimental. Many of those changes will not make it in to Wheezy and I am refactoring and publishing some of the updates under 0.6.8.n. This refactoring is proving to be a better base of development going forward so I plan to forget about

Re: Rebasing published software and avoid git revert/merge

2012-09-04 Thread Florian Schlichting
Hi Daniel, > C'--E stable-0.6 (0.6.8.1, unstable/testing) > / > A---B---C---D master (0.6.9.1, experimental) > > I wish to make stable-0.6 the new master while avoiding a merge or > revert+merge on master (the difference between them is quite large). [...] > I realise that deleting master a