Hi there!
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:00:10 +0200, Julio Merino wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Luca Capello wrote:
>> Do you know that there is a Debian Lua Team (Cc:ed) for (ideally)
>> packaging Lua software? IMHO the package should be maintained by you
>> under that umbrella:
>
> Thanks
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:34:36PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> - based on my experience in previous teams (especially on the Debian
> Common Lisp one), having a single point of contact for questions
> related to all $LANGUAGE packages is really useful.
Exactly. This software seems to be reall
+1 to that... I am also using it and really like it.
Hope you can find a sponsor for this!
--
*Braga, Bruno*
www.brunobraga.net
bruno.br...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is the second try to get sponsor for turses, I'm turses user
> couple o
Raúl Benencia wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroc-icee"
I'll sponsor it as the changes really only fix the RC bug. The package
should get some love from its maintainer though.
Willi Mann from the
Raúl Benencia wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroc-icee"
I'll sponsor it as the changes really only fix the RC bug. The package
should get some love from its maintainer though.
Willi Mann from the
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:59:33 +0200
with message-id <4fdb4dd5.8050...@wm1.at>
and subject line uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #675230,
regarding RFS: zeroc-icee/1.2.0-6.1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Raúl Benencia wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroc-icee"
I'll sponsor it as the changes really only fix the RC bug. The package
should get some love from its maintainer though.
Willi Mann from the S
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl [2012-06-04 21:30:28 CEST]:
> Hi!
>
> On 04.06.2012 19:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> >>> There seems to be just about 0 creative content in that file. What
> >>> exactly is the problem with it?
> >> Figlet 2.2.5 has just been released with the following changelog [1]
Hi,
Le 2012-06-09 15:01, intrigeri a écrit :
quid...@poivron.org wrote (08 Jun 2012 22:35:21 GMT) :
I am waiting:
- for new comments from you or another DD
- to find by myself something to optimize in the code
How long do you intend to wait?
This was not a question of time. Here is the new
On 15/06/12 22:10, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> So for stable, just the license information would need to get
> updated, AIUI.
Attached is a debdiff with backported versions of fonts/8859-* from
figlet 2.2.5. I proposed something similar on #-release last week too.
While I got replies from the release
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 675532 RFS: bilibop/0.3.0 (ITP #675467)
Bug #675532 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bilibop/0.2 (ITP #675467)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: bilibop/0.3.0 (ITP #675467)' from 'RFS: bilibop/0.2
(ITP #675467)'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 677564 RFS: metaphoneptbr/1.12.34 [ITP]
Bug #677564 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: metaphoneptbr/1.12.33 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: metaphoneptbr/1.12.34 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
metaphoneptbr/1.12.33 [ITP]'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
12 matches
Mail list logo
