Hi,
Here is what my project looks like:
fornol$ ll
./
../
CppUTest -> ../../CppUTest/
debian/
fornol.c
fornol.h
Makefile
NEWS
As you can see, I have a `CppUTest' symbolic link that points to
elswhere on my filesystem where I have the latest CppUTest
dist
Thanks, I see what you are doing now.
Looks like you instead should build-dep on libcpputest-dev and use
#include and -llibCppUTest to build against it.
Weird that it only provides static libraries though :/
Tarballs should be built by the upstream build system (`make
distcheck` with automake),
I see. So that's when the symbolic links point to something that's
actually available as a debian package. However, in my case I
simplified things a little bit: I actually also have symbolic links to
a common, in-house library that's not available as a debian package.
Again, I totally agree that it
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:17 PM, David Lindelöf wrote:
> I see. So that's when the symbolic links point to something that's
> actually available as a debian package. However, in my case I
> simplified things a little bit: I actually also have symbolic links to
> a common, in-house library that's no
Ok, thanks for your help and advice. I'll try to do that.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> If I were you I would package the in-house library first, then push
> your CppUTest patches upstream, then work on packaging fornol.
>
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Paul
Le 2012-06-05 20:57, intrigeri a écrit :
Here is a first, quick review.
Thank you.
The whole thing is arch:all, but some shell functions require a Linux
kernel shouldn't bilibop-common have a versioned dependency on Linux
kernel >= 2.6.37 (needed by backing_file_from_loop), and be
arch:linux-
Hi,
quid...@poivron.org wrote (07 Jun 2012 12:53:34 GMT) :
>> The whole thing is arch:all, but some shell functions require a Linux
>> kernel shouldn't bilibop-common have a versioned dependency on Linux
>> kernel >= 2.6.37 (needed by backing_file_from_loop), and be
>> arch:linux-any instead?
> I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello.
I request a fast QA upload of the prelink package with several patches
from the upstream VCS that fix the wine build. I want to have wine built
with this version (more precisely, with the version that produces proper
binaries, if this upload
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 05:42:56 +0200
David Lindelöf wrote:
> The source of my project includes symbolic links to other source trees
> (notably, the CppUTest framework and a library used by several of our
> projects). When I call `dpkg-buildpackage` to build a debian package
> out of my project, I've
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
> Hello!
[...]
> Before I can package Kyua, I have to package first its two
> dependencies (ATF and Lutok). And, because the three packages will
> work in unison, I'd like to get a mentor that is willing to take the
> three reviews (one at a time
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> As a *temporary* workaround could you use hard links instead of
> symbolic? You'd have to link every file individually though, hard links
> aren't supported for directories.
Not really, as that would not be recognized by our version control
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:19:05 +0200
David Lindelöf wrote:
> As a *really temporary* workaround, is there a way I could have the
> build system copy over the files to their proper locations, just for
> building the package? And then delete them and reinstate the symbolic
> links?
Yes, in a Makefile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for reviews of my package "cairosvg".
* Package name: cairosvg
Version : 0.4.3-1
Upstream Author : Kozea
* URL : http://cairosvg.org/
* License : LGPL-3+
It builds those binary pac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 676187 wishlist
Bug #676187 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: veromix/0.17.0-1 [ITP]
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> # NEW packages should be wishlist.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "meta-gnustep".
This upload would fix #653140 and #676231.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/meta-gnustep/meta-gnustep_7.7.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
meta-gnustep (7.7) uns
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to the debian-s390 mailing list)
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub" [1]. Almost a month
passed without any reply.
This version of package should fix FTBFS on s390 and s390x. Which is now
important as I see in debian-devel-anno
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my freshly created sblim-wbemcli package.
Let me quote its long description from the homepage of the sblim
SourceForge project (http://sblim.wiki.sourceforge.net):
The WBEM Command Line Interface is a standalone, convenient systems
management utility for CIMOM
Message original
Objet: Re: Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)
Date: 2012-06-08 02:28
De: quid...@poivron.org
À: intrigeri
Hi,
Le 2012-06-07 15:05, intrigeri a écrit :
So, really, I think the only sane way is to move everything (that is
or
depends on bilibop-common
Hi,
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.2.dsc
Great!
> + * New OpenPGP key.
I doubt this is relevant to debian/changelog.
> + * debian/control: change 'Achitecture: all' to 'Architecture: linux-any'
> for
> +all binaries.
I think you mean "all binary packag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 675532 RFS: bilibop/0.2 (ITP #675467)
Bug #675532 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: bilibop/0.2 (ITP #675467)' from 'RFS: bilibop/0.1
(ITP #675467)'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please c
Your message dated Fri, 08 Jun 2012 04:14:15 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #673096,
regarding RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 08 Jun 2012 04:14:15 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: yaml-cpp/0.3.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #675853,
regarding RFS: yaml-cpp/0.3.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> submitter 101146 !
Bug #101146 [man2html] Spacing and links issues with man2html output
Changed Bug submitter to 'Darren Salt ' from 'Darren
Salt '
> submitter 168591 !
Bug #168591 [wnpp] RFP: libdsk -- a library for accessing disks and disk imag
retitle 657967 O: prelink -- ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking
noowner 657967
unblock 657967 by 659522
block 657967 by 676516
close 659522
stop
The ITA owner Daniel Martà wrote on 21 May 2012 "to make it as a NMU" and
"re-orphan the package and repack the update as a NMU". So Da
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 657967 O: prelink -- ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic
> linking
Bug #657967 [wnpp] ITA: prelink -- ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic
linking
Changed Bug title to 'O: prelink -- ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynami
Hi Bas,
I'm not sure about removing that "the Debian packaging is Copyright (C) 2007,
Adam Majer " from debian/copyright. Are you ?
The files port.h and sprompt.c also have a copyright notice with "PostgreSQL
Global Development Group" but that is not mentioned in debian/copyright. As I
said bef
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:06:36 +
with message-id <20120608060636.ga5...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00.0+dfsg-2 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #671272,
regarding RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00.0+dfsg-2 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:08:29 +
with message-id <20120608060829.gb5...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: mysql-sandbox/3.0.25-1 -- Install and set up one or more
MySQL server instances easily
has caused the Debian Bug report #676358,
regarding RFS: mysql-sandbox/3.0.25-1 -
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:18:20 +
with message-id <20120608061820.ga9...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: radlib/2.11.3-1 [ITP] -- rapid application development
library
has caused the Debian Bug report #659915,
regarding RFS: radlib/2.11.3-1 [ITP] -- rapid application devel
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:20:34 +
with message-id <20120608062033.gb9...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: webacula/5.5.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #672133,
regarding RFS: webacula/5.5.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi,
This RFS is a request to sponsor a package that can be found in a version
control system. To increase your chance to find a sponsor within reasonable
time, you may want to put the source package online somewhere with a link to
the .dsc file, for example at http://mentors.debian.net/ . This i
31 matches
Mail list logo
