Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vim-vimerl"
* Package name: vim-vimerl
Version : 1.4+git20120210.89111c7-1
Upstream Author : Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
* URL : http://github.com/jimenezrick/vim
Your message dated Wed, 09 May 2012 14:50:26 +0200
with message-id <4faa6812.9070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator
has caused the Debian Bug report #659047,
regarding RFS: rpg/1.0.0-1 [NEW] -- Readable Password Generator
to be marked as done.
This means th
forcemerge 661665 671277
thanks
Hi Paul,
please update the old RFS bug if you address issues from a review (and
the package wasn't uploaded). It makes it easier to see the whole
picture in a later review. (Also the older RFS request would still show
on the bug tracker.)
As the BTS will only sh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 661665 671277
Bug #661665 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: openastro.org/1.1.25-2 [ITP] -- Fully
featured Open Source Astrology software
Bug #671277 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: openastro.org/1.1.25+dfsg-4 [ITP]
646308 was blocked by: 661665
Your message dated Wed, 9 May 2012 16:16:18 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: autofs6/5.0.6-1.1 [ITA] [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #671436,
regarding RFS: autofs5/5.0.6-1.1 [ITA] [NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Jung wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plotter"
>
> Package name: plotter
> Version : 2.2-1
> Upstream Author : Ralf Jung
> URL : http://mathespiele.ralfj.de/programm.php?id=25
> License : GPLv2
> Section : math
>
> I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new
package "kde-gtk-config".
* Package name: kde-gtk-config
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Aleix Pol Gonzalez
* URL :
https:/
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bibtexconv". BibTeXConv is a
> BibTeX
> file converter which allows one to export BibTeX entries to other formats,
> including customly defined text output. Furthermore, it provides the
> possibility to check URLs
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 08:00:50 AM Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> forcemerge 661665 671277
> thanks
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> please update the old RFS bug if you address issues from a review (and
> the package wasn't uploaded). It makes it easier to see the whole
> picture in a later review. (Also the o
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.
It builds those binary packages:
uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
The package is
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Since you're on board with us may I suggest that you'll close your RFS
> bug yourself?
done.
--
William
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
On 06.05.2012 10:16, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:24:10 Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> And note that whole 5.0.6-allow-for-kernel-packet-size-change.patch
>> is NOT NEEDED, it should be reverted upstream. *SIGH*, we spent
>> a ton of time and emails discussing this matter, please find
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.
It builds those binary packages:
uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
The package is
On 09.05.2012 22:42, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> I'm checking the package now, it all appears to be quite good (as I
> already mentioned initially).
>
> I'm verifying now whenever the transition works correctly. Did you test
> this place? Is it possible to downgrade back to current version (and
Hi Benoît,
> I took a look at your package; here are a few comments:
Thanks a lot for your detailed review!
> - In debian/copyright, you have a license paragraph called "GPL-2"
> that states: "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
> any later version"; so either this para
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libkaz"
* Package name: libkaz
Version : 1.21-1
Upstream Author : Kaz Kylheku
* URL : http://www.kylheku.com/~kaz/kazlib.html
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Your message dated Wed, 09 May 2012 23:36:50 +0200
with message-id <1336599410.9704.50.camel@LAPJFS>
and subject line Re: RFS: roxterm/2.5.2-1 uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #661389,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.5.2-1 -- Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator
to be marked as done.
This mea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 672307 RFS: libkaz/1.21-1 [ITP] please sponsor Kazlib upload
Bug #672307 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libkaz/1.21-1 [ITA] please sponsor
Kazlib upload
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: libkaz/1.21-1 [ITP] please sponsor Kazlib upload'
from 'RFS:
Your message dated Wed, 09 May 2012 23:40:28 +0200
with message-id <1336599628.9704.54.camel@LAPJFS>
and subject line Re: RFS: swftools/0.9.2+ds1-1 uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #668553,
regarding RFS: swftools/0.9.2+ds1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 06:49:46 AM Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here's my review:
I have addressed these problems with
Bug#671272: RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00.0+dfsg-2 [ITP]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671272
perhaps this new one shoul
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2012 00:48:19 +0200
with message-id <1336603699.9704.58.camel@LAPJFS>
and subject line Re: RFS: rarpd/0.981107-8 [ITA] uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #667903,
regarding RFS: rarpd/0.981107-8 [ITA] -- reverse address resolver
to be marked as done.
This mean
Howdy all,
How should I consolidate the identical documentation directories of
several binary packages from the same source package?
Debian bug#672224 http://bugs.debian.org/672224> notes, correctly,
that a new release switched ‘/usr/share/doc/python-coverage-dbg’ from a
directory to a symlink.
22 matches
Mail list logo
