Bug#662754: Subject: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]

2012-03-06 Thread Jon Hulka
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libre-jigsaw" Package name: libre-jigsaw Version : 2012.03.04-1 Upstream Author : Jonathan Hulka URL : https://github.com/jon-hulka/libre-jig License : GPL-2

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-06 Thread Benoit Knecht
Hi Goswin, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Benoît Knecht writes: > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml" > >> > >> * Package name: libaio-ocaml > >>Version : 1.0~rc1 > >>Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow > >> * URL

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
tags 662632 - moreinfo thanks Stéphane Glondu writes: > Le 05/03/2012 12:33, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml" > > I've looked at the git repository (037a448). It is written explicitly in > [1]: > > "Do not close RFS bugs in debian/c

Processed: Re: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 662632 - moreinfo Bug #662632 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1 [ITP] -- OCaml bindings for libaio Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662632: http://bugs.

who-uploads (was: Bug#661498: marked as done (RFS: burp/1.3.1-1 -- Simple cross-platform network BackUp and Restore Program (new upstream release)))

2012-03-06 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello there, some general info, we are on -mentors after all :-) On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:33:06AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > [...] > This bug appears to be done. > > Not sure who uploaded it, but the pts shows an upload. > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/burp/news/20120303T1

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Benoit Knecht writes: > Hi Goswin, > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Benoît Knecht writes: >> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml" >> >> >> >> * Package name: libaio-ocaml >> >>Version : 1.0~rc1 >> >>Upstream Author

Bug#661975: marked as done (RFS: gearman-interface [NMU] -- fixes 2 RC bugs)

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:41:58 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#661975: RFS: gearman-interface [NMU] -- fixes 2 RC bugs has caused the Debian Bug report #661975, regarding RFS: gearman-interface [NMU] -- fixes 2 RC bugs to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-06 Thread Benoît Knecht
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Benoît Knecht writes: > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> [...] > >> > >> The package is native because I am both maintainer and upstream > >> author. Does a watch file make sense for a native package? > > > > That's not what native means. See the third point of [3]

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

2012-03-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 06/03/2012 15:22, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > I think it important for any maintainer to clearly differentiate in > their mind upstream from Debian, even if they happen to be the same > person. Otherwise, you're artificially limiting your software to Debian, > which is at the opposite side of what

Bug#662812: RFS: lugaru/0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-2

2012-03-06 Thread Martin Erik Werner
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, and pkg-gamers, I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "lugaru" which (amongst other things) fixes an "important" bug: #662424 * Package names : lugaru Version : 0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-2 Upstream Authors: W

Bug#662026: RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP]

2012-03-06 Thread Giulio Paci
Hi Benoît, thank you for your comment. I updated the package, adding the missing libxslt1-dev dependency and fixing a couple of other minor issues. Cheers, Giulio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Bug#662832: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-2 - PDF document viewer with 3D effects

2012-03-06 Thread Andreas Moog
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pdfcube" * Package name: pdfcube Version : 0.0.4-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License

Bug#662832: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-2 - PDF document viewer with 3D effects

2012-03-06 Thread Andreas Moog
On 06.03.2012 18:52, Andreas Moog wrote: Urghs, sorry for the template cruft in the original mail. These are the package details: * Package name: pdfcube Version : 0.0.4-2 Upstream Author : Mirko Maischberger * URL : http://code.100allora.it/pdfcube * License

Processed: Re: Merge two RFSs for different versions of pdfcube

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 651724 with 662832 Bug #651724 {Done: Andreas Moog } [wnpp] ITA: pdfcube -- PDF document viewer with 3D effects Was blocked by: 660665 Added blocking bug(s) of 651724: 662832 > merge 660665 662832 Bug#660665: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 [ITA] -- P

Processed: Raise severity of RFS that fixes RC bug to 'important'

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 662744 important Bug #662744 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ibus-unikey/0.6.1-1 [RC] Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > retitle 662744 RFS: ibus-unikey/0.6.1-1 [RC] -- Vietnamese Input Method > Engine for IBus using Unikey Engine

Processed (with 1 errors): Undo: Merge two RFSs for different versions of pdfcube

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 660665 662832 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > unblock 651724 by 662832 Bug #651724 {Done: Andreas Moog } [wnpp] ITA: pdfcube -- PDF document viewer with 3D effects Was blocked by: 660665 662832 Removed blocking bug(s

Processed: Re: Undo: Merge two RFSs for different versions of pdfcube

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 662832 Bug#662832: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-2 - PDF document viewer with 3D effects Bug#660665: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 [ITA] -- PDF document viewer with 3D effects Disconnected #662832 from all other report(s). > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#660665: marked as done (RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 [ITA] -- PDF document viewer with 3D effects)

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:45:14 +0100 with message-id <20120306194513.gf13...@marvin.lan> and subject line Re: Bug#660665: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 -- PDF document viewer with 3D effects has caused the Debian Bug report #660665, regarding RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 [ITA] -- PDF document viewer w

Processed (with 1 errors): Merge redundant ITP and RFS bugs for libre-jigsaw

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 660435 with 661857 Bug #660435 [wnpp] ITP: libre-jigsaw-pics -- Libre Jigsaw pictures Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 660435: 661857 > merge 660433 660435 Bug#660433: ITP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game Bug#660435

Bug#662026: RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP]

2012-03-06 Thread Benoît Knecht
Giulio Paci wrote: > thank you for your comment. I updated the package, adding the missing > libxslt1-dev dependency and fixing a couple of other minor issues. A few things to look into: - Your man page is quite thin. Please expand it using full words instead of abbreviations (img, th

Bug#662754: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]

2012-03-06 Thread Benoît Knecht
block 660433 with 662754 block 660435 with 662754 merge 661857 662754 thanks Hi Jon, Jon Hulka wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libre-jigsaw" > > Package name: libre-jigsaw > Version : 2012.03.04-1 > Upstream Author : Jonathan Hulka > URL

Processed: Re: Bug#662754: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 660433 with 662754 Bug #660433 [wnpp] ITP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game Bug #660435 [wnpp] ITP: libre-jigsaw-pics -- Libre Jigsaw pictures Was blocked by: 661857 Added blocking bug(s) of 660433: 662754 Was blocked by: 661857 Added bl

sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

2012-03-06 Thread Samuel Bronson
It's getting to the point where I think it would be best if we do one of two things: 1. Split out sponsorship-requests bug mail to a new mailing list. 2. Stop sending it anywhere, and let people subscribe through the PTS if they care. How about you? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentor

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

2012-03-06 Thread Gergely Nagy
Samuel Bronson writes: > It's getting to the point where I think it would be best if we do one > of two things: > > 1. Split out sponsorship-requests bug mail to a new mailing list. > > 2. Stop sending it anywhere, and let people subscribe through the PTS > if they care. > > How about you? I'd

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

2012-03-06 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Samuel Bronson wrote: > It's getting to the point where I think it would be best if we do one > of two things: > >  1. Split out sponsorship-requests bug mail to a new mailing list. > >  2. Stop sending it anywhere, and let people subscribe through the PTS > if they

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

2012-03-06 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
We already tried to discuss the issue in Bug#658498: "sponsorship-requests and debian-mentors mailing list" but I have a feeling our argument hasn't been heard. Regards, Dmitry. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

2012-03-06 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I hate to +1 without much content, but IMHO the "right" thing to do > would be to split off people trying to give or receive help and > automated mail regarding requests for sponsorship. Anyone who doesn't want to receive mail from the BTS should be t

Bug#662754: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]

2012-03-06 Thread Jon Hulka
Benoît Knecht wrote: > block 660433 with 662754 > block 660435 with 662754 > merge 661857 662754 > thanks Thanks for cleaning up my mess. > Please only close #660433 in the changelog, both ITP bugs are now merged > and will be closed together. In general, if a bug needs to be closed > because it

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

2012-03-06 Thread Ben Finney
Don Armstrong writes: > Anyone who doesn't want to receive mail from the BTS should be > trivially able to filter it out.[1] […] > 1: If you can't, either your MUA is severely limited, or you haven't > read its documentation, and you aren't interested in learning procmail > or sieve. Or we're n

Bug#662899: RFS: dsniff/2.4b1+debian-22

2012-03-06 Thread William Vera
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dsniff" * Package name: dsniff Version : 2.4b1+debian-22 Upstream Author : Dug Song * URL : http://www.monkey.org/~dugsong/dsniff/ * License : BSD Sectio