Re: RFS: parcellite 1.0.2~rc5-1 (updated package)

Hi, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio writes: > Sigh... Any one feel giving me a Christmas present? Still builds in a > clean sid chroot, still is lintian clean, and still fixes a bug > reported by a Debian user. >>>  dget -x >>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/parcellite/parcellite_1.0.2~rc5

Re: RFS: parcellite 1.0.2~rc5-1 (updated package)

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Hi, > > Andrew Starr-Bochicchio writes: >> Sigh... Any one feel giving me a Christmas present? Still builds in a >> clean sid chroot, still is lintian clean, and still fixes a bug >> reported by a Debian user.  dget -x http://m

RFS: stopmotion 0.6.2-1.2 (NMU to fix RC bugs)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of "stopmotion". it fixes #565056, #606721, and #612762. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/stopmotion Alternatively, one can download the package with dget usi

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

* Ansgar Burchardt , 2011-12-25, 19:43: Stable is frozen, we do not change packages there unless there is a very good reason to do so. The bug you are fixing does not seem to qualify as release critical thus we need to deal with the problem as is. OK, thanks for your details. I do also think, th

Re: RFS: stopmotion 0.6.2-1.2 (NMU to fix RC bugs)

Hi, Mahyuddin Susanto writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of "stopmotion". it fixes #565056, > #606721, and #612762. [...] > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stopmotion/stopmotion_0.6.2-1.2.dsc > > http://bugs.debian.org/565056 > http://bugs.debian.org/606721 >

RFS: policyd-weight

Hi, >> well, you're presumably the new maintainer. Hence it is up to you to >> package new versions whenever that seems feasible to you. Generally you >> should try to keep track with upstream so yes, package the new version >> by evolving the latest source package available in Sid. > > The curre

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

Hi, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "policyd-weight". [...] > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc >From d/changelog: ++ * New upstream release ++- (Closes: #641227) The second

Re: RFS: owncloud 2.0.1

Le mercredi 23 novembre 2011 22:51:42, Thomas Müller a écrit : > Dear mentors, Hi Thomas, > I am STILL looking for a sponsor for my package "owncloud". > Meanwhile version 2.0.1 was released. Did anyone volunteered to be your sponsor for owncloud ? If not, I'm interested in this tool ! > * Pa

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

Ansgar Burchardt writes: > You should mention that the package has a new maintainer and close the > bug indicating that the package is orphaned (#612734). Oh, I forgot: you also should retitle the bug from "O (orphaned)" to "ITA (intend to adopt)" and set yourself as owner. Regards, Ansgar --

Sofa-framework: Again QT help needed

Hi, I'm afraid I need some Qt help again. I tried to build latest version of sofa-framework using Debian packaged libraries if possible but failed. I have uploaded my try to http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/sofa-framework/ There is obviosely some trouble in the Qt3 compatibility la

Re: RFS: owncloud 2.0.1

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: >  - I can't find any licence for JPlayer files, for instance : >    apps/media/js/Jplayer.swf >    apps/media/js/jquery.jplayer.min.js In addition, neither of these comes with source code, this is a violation of the GNU GPL: http://jpl

Re: RFS: stopmotion 0.6.2-1.2 (NMU to fix RC bugs)

Hi, On 12/29/2011 02:40 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > The current package built fine in unstable (as --no-add-needed is not > the default yet). > > The other FTBFS bug (#565056) looks strange, more like a bug in gcc that > has been fixed since. Are you sure your upload changed anything > related