Re: RFS: anox

2011-12-09 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Sébastien Bertrand writes: >>  - It probably does not handle whitespace in command names or >>   directories. > > It handles complex command without problem. How? anonx does app = ' '.join(sys.argv[1:]) # Pick all arguments, but calling foo "bar x" is not the same as calling foo bar

Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

2011-12-09 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 08.12.2011 21:03, schrieb Emilien Klein: > Is there anyone available to sponsor my NMU from 2011-10-27? I'm sorry, but personally I don't like to sponsor your NMU. Some of the reasons are: * Only fixing a wishlist bug, nothing else * The wishlisht bug is a "new version" not detailing wh

Re: RFS: anox

2011-12-09 Thread Sébastien Bertrand
Le 9 déc. 2011 10:27, "Ansgar Burchardt" a écrit : > > Sébastien Bertrand writes: > >> - It probably does not handle whitespace in command names or > >> directories. > > > > It handles complex command without problem. > > How? anonx does > > app = ' '.join(sys.argv[1:]) # Pick all arguments

Re: Using /lib/init/vars.sh and its VERBOSE variable in init.d scripts

2011-12-09 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas, On 09.12.2011 06:50, Thomas Goirand wrote: > # Load the VERBOSE setting and other rcS variables > . /lib/init/vars.sh > > [...] > case "$1" in > start) > [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && log_daemon_msg "Starting $DESC" "$NAME" > > but

Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

2011-12-09 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:58:20 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > I'm sorry, but personally I don't like to sponsor your NMU. > > Some of the reasons are: > > * Only fixing a wishlist bug, nothing else > * The wishlisht bug is a "new version" not detailing why the new version > is needed

Re: RFS: php-xml-beautifier

2011-12-09 Thread Mathias Ertl
Hi! On Thursday, December 08, 2011 09:05:16 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: > Please use pkg-php-tools for your package, so that it can use variable > substitutions, so that you can later use: ... Done. The new package on mentors and on the VCS: https://git.fsinf.at/apt/php-xml-beautifier ... no

Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

2011-12-09 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 09.12.2011 13:17, schrieb David Bremner: >> * Only fixing a wishlist bug, nothing else >> * The wishlisht bug is a "new version" not detailing why the new version >> is needed >> * No apparent consent of the maintainer for the NMU > I agree with the first two points. But I think the third

Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

2011-12-09 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Alexander, 2011/12/9 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl : > I'm sorry, but personally I don't like to sponsor your NMU. Makes me sad ;) (joking) > Some of the reasons are: > > * Only fixing a wishlist bug, nothing else > * The wishlisht bug is a "new version" not detailing why the new version > is need

Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

2011-12-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl , 2011-12-09, 13:56: * Only fixing a wishlist bug, nothing else * The wishlisht bug is a "new version" not detailing why the new version is needed * No apparent consent of the maintainer for the NMU I agree with the first two points. But I think the third is OK, acc

RFS: python-poster (was: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer)

2011-12-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Emilien Klein , 2011-11-25, 15:37: I am thus looking for someone to sponsor my NMU. It can be found at http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-poster. I gave it a quick look: + * debian/control: +- Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 This is not appropriate for an NMU. +- Added Vcs-B

Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

2011-12-09 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 09.12.2011 15:39, schrieb Jakub Wilk: >> Ah, right. Missed that. However, his mail seems to underline my >> point: This package should have at least a new co-maintainer, > Eh, why? Because the maintainer failed to respond to a wishlist bug? No, because he seems to be busy with his baby,

Re: RFS: python-poster (was: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer)

2011-12-09 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Jakub, If I understand it correctly none of the changes I've made are acceptable for an NMU. That's fine by me, as l'm just trying to get a newer version that is free of the bug due to which I have to duplicate code. If fixing part of the Lintian warnings are not fit for a NMU, I'll gladly not

Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

2011-12-09 Thread Emilien Klein
2011/12/9 Jakub Wilk : > * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl , 2011-12-09, 13:56: >> This package should have at least a new co-maintainer, > > > Eh, why? Because the maintainer failed to respond to a wishlist bug? It's actually failing to respond to 6 direct emails and 4 posts on the bug report [0], afte

Re: RFS: python-poster

2011-12-09 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Emilien, On 09.12.2011 16:22, Emilien Klein wrote: > If I understand it correctly none of the changes I've made are > acceptable for an NMU. That's fine by me, as l'm just trying to get a > newer version that is free of the bug due to which I have

Re: RFS: nuitka (2nd try)

2011-12-09 Thread Kay Hayen
Hello everybody, it's been silent, but I would appreciate more review or even sponsoring. So, anybody? :-) In the meantime, there have been "upstream" updates, so the version is no longer the current, but I upload them silently; I assume that these don't go unnoticed due to http://mentors.d

Re: RFS: python-poster

2011-12-09 Thread Emilien Klein
Thanks Arno for your detailed explanation, makes complete sense. +Emilien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canqxmqhdgq5jjltybvgoh8-jwzmqe9vwpjrcz

Re: RFS: python-poster (was: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer)

2011-12-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Emilien Klein , 2011-12-09, 16:22: If I understand it correctly none of the changes I've made are acceptable for an NMU. That's fine by me, as l'm just trying to get a newer version that is free of the bug due to which I have to duplicate code. I'd happy to sponsor the NMU if it fixed this

Re: RFS: python-poster (was: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer)

2011-12-09 Thread Emilien Klein
2011/12/9 Jakub Wilk : > I'd happy to sponsor the NMU if it fixed this one thing. Great! One more question: For my initial NMU on 2011-10-27 I used version number 0.8.1-0.1. Should I use the same (since it hasn't been uploaded to unstable) and just pretend nothing else happened, or bump that number

Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

2011-12-09 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Emilien Klein wrote: > 2011/12/9 Jakub Wilk : >> * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl , 2011-12-09, 13:56: >>> This package should have at least a new co-maintainer, >> >> >> Eh, why? Because the maintainer failed to respond to a wishlist bug? > > It's actually failing to r

Re: RFS: python-poster (was: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer)

2011-12-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Emilien Klein , 2011-12-09, 18:36: One more question: For my initial NMU on 2011-10-27 I used version number 0.8.1-0.1. Should I use the same Yes, please use the same. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

2011-12-09 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Robert, 2011/12/9 Robert Collins : > politics aside, I'm happy if you want to add yourself to uploaders or > even take over the package. Thanks for you response. I'll make this upload a NMU, and will work to get that maintained within the Python group (still need to figure out how, though) >

Re: RFS: php-xml-beautifier

2011-12-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/09/2011 08:46 PM, Mathias Ertl wrote: > I already joined the mailinglist there and enjoy the spam that comes in there > every day ;-). I did however file a join-request on their Alioth homepage. I > can only hope they approve the request. > I'd suggest sending a private mail to the admi

Re: RFS: python-poster (was: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer)

2011-12-09 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Jakub, 2011/12/9 Jakub Wilk : > * Emilien Klein , 2011-12-09, 16:22: > >> If I understand it correctly none of the changes I've made are acceptable >> for an NMU. That's fine by me, as l'm just trying to get a newer version >> that is free of the bug due to which I have to duplicate code. > > >

Re: RFS: python-poster

2011-12-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Emilien Klein , 2011-12-09, 22:36: If I understand it correctly none of the changes I've made are acceptable for an NMU. That's fine by me, as l'm just trying to get a newer version that is free of the bug due to which I have to duplicate code. I'd happy to sponsor the NMU if it fixed this

Re: RFS: python-poster

2011-12-09 Thread Emilien Klein
2011/12/9 Jakub Wilk : > I uploaded the package to DELAYED/2. Please post full debdiff between > 0.7.0-1.1 and 0.8.1-0.1 to the bug log. Thanks Jakub for the upload. Full debdiff is to be found here: http://paste.debian.net/148759/ Please let me know if using the paste service isn't appropriate (

Re: RFS: openssn (2nd try)

2011-12-09 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openssn". > >  * Package name    : openssn >  Version         : 0.8-1 >  Upstream Author : Jesse Smith >  * URL             : http://openssn.sourceforge.net/ >  * License         :

Re: RFS: python-poster

2011-12-09 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Emilien, On 09.12.2011 23:22, Emilien Klein wrote: > Full debdiff is to be found here: http://paste.debian.net/148759/ > Please let me know if using the paste service isn't appropriate (I've > set it to never expire) no it is not. Jakub meant t

Re: RFS: anox

2011-12-09 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:30:38AM +0100, Sébastien Bertrand wrote: > > calling > > > > foo "bar x" > > > > is not the same as calling > > > > foo bar x. > > >From the point of view of anoX, these two commands are the same. From the UNIX point of view, they are not. -- Andrea Bolognani Resi

Re: RFS: python-poster

2011-12-09 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Arno, 2011/12/9 Arno Töll : > no it is not. Jakub meant to file a bug denoting your NMU to the BTS. > You can use the nmudiff to get the idea. #610114 [1] is a random example > of what we mean too. In your case you shouldn't be filing a new bug > though, but reply to the existing one you are cl

Re: RFS: python-poster

2011-12-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 00:25, Emilien Klein wrote: > Hi Arno, > > 2011/12/9 Arno Töll : >> no it is not. Jakub meant to file a bug denoting your NMU to the BTS. >> You can use the nmudiff to get the idea. #610114 [1] is a random example >> of what we mean too. In your case you shouldn't be filing

Re: RFS: nuitka (2nd try)

2011-12-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Kay Hayen wrote: > In the meantime, there have been "upstream" updates, so the version is no > longer the current, but I upload them silently; I assume that these don't go > unnoticed due to http://mentors.debian.net/package/nuitka anyway? There is currently zero