Hello,
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:12:04 +0900
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I wonder if it was the right thing to do, and if it is a change that
> can be forwarded upstream.
I always use ?= in my Makefiles because it may be important to someone
to be able at least partially override the setting I use.
>
> On 2011-11-14 06:12, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > trying to pass dpkg-buildglags' settings to an upstream build system
> > (http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-med/bwa.git), I found no other way than
> > patching their makefile, basically replacing
> >
> > CFLAGS = -g -Wall -O2
> >
> > wi
On 14/11/2011 11:40, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Does anybody know the reason why dpkg-buildflags does not include -Wall ?
I believe, the reason is that -Wall is really useful only the developer,
not the one who build the package.
In addition, not all upstream projects are really warnings free (some
* Nicolas Bourdaud [14 12:29]:
> I believe, the reason is that -Wall is really useful only the developer,
> not the one who build the package.
>
> In addition, not all upstream projects are really warnings free (some
> developer never use -Wall -Wextra). So using them by default when
> buildin
# bye
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2cac11ac-b2d1-40fd-b70b-ffdf1d41f...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mydumper".
* Package name: mydumper
Version : 0.5.1-1
Upstream Authors: "Domas Mituzas" ,
"Andrew Hutchings" ,
"Mark Leith"
* URL : http://www.mydumper.org
* Licens
On 14/11/2011 14:32, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> Without -Wall you won't get some of the most "critical" warnings.
> A package should really not be built without at least -Wall.
I understand, and I think it is a pity that some software produce way
too many warnings when compiled with -Wall and -Wext
Nicolas Bourdaud writes:
> On 14/11/2011 14:32, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>> Without -Wall you won't get some of the most "critical" warnings.
>> A package should really not be built without at least -Wall.
>
> I understand, and I think it is a pity that some software produce way
> too many warning
When I successfully upload a package debian.mentors software has no problem
with, I get a success email.
However, if there is something wrong with the package, (that can be detected
by the auto software), so that the package is not added to the list, I get no
email message.
Also, on the "Deta
Hi!
Thanks Paul!!
I have a new version, I will upload it in a few hours (and I will
comment your email ;-)), but... I need help with this:
[1] Problems in the copyright file with some licenses. What license I
need to use?
[2] GPL-2 block. I need to add the license to the file?
Thanks a lot
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks Paul!!
>
> I have a new version, I will upload it in a few hours (and I will comment
> your email ;-)), but... I need help with this:
>
> [1] Problems in the copyright file with some licenses. What license I need
> to use?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Paul,
On 14.11.2011 19:52, Paul Elliott wrote:
> However, if there is something wrong with the package, (that can be detected
> by the auto software), so that the package is not added to the list, I get no
> email message.
You do. You will get
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote:
> However is it not already too late to catch those warnings when the
> package is being built? IMO, they should have been taken care in
> upstream. Or do you consider to *massively* patch the source to fix the
Upstream usually doesn't have access to ne
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:45 +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hey Paul,
>
> On 14.11.2011 19:52, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > However, if there is something wrong with the package, (that can be
> > detected
> > by the auto software), so that the package is not added to the list, I get
> > no
> > email mess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chris,
On 14.11.2011 21:39, Chris Carr wrote:
> I am identifiable - I have uploaded a previous package[1] in exactly the
> same way and received email notification. Yet this time I have had no
> email, either success or rejection. The package ha
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 21:53 +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> On 14.11.2011 21:39, Chris Carr wrote:
> > I am identifiable - I have uploaded a previous package[1] in exactly the
> > same way and received email notification. Yet this time I have had no
> > email, either success or rejectio
Hello,
I am looking for a reviewers for my python package "wader". I
believe that I can find a sponsor (hi dannf), but would
appreciate the Debian python experts reviewing the upstream as
well as the packaging.
* Package name: wader
Version : 0.5.8-1
Upstream Author : Andrew Bi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chris,
On 14.11.2011 22:11, Chris Carr wrote:
> That's very odd. I can confirm that I did not receive the email - it is
> not in Gmail's junk folder either.
Nov 8 22:17:23 debdev postfix/smtpd[15217]: A11ABFDCF:
client=unknown[82.199.139.46]
N
Alex Chiang wrote:
> wader-core - alternative D-Bus service for managing modems
>
> Long description:
> A drop-in replacement for modemmanager and alternative implementation of
> the ModemManager API, with extensive support for many UMTS devices,
> simple plugin system for supporting new devic
Hello Didier,
* Didier Raboud :
>
> So, let's ask again: ;-)
>
> "What does wader{,-core} do that can't be done in modemmanager?"
A reasonable question.
>From a user's perspective, you get support for devices that MM
does not support:
https://github.com/andrewbird/wader/blob/mast
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libswe".
* Package name: libswe
Version : 1.77.00.0003-1
Upstream Author (code): Dieter Koch , Alois Treindl
Upstream Author (autotools package): Paul Elliott
* URL : http://swissephauto.blackpatchpa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "swe-standard-data".
* Package name: swe-standard-data
Version : 3-1
Upstream Author (data): Dieter Koch ,Alois Treindl
Upstream Author (tarball): Paul Elliott
* URL : http://swissephauto.blackpatc
Paul Elliott blackpatchpanel.com> writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libswe".
I'll do it. There has been a longstanding request for the Swiss Ephemeris from
users. I even made a package at one point but didn't pursue it as it wasn't
completely Open Source at the time. I'll r
Hello mentors,
I'm still looking for a sponsor for uploading my adapted package dwm.
Best Regards
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Vasudev Kamath
wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for package dwm. This package was orphaned
> by its previous maintainer. This upload will close
24 matches
Mail list logo
