Dear Ansgar,
thanks for having looked at the package. I have re-uploaded it on
mentors. It would be great if you could review the changes:
Le 27/09/11 10:47, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Thibaut Paumard writes:
>> gimp-gap - animation package for the GIMP
>> http://mentors.debian.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lebiniou".
Package name: lebiniou
Version : 3.11-1
Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel
URL : http://biniou.net
License : GPLv2
Section
Salut Olivier,
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 11:21 +0200, Olivier Girondel wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lebiniou".
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lebiniou/lebiniou_3.11-1.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Rebuilt using the official t
Hello
I try to find the licences of a software developped at Duke university
by a PhD student "named" William T. Rankin / wran...@ee.duke.edu. the
software is dpmta[1] but as you can see all the links are broken.
when I look into the code, there is no LICENSE file but the header of
the files in t
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:11:52PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello
>
> I try to find the licences of a software developped at Duke university
> by a PhD student "named" William T. Rankin / wran...@ee.duke.edu. the
> software is dpmta[1] but as you can see all the links are broken.
Y
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dfu-programmer".
* Package name: dfu-programmer
Version : 0.5.4-2
Upstream Author : Weston Schmidt
* URL : http://dfu-programmer.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : electronics
Le Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:17:07 +0100,
Nick Leverton a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:11:52PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I try to find the licences of a software developped at Duke university
> > by a PhD student "named" William T. Rankin / wran...@ee.duke.edu. th
Le Wednesday 14 September 2011 06:44:11, Daniel Schaal a écrit :
> I uploaded an updated package to http://mentors.debian.net/package/bino
Here are some comments:
- debian/copyright: In fact the "simple All-Permissive License" you mention
is very close to BSD 2-clause license [1]. To respect D
The libapache2-mod-socket-policy-server package has been reviewed and
Thomas Goirand has offered to sponsor it, however, both he and I would
appreciate another set of eyes (does not have to be a DD) looking it
over before upload.
The package is an Apache2 module for serving Adobe socket policy
Am 25.09.2011 18:12, schrieb Stefan Ott:
I'm asking because I think it's going to be non-trivial to find people
who are willing to test a new tool that solves a problem which, for
many people, doesn't seem to be extremely urgent.
Anyway, if somebody on this list is interested in trying it out, y
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011, 17:22:35 schrieb Dominique Dumont:
> Le Wednesday 14 September 2011 06:44:11, Daniel Schaal a écrit :
> > I uploaded an updated package to http://mentors.debian.net/package/bino
>
> Here are some comments:
Thanks for the review.
> - debian/copyright: In fact the
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 16:09 +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> Le Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:17:07 +0100,
> Nick Leverton a écrit :
>
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:11:52PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I try to find the licences of a software developped at Duke un
810d4rk <810d...@gmail.com> writes:
> Is anyone interested in uploading heimdall version 1.1.1 to the repos?
> Heimdall is a cross-platform open-source tool suite used to flash
> firmware (aka ROMs) onto Samsung Galaxy S
> devices.(http://www.glassechidna.com.au/products/heimdall/)
That's an unfo
What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages?
mentors.debian.net complains about my standards version:
W: libswe source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2)
But if I set this version 3.9.2 on the control file
Then lintian on my local debian 6.0 syste
lintian -i -I is complaining about architecture-independent data:
I: libswe-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2121kB 78%
N:
N:The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data
N:(over 4MB, or over 2MB and more than 50% of the package) in /usr/share
N:but is a
Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages?
>
> mentors.debian.net complains about my standards version:
> W: libswe source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2)
>
> But if I set this version 3.9.2 on the control file
> Then l
On 09/28/2011 08:54 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages?
All package uploads go into unstable (Sid), so all new packaging
development should also be done on Sid. You might wish to look into
pbuilder, cowbuilder, or a simple dev chroot made
Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> lintian -i -I is complaining about architecture-independent data:
> I: libswe-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2121kB 78%
> N:
> N:The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data
> N:(over 4MB, or over 2MB and more than 50% of the pack
On 09/28/2011 06:54 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages?
The short answer: sid.
The longer answer is that you can develop on stable, build in a sid
chroot using pbuilder from stable, and run lintian from backports. But
you still need to tes
package: reportbug
version: 6.2.1
severity: wishlist
Hi,
I've written a patch to tentatively support a mentors.debian.org pseudo
package (in order to better track and support the incredible volume of
sponsorship requests and such). Note that there is still ongoing
discussion about the right way t
20 matches
Mail list logo
