Howdy all,
Lintian recommends (via tag ‘debian-rules-missing-recommended-target’):
=
N: Note that the following form is recommended however:
N:
N: build: build-arch build-indep
N: build-arch: build-stamp
N: build-indep: build-stamp
N: build-stamp:
N: build here
=
I
Hi Ben,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:10 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> Lintian recommends (via tag ‘debian-rules-missing-recommended-target’):
>
> =
> N: Note that the following form is recommended however:
> N:
> N: build: build-arch build-indep
> N: build-arch: build-st
Greetings,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:13:56PM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> What is the relationship, if any, between the version number of the source
> pachage and the version number of a library, which has to do with SONAME.
>
> What do these have to do with PACKAGE_VERSION in autotools?
>
>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mosquitto". This is an
updated package for a new upstream version. The new version includes
an additional exported symbol in the two libraries. I believe I've
updated the .symbols files correctly, but would appreciate it being
checked.
The
> As library packaging is generally regarded as a difficult task, a very
> good guide at
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
> is a recommended reading. That guide contains also very clear
> background information on the various version numbering systems
> pos
Hi Roger,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 09:20 +0100, Roger Light wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mosquitto". This is an
> updated package for a new upstream version. The new version includes
> an additional exported symbol in the two libraries. I believe I've
> updated the .symbols fil
Greetings,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:26:19AM +, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > As library packaging is generally regarded as a difficult task, a very
> > good guide at
>
> > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
>
> > is a recommended reading. That guide
* Kilian Krause , 2011-07-26, 09:18:
I'm not too sure what would happen if you'd put %: dh $@ and also
.PHONY into debian/rules. Considering the internal stamps of dh that
might also be an option.
% is supposed to be used for file targets only (though it's common to
abuse it for other purpose
* Kilian Krause , 2011-07-26, 11:33:
You have debian/pyversions which you might also want to document in
debian/control as XS-Python-Version.
No. Use either debian/pyversions or XS-Python-Version, not both.
(Just to be clear: XS-Python-Version is not only for documentation
purposes, it's actu
hi,
I'm trying to upload a package to incoming queue as DM, but it fails.
> Reject Reasons:
> lur...@gmail.com is not in Maintainer or Uploaders of source package yaskkserv
I'm sure that what tutorial says
(http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer/Tutorial):
1) DMUA: yes
2) my key is in debian-m
Hi,
Hi, On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:30:03PM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote:
> I'm trying to upload a package to incoming queue as DM, but it fails.
>
> > Reject Reasons: lur...@gmail.com is not in Maintainer or Uploaders
> > of source package yaskkserv
Have you tried replying to the email and aski
Hi!
I'd like to ask for a sponsor for an update to hashalot (a tool needed by
cryptsetup, obsolete nowadays but some folks still use it).
There's just one minor documentation fix, but I also nuked the whole
debian/rules replacing it with oh-so-long dh two liner. The copyright is in
DEP-5 format
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 13:30, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote:
> $ egrep '(Allowed|KURA)' yaskkserv_0.4.0-5.dsc
> Maintainer: KURASHIKI Satoru
> Dm-Upload-Allowed: yes
Aren't fields in "Deb 822" format case-sensitive?
(They are at least if it comes to Packages files and co.)
Best regards
David Kalnis
Hi,
As promised, here is my review.
Thanks Paul for your thorough review! I (hopefully) managed to fix all
the issues you pointed out. I uploaded an updated version to the mentors
site which also appears to be lintian clean.
I hope that all these improvement will help to find an sponsor fo
* Adam Borowski , 2011-07-26, 13:32:
I'd like to ask for a sponsor for an update to hashalot (a tool needed
by cryptsetup, obsolete nowadays but some folks still use it).
There's just one minor documentation fix, but I also nuked the whole
debian/rules replacing it with oh-so-long dh two liner.
Hi Andrew,
On 2011-07-25 13:48, Andrew Gainer wrote:
> Alright, thanks for the clarification. I've bumped each package to
> *-2, added changelog entries, and uploaded again.
I just uploaded it to the Debian's NEW queue. Thank you for the
contribution to Debian.
One minor detail (for the next upl
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Adam Borowski , 2011-07-26, 13:32:
> >I'd like to ask for a sponsor for an update to hashalot (a tool
> >needed by cryptsetup, obsolete nowadays but some folks still use
> >it).
> >
> >There's just one minor documentation fix, but I al
Hi Torsten
The looks/*.jar files are not distributed in the package. They are
present in the source because I do
distribute them with the Windows version of jampal.
Jampal runs fine without them, and some of them are available as
separate packages in Debian, so the
user can install them if he want
Hi Peter,
Am 26.07.2011 16:32, schrieb Peter Bennett:
> The looks/*.jar files are not distributed in the package. They are
> present in the source because I do
> distribute them with the Windows version of jampal.
> Jampal runs fine without them, and some of them are available as
> separate packag
* Adam Borowski , 2011-07-26, 15:24:
I'd like to ask for a sponsor for an update to hashalot (a tool
needed by cryptsetup, obsolete nowadays but some folks still use it).
There's just one minor documentation fix, but I also nuked the whole
debian/rules replacing it with oh-so-long dh two liner
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Am 26.07.2011 16:32, schrieb Peter Bennett:
> > The looks/*.jar files are not distributed in the package. They are
> > present in the source because I do
> > distribute them with the Windows version of jampal.
> > Jampal r
Jakub,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 06:28:23PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Adam Borowski , 2011-07-26, 15:24:
> >>>I'd like to ask for a sponsor for an update to hashalot (a
> >>>tool needed by cryptsetup, obsolete nowadays but some folks
> >>>still use it).
> >>>
> >>>There's just one minor documenta
Hi César,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:30:24PM +0200, Cesar Mauri wrote:
[...]
> >control
> >- Your standards version is very old. The current version is 3.9.2.
> > Check what you need to change, and update accordingly.
>
> Updated standards version to 3.9.1
Without futher review of the actual p
Thanks Kilian
I will create a repackaged source with a new version number 02.01.05-2,
with the "looks" directory excluded.
I will add a get-orig-source target that creates the repackaged source,
and try to conform with Debian developers Reference (6.7.8.2 Repackaged
upstream source).
At this time
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:33:44PM -0400, Peter Bennett wrote:
> Thanks Kilian
>
> I will create a repackaged source with a new version number 02.01.05-2,
> with the "looks" directory excluded.
> I will add a get-orig-source target that creates the repackaged source,
> and try to confor
Hi all people on debian-mentors,
Debexpo is a replacement for http://mentors.debian.net/. I hereby request
testers! It is of "beta" quality -- I think it works fully and has enough
features to replace mentors.debian.net.
It has the following improvements over http://mentors.debian.net/ :
* M
Hi Asheesh,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:55:00PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Debexpo is a replacement for http://mentors.debian.net/. I hereby
> request testers! It is of "beta" quality -- I think it works fully
> and has enough features to replace mentors.debian.net.
that's great news!
I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.07.2011 20:17, Kilian Krause wrote:
> I think you saw already at http://expo.debian.net/package/trafficserver:
> sh: uscan: command not found
>
> Looks like there's a path missing for your uscan test.
This was fixed already, as far as I can tel
Hi Asheesh,
Le mardi 26 juil. 2011 à 19:55:00 (+0200 CEST), Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
> Hi all people on debian-mentors,
>
> Debexpo is a replacement for http://mentors.debian.net/. I hereby
> request testers! It is of "beta" quality -- I think it works fully
> and has enough features to replace m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Julien,
On 26.07.2011 20:37, Julien Valroff wrote:
> On the package details page, it would be great if URL's could be clickable
> (Homepage, VCS-Browser). Also Lintian tags could be linked to their
> description on lintian.d.o
This issue is alread
Le lundi 25 juillet 2011, Kilian Krause a écrit :
> having already signed off the according lib, I've also built, signed
> and uploaded this package. ;-)
Hi,
Thank you.
--
Jérôme SONRIER
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
> It may also help to know whether the package is already in Debian (with
> a link to packages.d.o in order to know more about the history of the
> uploads) or if it is a new package.
packages.qa.d.o please.
And while we're wri
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Julien Valroff wrote:
Hi Asheesh,
Le mardi 26 juil. 2011 à 19:55:00 (+0200 CEST), Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
Hi all people on debian-mentors,
Debexpo is a replacement for http://mentors.debian.net/. I hereby
request testers! It is of "beta" quality -- I think it works fully
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Kilian Krause wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
It may also help to know whether the package is already in Debian (with
a link to packages.d.o in order to know more about the history of the
uploads) or if it is a new package.
pack
On 2011-07-26 22:01, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Kilian Krause wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> * output from lintian -IX --pedantic
>
> Difficulty: 0 (super easy)
>
> (step 0: get the latest code from git)
>
> Step 1: edit debexpo/plugins/lintian.py
>
> Right now, we call lintian like th
Hi Asheesh,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 04:01:26PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Kilian Krause wrote:
[...]
> >* whether or not the orig.tar.gz is original
>
> How do we detect this programmatically?
Thanks for taking the time to even explain that detailled how to get the
code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kilian,
On 26.07.2011 22:25, Kilian Krause wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure if we want to run get-orig-source targets to rebuild
> ~dfsg tarballs and compare them.
I don't think, you really want to consider to run /anything/ which has
been supplied
* Kilian Krause , 2011-07-26, 22:25:
- detect whether debian/watch is there and useful
- if so and if the version is not mangled (like ~dfsg etc.), run uscan
--force-download in a patched version that does not involve uupdate or
svn-update (i.e. does call any programs that an "attacker" might w
Hi Arno,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:34:50PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 26.07.2011 22:25, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > I'm not entirely sure if we want to run get-orig-source targets to rebuild
> > ~dfsg tarballs and compare them.
>
> I don't think, you really want to consider to run /anything/ whi
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:40:44PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Kilian Krause , 2011-07-26, 22:25:
> >- detect whether debian/watch is there and useful
> >- if so and if the version is not mangled (like ~dfsg etc.), run
> >uscan --force-download in a patched version that does not involve
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Kilian Krause wrote:
Hi Asheesh,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 04:01:26PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Kilian Krause wrote:
[...]
* whether or not the orig.tar.gz is original
How do we detect this programmatically?
Thanks for taking the time to even ex
Hi Asheesh,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:00:45PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Kilian Krause wrote:
[...]
> >- detect whether debian/watch is there and useful
> >- if so and if the version is not mangled (like ~dfsg etc.), run uscan
> > --force-download in a patched version tha
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for
the new version 2:2.017-1 of my package "cl-asdf".
It builds theis binary package:
cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package cl-asdf can also be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://men
Kilian
I will have to use +dfsg1 instead of ~dfsg1, because ~ sorts before the
base version and now uscan thinks there is a newer version available
(unless I have failed to understand something here - which is quite likely)
jampal: Newer version (02.01.05) available on remote site:
http://qa.deb
Hi,
Thanks Kilian for your feedback which helped me to improve the package.
I've updated and uploaded it again to the mentors site. The package
appears to be lintian clean.
[...]
Updated standards version to 3.9.1
Without futher review of the actual package: Why not to 3.9.2?
I had chos
Kilian Krause writes:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:10 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Lintian recommends (via tag ‘debian-rules-missing-recommended-target’):
> >
> > =
> > N: Note that the following form is recommended however:
> > N:
> > N: build: build-arch build-indep
> >
I made all changed suggested by all answers i recevied after my first
mentor request
to upload Dolibarr ERP & CRM :
Package provided is now a source package built with dpkg-source :
DSC:http://www.dolibarr.org/files/debian/dolibarr_3.1.0-1.1.dsc
Source tgz: http://www.dolibarr.org/fi
Asheesh Laroia writes:
> Debexpo is a replacement for http://mentors.debian.net/. I hereby
> request testers! It is of "beta" quality -- I think it works fully and
> has enough features to replace mentors.debian.net.
Like many people, I have far too many online credentials already.
Signing up to
I have repackaged the source, built, signed, uploaded
Version is now 02.01.05+dfsg1-1
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jampal
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jampal/jampal_02.01.05+dfsg1-1.dsc
If all is OK ple
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Ben Finney wrote:
Asheesh Laroia writes:
Debexpo is a replacement for http://mentors.debian.net/. I hereby
request testers! It is of "beta" quality -- I think it works fully and
has enough features to replace mentors.debian.net.
Like many people, I have far too many onl
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
* Please tell me if there are features we need before it can replace
mentors.debian.net.
Arno found one showstopper bug, and I just fixed it.
If there are any others, let me know. Otherwise, about 24 hours from now,
I plan to ask signum if we can t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Laurent,
thanks for your interest in putting packages to Debian. We all
appreciate your efforts, but ...
> Package provided is now a source package built with dpkg-source :
> DSC:http://www.dolibarr.org/files/debian/dolibarr_3.1.0-1.1.
Asheesh Laroia writes:
> 2) Integrate OpenID logins, so you can use existing credentials (e.g.
> Google Account, your own personal OpenID,
This would be the option I'd most like to see, for the reason you give:
it allows a huge number of existing identities, including identities
managed by the p
Asheesh Laroia writes:
> Otherwise, about 24 hours from now, I plan to ask signum if we can
> turn mentors.debian.net off, and make it a debexpo instance.
Gak! I didn't realise the proposal was for existing mentors.debian.net
service to be replaced immediately. In that case, please ensure existi
Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> If there are any others, let me know. Otherwise, about 24 hours from
> now, I plan to ask signum if we can turn mentors.debian.net off, and
> make it a debexpo instance.
>
> That will mean losing the existing uploaded packages. But I think
> that's not such a huge loss.
Do
55 matches
Mail list logo
