Nikolaus,
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 14:56 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc
thanks for the update.
1. Regarding the example scrips you ship I'm sort of undecided whether
they would actually fit better in examples rather than "contri
Hi,
sorry for the late reply to this bug. I can reproduce the problem on my
side but I'm not finally sure that this is really a problem of clonalframe
or whether it is a bad coincidence with libgsl0-dev. The line in question
where the problem occures is:
src/move_hidden.cpp:423:59: error: taki
Hi Guillermo,
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 12:32 -0430, Guillermo Lengemann wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odvr".
>
> * Package name: odvr
> Version : 0.1.5-1
> Upstream Author : Tristan Willy
> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/odvr/
>
Hello!
I just got my `retext' package accepted.
Currently the orig tarball includes compiled binary arch-independent
.qm files (but I can easily change this, since I'm the upstream author
too).
Will it be better if I provide .ts text-format source for translations
and compile them during build? T
Dmitry,
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:32 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> I just got my `retext' package accepted.
>
> Currently the orig tarball includes compiled binary arch-independent
> .qm files (but I can easily change this, since I'm the upstream author
> too).
> Will it be better if I provide .
Thanks, I'll change it in the next version.
-
Dmitry Shachnev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=t=hzhuzjcpi5um7h35z90me7...@mail.gmail.com
Hello Kilian
On 06/27/2011 02:00 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
>
> And I see during compilation that /var/log/secure and /var/log/xferlog are
> used. IIRC the default for proftpd is /var/log/proftpd/{secure,xferlog}. Do
> you
> reckon running gadmin-proftpd works ok?
Works well at here, but i'll inv
On 2011-06-29, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Will it be better if I provide .ts text-format source for translations
> and compile them during build? This will add a big build-dependency on
> Qt.
the Qt linguist tools have recently been split out from the qt dev tools
to make it easier to just require
Hi,
> Your package is uninstallable on some archs:
>
>mrbayes-mpi/mips unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
>mrbayes-mpi/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
>mrbayes-mpi/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
I admit I'm not so comfortable with these architectures. Is there any
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 15:01 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Your package is uninstallable on some archs:
> >
> >mrbayes-mpi/mips unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
> >mrbayes-mpi/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
> >mrbayes-mpi/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
>
Hi Nikolaus,
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 09:30 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 03:02 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Nikolaus,
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 14:56 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> >> dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc
> >
> > thanks for the up
On 06/29/2011 03:02 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Nikolaus,
>
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 14:56 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc
>
> thanks for the update.
>
> 1. Regarding the example scrips you ship I'm sort of undecided whether
>
On 29 June 2011 at 15:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Hi,
|
| > Your package is uninstallable on some archs:
| >
| >mrbayes-mpi/mips unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
| >mrbayes-mpi/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
| >mrbayes-mpi/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
|
| I adm
Hi all,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.68-1 of my package "ps2eps".
It builds these binary packages:
ps2eps - convert PostScript to EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) files
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would no bug except the ITA (#534380), but it introdu
On 29 June 2011 at 08:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 29 June 2011 at 15:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
| | Hi,
| |
| | > Your package is uninstallable on some archs:
| | >
| | >mrbayes-mpi/mips unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
| | >mrbayes-mpi/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
|
Hi Matteo,
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 15:41 +0200, Matteo Cypriani wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.68-1 of my package "ps2eps".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> ps2eps - convert PostScript to EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) files
>
> The package appears
Hi Olivier,
On 05/04/11 18:24, Olivier Girondel wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "lebiniou" and
> "lebiniou-data".
Sadly I am not a DD, but I am responding to Michael's request for
non-DDs to review packages.
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/06/ms
Hi Kilian,
Wow, that was really quick!
Le mercredi 29 juin 2011 16:32:49, Kilian Krause a écrit :
> 1. Your package source still contains binaries in bin/linux, bin/win,
> bin mac-os-x, bin/hpux ...
>
> Please prepare a DFSG-repack and remove *all* binary blobs. Using the
> get-orig-source targe
Hello,
A few extra remarks from a non-DD :
debian/control
--
- The VCS-* fields should be relative to the debian packaging, not
the upstream repository. From what I've seen, this source package
has been generated from the upstream "debian/" subdirectory. This
is mislead
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasmixer".
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.12.0-3
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer/
* License : GPL V3
Section :
Hi Matteo,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 05:51:28PM +0200, Matteo Cypriani wrote:
> Wow, that was really quick!
Heh, happens if you do this more often and have your tools quite ready at
hand. ;-)
> Le mercredi 29 juin 2011 16:32:49, Kilian Krause a écrit :
> > 1. Your package source still contains bi
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 05:54:49PM +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
> A few extra remarks from a non-DD :
>
> debian/control
> --
>
> - The VCS-* fields should be relative to the debian packaging, not
> the upstream repository. From what I've seen, this source package
> has
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 05:54:49PM +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
> debian/control
> --
>
> - The VCS-* fields should be relative to the debian packaging, not
> the upstream repository. From what I've seen, this source package
> has been generated from the upstream "debian
Le mercredi 29 juin 2011 18:14:14, Kilian Krause a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 05:51:28PM +0200, Matteo Cypriani wrote:
> > Yes, I though this was not an issue because the binary are small.
> > I will try to negotiate with upstream a binary-free tarball, and if
> > possible with the source Do
Hi,
I'm not DD. I'm sorrry. This my fast review about your package:
1. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat , debian/control
2. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
3. no necessary quilt as build-dependency[0]
4. under debian/copyright specify license version, LGPL-3 (i.e)
5. for your patch,
Hi,
I am not a DD, and so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But here my
fast review about your package:
1. debian/changelog:
no close some bug, ITP or ITA? So clean:
"(Closes: #) "
and your initial Debian release should be 4.6.2-1 no just 4.6.2
2. debhelper is 7. Bump to
Hi,
I am not a DD, and so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But here my
fast review about your package:
1. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
2. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat, debian/control
3. debian/copyright: please use DEP-5 format[0]
4. debian/rules: clean the initial
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:51:14PM -0500, Ruben Molina wrote:
> I'm not a DD, but I had done a short review of your package...
Also me, here my fast review about your package only to add:
>
> You need to work in your debian/copyright, because the package's license
> is GPL-2+, and not just
Hi,
thanks I will fix that soon.
Regards,
Nicolas
2011/6/29 Elías Alejandro
> Hi,
> I'm not DD. I'm sorrry. This my fast review about your package:
>
> 1. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat , debian/control
> 2. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
> 3. no necessary quilt as build-depend
Hi Matteo,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 06:36:05PM +0200, Matteo Cypriani wrote:
> Le mercredi 29 juin 2011 18:14:14, Kilian Krause a écrit :
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 05:51:28PM +0200, Matteo Cypriani wrote:
> > > Yes, I though this was not an issue because the binary are small.
> > > I will try to
Hi,
I am not a DD, and so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But here my
fast review about your package:
1. debian/changelog, seems it first Debian release?.
just include a first release (no other version that no appear officially
under Debian)
also please read[0] to improve you
Hi again,
debian/watch can be improved, clean initial comments
and check[0] then test with:
uscan --no-download --verbose
[0] http://googlecode.debian.net/
Regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Hi,
I am not a DD, so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But here my
fast review about your package:
1. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
2. Maybe you can use debhelper version 8 under: debian/compat, debian/control
3. debian/copyright: please use DEP-5 format[0]
4. Newest version on remo
Hi Christian,
I had a quick look at your package, and here are some remarks.
First, the project's page mention the following:
"This project is used to develop the honeypot. Do not use this code to
install a honeypot unless you are interested in helping development."
I wonder if such a program can
Hello,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:11:56 -0500
Elías Alejandro wrote:
> I am not a DD, so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But
> here my fast review about your package:
> 1. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
Yes, I know.
> 2. Maybe you can use debhelper version 8 under: debian/compat,
>
* Andrew O. Shadoura , 2011-06-30, 00:30:
5. Lintian issues (lintian -iI --pedantic):
W: tnat64: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtnat64-0.1
W: tnat64: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libtnat64.so.0.1
usr/lib/libtnat64.so I: tnat64: no-symbols-control-file
usr/lib/libtnat64.so.0.
Le mercredi 29 juin 2011 23:07:09, Matteo Cypriani a écrit :
> Hi Christian,
>
> I had a quick look at your package, and here are some remarks.
>
> First, the project's page mention the following:
> "This project is used to develop the honeypot. Do not use this code to
> install a honeypot unless
On 06/29/2011 09:37 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
>>> 2. You symlink your contrib scripts from /usr/share/doc (!)
>>> into /usr/bin which is not really the best solution out there. Please
>>> decide whether these shall either go as examples (and not symlinked
>>> to /usr/bin/) or whether they are offici
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1-1
of my package "latex-mk".
It builds these binary packages:
latex-mk - tool for managing LaTeX projects
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/d
> > - The dependency against lebiniou-data is not versioned. That means
> > that lebiniou is meant to be usable with any version of
> > lebiniou-data. In such a case I think you need to specify exactly
> > one version. With a single source package, you could depend on
> > lebinou-
Etienne,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 08:30:54AM +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
> > > - The dependency against lebiniou-data is not versioned. That means
> > > that lebiniou is meant to be usable with any version of
> > > lebiniou-data. In such a case I think you need to specify exactly
> > >
41 matches
Mail list logo
