Re: RFS: preprocess

2011-04-05 Thread Johannes Ring
Hi Jonathan, On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:34:07AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: >> P: no-upstream-changelog: upstream changelog is in README.txt > > You use debhelper, in a round-about way: see > 1. dh_installchangelogs(1) > 2. http://build-

RFS: wmmixer

2011-04-05 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package wmmixer. * Package name: wmmixer Version : 1.5-12 * URL : http://www.dockapps.org/ * License : GNU Public License, Version 2.0 Section : x11 It builds these binary packages: wmmixer

RFS: imagemagick (updated package)

2011-04-05 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 8:6.6.9.3-1 of my package "imagemagick". Nelson, here in cc was used to download imagemagick package but is now a little bit quiet nowadays. It builds these binary packages: imagemagick - image manipulation programs imagemagick-dbg - d

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Mentors, > > I am not compiling the package the first time, but today I got an error > on Squeeze which could be lead to the yesterdays "upgrade": No, not related. > Ehm, on the top, dpkg-deb say "signfile xmem_1.20-29+b1.dsc" and then at > d

Re: RFS: ipt-netflow

2011-04-05 Thread Alexey Osipov
В Втр, 05/04/2011 в 09:49 +0800, Paul Wise пишет: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Alexey Osipov wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipt-netflow". > ... > > ipt-netflow - netfilter target which sends traffic statistics via NetFlow > > ipt-netflow-dkms - netfilter target which

Re: RFS: ipt-netflow

2011-04-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Alexey Osipov wrote: > As I know, upstream never tried to merge it into mainline. Thats a shame, please suggest it to them. > Will this deny inclusion of my packet into Debian? No. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Re: RFS: wmmixer

2011-04-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Rodolfo kix Garcia, Am 2011-04-05 01:51:46, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > I try to upload the package to mentors.debian.net but I have a proble > uploading the source file (I don't know how to upload it) > The package can be found on http://www.kix.es/src/wmaker/wmmixer/ Create an accou

Re: RFS: wmmixer

2011-04-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Create an account on m.d.o and then create a config file of > > [ '~/.dupload.conf' ]--- > package config; > > $default_host = "mentors"; > > $cfg{'mentors'} = > { No need to have this bit, the defau

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Thankyou Raphael, > Because "+b1" means bin-nmu 1 and is never part of the source version. > That's policy. > > Don't put "+bX" at the end of your version and you'll be fine. OK (it was working some ears ago...), but how to build the same Package Version for different Releases (unstable, stable

Re: RFS: wmmixer

2011-04-05 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:44:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > >> Create an account on m.d.o and then create a config file of >> >> [ '~/.dupload.conf' ]--- >> package config; >> >> $default_host = "mentors";

Re: RFS: wmmixer

2011-04-05 Thread Julian Taylor
On 04/05/2011 01:01 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:44:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Hi, > > I followed the steps of > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-intro: > > package config; > > $cfg{'mentors'} = > { >fqdn => 'mentors.debian.net', >incoming => '/

Re: RFS: wmmixer

2011-04-05 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:10:24 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 04/05/2011 01:01 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:44:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> > > an update changing only the debian revision will not include the > original source code anymore, but mentors (unlike the mai

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-05 Thread Karl Goetz
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:00:43 -0700 Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Karl Goetz wrote: > > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 11:39:34 +0100 > > Philip Taylor wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Vincent Cheng > > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Karl Goetz

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-05 Thread Karl Goetz
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:15:56 -0700 Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Karl Goetz wrote: > > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:08:39 +0100 > > Philip Taylor wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Karl Goetz > > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:59:59 -0700 > > > > I've

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-05 Thread Karl Goetz
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:56:43 -0700 Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Philip Taylor > wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Karl Goetz > > wrote: > > >> > ./libraries/fcollada/src/FCollada/FColladaTest/Samples/Copyright.txt > > >> > ./libraries/fcollada/src/FCollada/

Re: RFS: wmmixer

2011-04-05 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
On 05/04/11 13:10, Julian Taylor wrote: On 04/05/2011 01:01 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:44:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: an update changing only the debian revision will not include the original source code anymore, but mentors (unlike the main archive) requires it. buil

RFS: cl-launch, cl-asdf (updated packages)

2011-04-05 Thread Faré
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.006-1 of my package "cl-launch", and the new version 2:2.014.3-1 of my package "cl-asdf". It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell cl-asdf- Another System Definition

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-05 Thread Philip Taylor
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > I didn't come across a FTBFS, but I suppose that was because I built 0 A.D. > within a pbuilder configured for Testing (which, at the time, had libenet > 1.2 available). Philip, is upstream planning to port 0ad to a newer version > of libenet

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-05 Thread Philip Taylor
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Since dbghelp isn't needed for 0 A.D. on Linux, would it be preferable if I > simply strip the files affected by that license out of the source package? The only file affected is binaries/system/dbghelp.dll, which is in SVN and in the Windows

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-05 Thread Philip Taylor
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Karl Goetz wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:08:39 +0100 >> Philip Taylor wrote: >> > now, since https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628723 gives a >> > relatively stable modern version - just need to d

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-05 Thread Philip Taylor
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Philip Taylor wrote: > >> It can be created and parsed and rendered (but not modified) by the >> game engine. It used to be exported by a custom 3ds Max plugin but we >> no longer use that (we export to Collada si

Re: RFS: polygraph

2011-04-05 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:27:36 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 04/03/2011 03:36 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > >> /* Web Polygraph http://www.web-polygraph.org/ > >> * (C) 2003-2006 The Measurement Factory > >> * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 */ > > > Here you are in

RFS: weboob

2011-04-05 Thread Christophe Benz
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "weboob". * Package name: weboob Version : 0.7-2 Upstream Author : Romain Bignon * URL : http://www.weboob.org/ * License : GPLv3 Section : python It builds these binary packages: boobank-

RFS: debconf-kde (ping)

2011-04-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "debconf-kde". * Package name: debconf-kde Version : 0.1+git20101228-1 Upstream Author : Daniel Nicoletti * URL : https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/sysadmin/libdebconf-kde/ * License : LGPL-2+

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Michelle Konzack [110405 01:23]: > Ehm, on the top, dpkg-deb say "signfile xmem_1.20-29+b1.dsc" and then at > dpkg-genchanges I get "../xmem_1.20-29.dsc can't be read". I compiled > the last two days 16 Packages and it was working and now not more. > > Any suggestions what it can be th

RFS: lebiniou, lebiniou-data

2011-04-05 Thread Olivier Girondel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "lebiniou" and "lebiniou-data". Package name: lebiniou, lebiniou-data Version : 3.8-1 Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel URL : http://biniou.net License :

Re: RFS: ipt-netflow

2011-04-05 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05.04.2011 12:20, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Alexey Osipov wrote: >> As I know, upstream never tried to merge it into mainline. Perhaps because the home page says: # Coded for linux kernels 2.6.18 - 2.6.29. # Community supp

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Alexander, Am 2011-04-05 19:51:23, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > Do you know what the +b1 means? A +b1 never has an actual source > package, therefore the b1 is cut off. I was told it is used as NMU upload... But how can I provide packages for 3 releases in the same time without con

Re: RFS: weboob

2011-04-05 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On 2011-04-05 12:04:00 Christophe Benz wrote: >boobank- Bank accounts console tool >boobmsg- Read and post messages on websites from console >havesex- Sexual life swiss-knife >monboob- Email proxy for websites containing messages >qboobmsg - Read and post messages on websites - Qt

Re: RFS: weboob

2011-04-05 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05.04.2011 21:24, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > I can't help but think that these package names and descriptions might be > offensive to parts of the Debian community. Would Debian really be serving > it's users by including these packages as i

Re: RFS: denyhosts

2011-04-05 Thread Paul Gevers
I am not a DD, so I can not sponsor, but I have some comments. > I have filed an ITA for the Orphaned denyhosts package and am in need of > a sponsor. Great. I use this package as well, so I like it that there is a maintainer again. > I have created a first package to update the maintainer for t

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Didier Raboud
Michelle Konzack wrote: > Can I use e.g.: > > 1.20-29 -> unstable (source included) > 1.20-29b1 -> stable/squeeze > 1.20-29b2 -> oldstable/lenny > > I was thinking there could be an upgrade problem later if I use this or > is there a special naming scheme for multi-releas

RFS: mpg321 (updated package, 2nd try)

2011-04-05 Thread Nanakos Chrysostomos
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.13-2 of my package "mpg321". It builds these binary packages: mpg321 - Simple and lightweight command line MP3 player The package appears to be lintian clean. Added '-K' option so the user can enable/disable the Basic Keys fun

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Harald Jenny
Hi On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:22:43PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > I have this problem with 17 packages. > > Can I use e.g.: > > 1.20-29 -> unstable (source included) > 1.20-29b1 -> stable/squeeze > 1.20-29b2 -> oldstable/lenny > I think you might find http://backpor

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Harald Jenny, Am 2011-04-06 00:01:20, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > I think you might find http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3 > interesting, specifically point 4 - this would translate for you to: > > 1.20-29 -> unstable (source included) > 1.20-29~bpo60+1

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Philip Taylor wrote: > For old ones, we don't have the modifiable form (except as 3ds Max > files scattered around various people's disks and FTP sites - the art > process wasn't well organised). Hmm, OK. > For old static meshes, we could use that Python script

Re: RFS: denyhosts

2011-04-05 Thread Kyle Willmon
> > I have created a first package to update the maintainer for this and > > uploaded it on my own personal webspace: > > If I were allowed to update packages, I would not upload one that only > changes the maintainer. Please also fix some bugs in the bug tracker > while you are working on this pa

Re: RFS: denyhosts

2011-04-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi > Thanks for the comments. Your welcome. > I have reviewed the available patches from the > BTS and included them in my package. I will continue to work on the > other open bugs for this package. Also, I have fixed the lintian issues > on this package. Just a very quick view: please consider