Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-03-20 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi mentors, I'd appreciate if somebody could have a look at this package. Thanks! +Emilien 2011/2/9 Emilien Klein : > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-image-manipulator". > > * Package name    : nautilus-image-manipulator >  Version         : 0.2-1 >  Ups

Re: RFS: scidavis (updated package) - FTBFS

2011-03-20 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 17 March 2011 17:21:08 Ruben Molina wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.4-3 > of my package "scidavis". > > It builds these binary packages: > scidavis - application for scientific data analysis and visualization > > The package appears to

co-maintainer on parcellite?

2011-03-20 Thread doug Springer
Andrew, Can I become a co-maintainer with you on parcellite? I do apologize for any confusion I've caused. Kind Regards, Doug Springer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: h

RFS: lilo (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-03-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:23.1-2 of my package "lilo". It builds these binary packages: lilo - LInux LOader - the classic OS boot loader lilo-doc - LInux LOader - Documentation for the classic OS boot loader The package appears to be lintian clean. T

RFS: driftnet (updated package)

2011-03-20 Thread David Suarez
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.7-1 of my package "driftnet". It builds these binary packages: driftnet - Picks out and displays images from network traffic The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 608369, 616451 The package c

Re: RFS: driftnet (updated package)

2011-03-20 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Hi, > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/driftnet > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/driftnet/driftnet_0.1.7-1

Re: GSoC 2011 project APT/dpkg declarative diversions

2011-03-20 Thread Chris Baines
I think you are on slightly the wrong list. I understand your confusion, this is the Debian mentors mailing list, but instead of GSoc mentoring, this list handles package mentoring. The list you want is the soc-coordination [1] list. Chris [1] soc-coordinat...@lists.alioth.debian.org On 19 March

Re: RFS: driftnet (updated package)

2011-03-20 Thread David Suarez
On Domingo 20 Marzo 2011 20:02:26 Daniel Echeverry escribió: > * The Standars Version should be 3.9.1 not 3.9.1.0 > * copyright file in the source field: should be the homepage of the > upstream > > now we have to wait for a DD to check more thoroughly, and if there're no > problems, you can uploa

Git Package Versioning

2011-03-20 Thread Chris
Can anyone point me in the direction of a appropriate package versioning scheme when packaging software taken directly from a git vcs? Thanks, Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Git Package Versioning

2011-03-20 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi, Le dimanche 20 mars 2011 à 21:18:43 (+0100 CET), Chris a écrit : > Can anyone point me in the direction of a appropriate package versioning > scheme when packaging software taken directly from a git vcs? The best I have found is to use something like: +gitMMDD. You need the date as the g

Re: Git Package Versioning

2011-03-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Julien Valroff wrote on 2011-03-20 21:48: > The best I have found is to use something like: > +gitMMDD. Please be aware, that "+" is not the optimal connector. Try dpkg --compare-versions and see: a) 1.2.0 is less than 1.2.0+git2011 b) 1.2.0 is greater than 1.2.0~git2011 The versi

Re: Git Package Versioning

2011-03-20 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:25:38 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Julien Valroff wrote on 2011-03-20 21:48: > > > The best I have found is to use something like: > > +gitMMDD. > > Please be aware, that "+" is not the optimal connector. > Try dpkg --compare-versions and see: > > a) 1.2.0 is l

Re: Git Package Versioning

2011-03-20 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:25:38 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > > Please be aware, that "+" is not the optimal connector. > Try dpkg --compare-versions and see: [snip] > The version b) is the better way. So please use "~" > as connector. That rather depends on your goal. If the version number

Re: Git Package Versioning

2011-03-20 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:25:38PM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Julien Valroff wrote on 2011-03-20 21:48: > > > The best I have found is to use something like: > > +gitMMDD. > > Please be aware, that "+" is not the optimal connector. > Try dpkg --compare-versions and see: > > a) 1.2.0

Re: RFS: scidavis (updated package) - FTBFS

2011-03-20 Thread Ruben Molina
El dom, 20-03-2011 a las 15:15 +0200, George Danchev escribió: > On Thursday 17 March 2011 17:21:08 Ruben Molina wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.4-3 > > of my package "scidavis". > Uploaded. Thank you for taking care of the bugs. Thanks a lot! Best regards Ruben

Re: Git Package Versioning

2011-03-20 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi, Le dimanche 20 mars 2011 à 23:16:47 (+0100 CET), Stephen Kitt a écrit : > On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:25:38 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn > wrote: > In this example, the Debian package version could be either > 1.2.0+gitMMDD.-1, which could be read as "everything in the > 1.2.0 release plus all chang