Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-01-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <20110117074140.ga16...@an3as.eu>, Andreas Tille wrote: >[Y]ou should NOT maintain the debian/ >directory in the upstream source tree (for several reasons discussed >several times before). That's not a problem. Release tarballs (including snapshots) should just not contain the debian/ directo

Re: RFS: monit (updated package)

2011-01-17 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:54:27 +0300 Sergey B Kirpichev napsal(a): > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/monit > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - dget http://ment

Re: RFS: libzeep

2011-01-17 Thread Maarten L. Hekkelman
Op 15-01-11 23:13, Niels Thykier schreef: I messed around a bit and the library appears to build just fine with - --no-add-needed (and --no-undefined), so it appears to be properly linked. Today I found out something is still wrong, when I tried to link to the libzeep.a file the linker was

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-01-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:57:27AM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <20110117074140.ga16...@an3as.eu>, Andreas Tille wrote: > >[Y]ou should NOT maintain the debian/ > >directory in the upstream source tree (for several reasons discussed > >several times before). > > That's not a problem.

Re: Bug#608220: RFS: hugs98 (NMU, RC bugfix)

2011-01-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:12:18 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Felix Geyer (17/01/2011): > > I didn't realize that you were talking about the patch itself. > > Attaching it now. > > Thanks, sponsored. Thanks for spotting I failed to get it fixed in the > first place, too. > Unblocked. Cheers

Re: RFS: libzeep

2011-01-17 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-01-17 12:18, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote: > Op 15-01-11 23:13, Niels Thykier schreef: > >>I messed around a bit and the library appears to build just fine with >> - --no-add-needed (and --no-undefined), so it appears to be properly >> lin

Re: RFS: snake4 (updated package)

2011-01-17 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-01-16 21:33, michael wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.12-12 > of my package "snake4". > > It builds these binary packages: > snake4 - Snake game > > The upload would fix these bugs: 581387 (

«dh_pysupport» and «dh_pycentral» with basic Pythons scripts

2011-01-17 Thread fred0a
Hello, I would like to know if «dh_pysupport» and «dh_pycentral» must be used with basic Pythons scripts, located in /usr/bin for example. I have added «python-support» in debian/control and «dh_pysupport» in debian/rules but it seems not found the needed dependencies. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

RFR/RFS: trafficserver - a fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 compliant, caching proxy

2011-01-17 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, this is a re-post as I did accidentally file my last request as follow-up. If you did already notice it quite a few days ago please ignore this mail. I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trafficserver". As first step I am happy on

Re: RFS: monit (updated package)

2011-01-17 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
Michal, thank you for reply and suggestions. > Few comments: > > - You don't need README.source for 3.0 source packages. > - Please document why is needed lintian override in > debian/monit.lintian-overrides Done > - Please rename and document debian-changes-1:5.2.3-1 patch > P: monit: copyrigh

Re: RFS: monit (updated package)

2011-01-17 Thread Michal Čihař
hi Dne Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:47:02 +0300 Sergey B Kirpichev napsal(a): > Michal, thank you for reply and suggestions. > > > Few comments: > > > > - You don't need README.source for 3.0 source packages. > > - Please document why is needed lintian override in > > debian/monit.lintian-overrides >

Re: RFS: libzeep

2011-01-17 Thread Maarten L. Hekkelman
Op 17-01-11 12:39, Niels Thykier schreef: Today I found out something is still wrong, when I tried to link to the libzeep.a file the linker was not able to find the symbols. Trying to get rid of the lintian error: 'unstripped-binary-or-object Libraries are always a heap of fun! I have not ha

RFS: pdnsd (QA upload)

2011-01-17 Thread Mahyuddin Susanto
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.8-par-1 of my package "pdnsd". It builds these binary packages: pdnsd - Proxy DNS Server The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 476538, 487467, 527352, 596302, 597734, 602262, 602329, 610148

Examples directory

2011-01-17 Thread Angel Abad
Hi! I maintain python-django-dajaxice package, in the new upstream version dajaxice ships html documentation and a lot of example files. I would to split package in python-django-dajaxice and python-django-dajaxice-doc for html documentation. But Im not sure what is the best package to include exa

Re: Examples directory

2011-01-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Angel Abad wrote: > I would to split package in python-django-dajaxice and > python-django-dajaxice-doc for html documentation. But Im not sure > what is the best package to include example files, python module > package or documentation package? I would put the

Re: RFS: monit (updated package)

2011-01-17 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:09:47PM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > There is /usr/share/doc/monit/monit.html . It might have same > content as man page, but I still think it is worth registering it into > doc-base. Right now it's out of sync with patched upstream manpage. I think, it's better don't i

Re: «dh_pysupport» and «dh_pycentral» with basic Pythons scripts

2011-01-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi fred0a (2011.01.17_14:28:28_+0200) > I would like to know if «dh_pysupport» and «dh_pycentral» must be used with > basic Pythons scripts, located in /usr/bin for example. It is only necessary to use a python helper if you are installing Python modules. If you just have scripts, nothing special

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

2011-01-17 Thread Tony Houghton
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:26:43 +0800 Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > OK. When I was doing the final test, roxterm existed immediately after > launch. 1.18.5-3, however, has no such problem. I suspect it's only my > environment, x86_64-linux-gnu. Do you have any clue? I can reproduce this with zsh and nano, b

AW: RFS: fmodapi4.26

2011-01-17 Thread Johey Shmit
Hi Scott, - Ursprüngliche Mail > Von: Scott Howard > An: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 13. Januar 2011, 15:50:27 Uhr > Betreff: Re: RFS: fmodapi4.26 > > >> library's filename). I know your package lacks a SONAME, but you can > >> add one like the enet p

Re: "dh_pysupport" and "dh_pycentral" with basic Python scripts

2011-01-17 Thread fred0a
Ok thanks and sorry for the no standard chars in the title, it was a copy/past from a manpage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295289502.4d348c9ebb.

Re: RFS: rman (updated package)

2011-01-17 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, Niels, I have uploaded a new version of rman. Could you not, please, have a look? It seems, that I have fixed all issues, which were suggested by you. I did not sent a patch, which fixes cppcheck warnings, to upstream as those warnings were done by adding gzip-feature to the code (probably,

Re: RFS: python-akismet

2011-01-17 Thread mezgani ali
Hi Luke, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:10 PM, mezgani ali wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-akismet". > > * Package name: python-akismet > Version : 0.2.0-1 > Upstream Author : Michael Foord ] > > * URL : http://www.voidspace.org

Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-17 Thread travis+ml-debian-mentors
Hey all, http://www.subspacefield.org/packages/ubuntu/ I've made that polipo-tor package available in the above repo. I tried to reach the Ubuntu packagers who made the ubuntu package, but was told to ask here. I haven't received any feedback since posting here on the package itself, and am cur

Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-17 Thread travis+ml-debian-mentors
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=polipo-tor;seeksponsor=0 Not asking for a sponsor right now since it depends on pkgs not in deb/ubu repos. But would like constructive criticism on packaging. Version upped to 1.4 with various minor packaging fixes. --

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2011-01-17 Thread Damien Leone
Hello, Any reviewer please? -- Damien Leone

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

2011-01-17 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Tony Houghton writes: > PS Is this now OT for the list and I should stop Cc'ing it? OK. Let's take this off list. -- A badly written book is only a blunder. A bad translation of a good book is a crime. -- Gilbert Highet -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@list

Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-17 Thread Scott Howard
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:42 PM, wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=polipo-tor;seeksponsor=0 > > Not asking for a sponsor right now since it depends on pkgs not in deb/ubu > repos. > > But would like constructive criticism on packaging. > > Versi

Re: before starting ...

2011-01-17 Thread Rémi Vanicat
Tony Peña writes: > Hi, > 1st place, sorry by my english, i expected be understood :-) > > i wanna be future DM so have to get some things before right!?, i read it > many docs before start like debian policy, the machine, and the others > and now have to always tab the guide-maint, to see all st

HOWTO: Source a common shell script between DEBIAN/config and DEBIAN/preinst

2011-01-17 Thread harish badrinath
Given that i was told that you can deterministically determine which file would run first DEBIAN/control _or_ DEBIAN/preinst, I have this following query. I want to source a common file between these two scripts to ensure that if the package cant automatically detect sane values, it prompt the us

common source package for use in Debian and Ubuntu

2011-01-17 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! as suggested in this bug report for "lilo": http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602824 and introduced with: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/05/managing-distribution-specific-patches-with-a-common-source-package/ I want to realize the idea of a debian directory usable for Debi

Re: HOWTO: Source a common shell script between DEBIAN/config and DEBIAN/preinst

2011-01-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, your questions are probably better answered on debian-mentors@lists.debian.org. On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, harish badrinath wrote: > Given that i was told that you can deterministically determine which > file would run first DEBIAN/control _or_ DEBIAN/preinst, I have this > following query. You me