All right ...
I've switched "Seeking a sponsor" @ mentors to "No" and the bug already has
been tagged as "pending"
... anything else?
BTW I can't find the packet @ http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ nor
http://incoming.debian.org/ but
it's on the list @ http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html ...
Il 04/01/2011 8.57, Daniel Stender ha scritto:
> BTW I can't find the packet @ http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ nor
> http://incoming.debian.org/ but
> it's on the list @ http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html ... what's the
> reason?
Package is currently in NEW queue, so it's been sponsored alr
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "failmalloc".
* Package name: failmalloc
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Yoshinori K. Okuji
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/failmalloc
* License : LGPL-2+
Section : utils
It builds these binary
Hi Sven,
thank you very much for your thoughts!
Also hi to Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta and Stephen Gran. I added you two to
CC for you maintain openvpn and freeradius. The openvpn-auth-radius
package is to combine these packages. Sven was uncomfortable with it
being maintained by a company and sugge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-04 12:31, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "failmalloc".
>
Hey
Thanks for your interest in Debian. This is indeed an interesting
library. :)
> * Package name: failmalloc
> V
I've updated my package. Please have a look.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/free42/free42_1.4.66-1.dsc
Jean.
--
Jean Schurger
http://schurger.org
GPG: http://schurger.org/jean.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:21:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I thinking that devel might be a better section than utils. Particularly
> the devel section covers "Development utilities" according to [1].
Agreed.
> Any particular reason for Build-Depending on autotools-dev? It does not
> appear
Hi *,
I'm maintaining a library which new upstream version is creating at build time
*.la, *.so (development symlink), and the library itself with the form
libfoo-x.y.z.so but not their symlinks that match their SONAME (I was
expecting something like libfoo.so.X).
My question is if it'd be safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-04 16:40, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:21:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I thinking that devel might be a better section than utils. Particularly
>> the devel section covers "Development utilities" according
* Muammar El Khatib [110104 16:52]:
> I'm maintaining a library which new upstream version is creating at build time
> *.la, *.so (development symlink), and the library itself with the form
> libfoo-x.y.z.so but not their symlinks that match their SONAME (I was
> expecting something like libfoo.so
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:31:54PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Not quite correct. Lintian allows you to B-D on autotools-dev (among
> others) to suppress this warning. Adding it to B-D makes lintian skip
> the check entirely (yupe, I did look it up in the lintain source[1]). As
> I recall you can
Hi!
Darren Hoo writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "abcl".
>
> * Package name: abcl
> Version : 0.23.1
> Upstream Author : ABCL development team and contributors
> * URL : http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear/
> * License : GPL
> Programm
Hi Bernhard,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:36:37PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Muammar El Khatib [110104 16:52]:
> > I'm maintaining a library which new upstream version is creating at build
> > time
> > *.la, *.so (development symlink), and the library itself with the form
> > libfoo-x.y.z.
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:09:11PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:31:54PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Not quite correct. Lintian allows you to B-D on autotools-dev (among
> > others) to suppress this warning. Adding it to B-D makes lintian skip
> > the check entir
14 matches
Mail list logo
