Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

2010-10-31 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Gabriele, > On 10/31/2010 01:00 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > I did a quick review: > > > > 1) Please rename the source package to ubiquity-extension (or > Done > Thank you for not making another flamefest out of that one. [...] > > > 3) "${xpi:Recommends} (>= 3.6)" doesn't work, because

Re: RFS: ovito

2010-10-31 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi again, [...] > > > I did't do much checking to see where you got it from, but you might > > want to update the debian/watch file as well. > > Actually I believe the debian/watch should work as it is. That is my > first debian/watch file, though, so I'd like to ask you to double > check it i

Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response

2010-10-31 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit : > > I think this is a superb step in the right direction; while clearly the list > on > mentors.debian.net, as suggested in another email in this thread, is the more > comprehensive list of packages in need of sponsorship, thi

Re: RFS: morse (New upstream release)

2010-10-31 Thread Nanakos Chrysostomos
Thanks. On 31 Οκτ 2010, at 3:44, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: I agree in the most part. I have added the suggested changelog entries and reuploaded the package to mentors. I hope this is fine now. Uploaded. I've wrapp

Re: roxterm resizing bug serious enough for freeze exception?

2010-10-31 Thread Wen-Yen Chuang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony Houghton wrote: > With some window managers and/or when closing many roxterm tabs rapidly > with keyboard auto-repeat, closing tabs may cause the window to shrink, I am the upstream author and Debian package maintainer of evilvte. As far as I kn

Re: Request for voluntary package reviews

2010-10-31 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:03:27AM +0200, chrysn wrote: > > concerning the midish package: > > i've had a look at the midish package mentioned in [1]. it seems to be > packaged in a reasonable way. > > the only potential issue i've spottet is that Willem van Engen, > co-author of mdep_alsa.c, is

RFS: balazarbrothers (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Tony Palma
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0~rc1-5 of my package "balazarbrothers". It builds these binary packages: balazarbrothers - 3D puzzle game The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 4531075, 08252, 560100, 581302 The package can b

Re: RFS: balazarbrothers (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Tony Palma
El Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:14:48 -0600 Tony Palma escribió: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0~rc1-5 > of my package "balazarbrothers". > > It builds these binary packages: > balazarbrothers - 3D puzzle game > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The

Re: RFS: calcoo (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:13:24AM -0500, Tony Palma a écrit : > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.18-3 > of my package "calcoo". Just a upgrade. > > It builds these binary packages: > calcoo - Scientific calculator (GTK+) Dear Tony, I had a look at calcoo and your change

Re: RFS: balazarbrothers (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Paul Wise
A review... In exchange for this review, I would be very appreciative if you could review one of the recent RFS from this list and reply in the thread for it. This is entirely optional of course. You might want to consider joining the Debian Games Team, maintain balazarbrothers there and help us

Re: roxterm resizing bug serious enough for freeze exception?

2010-10-31 Thread Tony Houghton
On 31/10/10 09:18, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Tony Houghton wrote: With some window managers and/or when closing many roxterm tabs rapidly with keyboard auto-repeat, closing tabs may cause the window to shrink, I am the upstream author and Debian package maintainer of evilvte. As far as I know, al

Re: RFS: balazarbrothers (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > A review... Two things I forgot: Please upload a new screenshot, the current one is in French and is very small: http://screenshots.debian.net/package/balazarbrothers Please review the debtags and add any appropriate ones: http://debtags.al

RFS: ttf-isabella (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Tony Palma
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-1 of my package "ttf-isabella". Isabella now has 863 characters; according to fc-query, it supports 140 different scripts. It builds these binary packages: ttf-isabella - The Isabella free TrueType font The package appears to be l

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-31 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
2010/10/26 Scott Howard > 2010/10/24 Enrique Hernández Bello : > > What is the next step? :) > > -- > > Enrique Hernández Bello > > > > Hi Enrique, > > I'm not a DD yet, but I learned a lot from sponsors being extremely > picky about my packages. Here are some comments for you to consider: > > 1)

RFS: ttf-staypuft (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Tony Palma
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.04-4 of my package "ttf-staypuft". It builds these binary packages: ttf-staypuft - The Stay-Puft free TrueType font The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debia

Re: RFS: ttf-isabella (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:23:00AM -0600, Tony Palma a écrit : > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-1 > of my package "ttf-isabella". Isabella now has 863 characters; > according to fc-query, it supports 140 different scripts. Hi Tony, have you checked with the Debian Fonts Tas

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-31 Thread Fernando Lemos
Hi, 2010/10/31 Enrique Hernández Bello : >> This is your first release, and version 0.4.3b-1 makes sense to me as >> the first debian packaging released. >> > > If I don't increment the release number, I can't upload it to mentors > repository. What do you suggest? What is the common way to versio

Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response

2010-10-31 Thread Scott Howard
Hello, On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Unfortunately, proposals such as the collaborative package review by Charles > Plessy [2] haven't caught any attention. In particular, this is a call to > people > not being DD (yet): Everyone could review packages, but it just

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-31 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
2010/10/31 Fernando Lemos > Hi, > > 2010/10/31 Enrique Hernández Bello : > >> This is your first release, and version 0.4.3b-1 makes sense to me as > >> the first debian packaging released. > >> > > > > If I don't increment the release number, I can't upload it to mentors > > repository. What do

Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response

2010-10-31 Thread Paul Wise
Perhaps (hopefully) this initiative will change the culture of this list. I'll certainly try to remember to point out when people are ignoring non-DDs input. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response

2010-10-31 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> Perhaps (hopefully) this initiative will change the culture of this > list. I'll certainly try to remember to point out when people are > ignoring non-DDs input. > Me too, probably I'll even refrain from sponsoring should I note such behavior. Best regards, Michael pgpWQgPPBsI8a.pgp Descrip

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

2010-10-31 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 02:51 +0200 schrieb Gabriele Giacone: > > 1) Please rename the source package to ubiquity-extension (or > Done Can you rename the git repository too? > > 3) "${xpi:Recommends} (>= 3.6)" doesn't work, because multiple items > > could be generated. If you want versioned

Re: RFS: ovito

2010-10-31 Thread Pekko Metsä
Hi and thanks! On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > You might want to ask upstream whether they wouldn't even want to > release such archives themselves instead of asking people to do svn > checkouts. Yes, I will. > Built & uploaded (but will have to wait in NEW, probabl

Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response

2010-10-31 Thread The Fungi
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:49:25AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Personally I believe that Noel's statement is relates to upstream, > who have their own packaging + their own little repository as > compared to upstreams like you, who also work on the Debian side. [...] Which was more or less my po

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-31 Thread Scott Howard
Thanks for packaging fritzing, btw - it's a good tool to have in Debian. 2010/10/31 Enrique Hernández Bello : > 2010/10/26 Scott Howard >> 2010/10/24 Enrique Hernández Bello : >> 1) instead of CDBS and explicitly using quilt, would you consider >> using source format 3.0 (quilt) and debhelper 7 [

Re: RFS: ovito

2010-10-31 Thread Paul Wise
2010/11/1 Pekko Metsä : > Surely you're joking..  Just few hours ago I got my very first Debian > package uploaded to NEW queue.  I'll definitely be more like needing > a mentor than able to instruct others here still quite some time. It is never too early to start reviewing packages :) Sure, yo

watch file and kde-looks

2010-10-31 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
Hello mentors. I am trying to edit properly watch file in order tu be able to use uscan but i can't do it. I've tried a lot of combinations with no results. I tought that th solution was going to be with downloadurlmangle option but i still have no results I don't know if it's posible to configur

Re: watch file and kde-looks

2010-10-31 Thread Simon Paillard
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:28:29AM +0100, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > I am trying to edit properly watch file in order tu be able to use uscan but > i can't do it. > I've tried a lot of combinations with no results. I tought that th solution > was going to be with downloadurlmangle option but

Re: watch file and kde-looks

2010-10-31 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
2010/11/1 Simon Paillard > > > Which is the canonical place where the author publish the tarball ? > > There is no canonical place, The author uses debian sid, and he published the tarball in kde-look: http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Wicd+Client+KDE?content=132366 Something like > http://

Re: watch file and kde-looks

2010-10-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:28:29AM +0100, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: >> I don't know if it's posible to configure it with kde-look. > > Which is the canonical place where the author publish the tarball ? An example: http://kde-look.org/c

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

2010-10-31 Thread Gabriele Giacone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/31/2010 05:54 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 02:51 +0200 schrieb Gabriele Giacone: >>> 1) Please rename the source package to ubiquity-extension (or >> Done > > Can you rename the git repository too? Renamed. >>> 3) "${

Re: watch file and kde-looks

2010-10-31 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
2010/11/1 Paul Wise > > You might be able to use the tan variable, but there is no indication > in the href as to what version a particular tan corresponds to. > > > The URLs listed there don't contain tags but commit SHA-1s so that > wouldn't work. > > It would be a good idea to ask gitorious.o

Re: watch file and kde-looks

2010-10-31 Thread Paul Wise
2010/11/1 Iker Salmón San Millán : > So, at least for now the best i can do it's to fill watch file with comments > describing the situation, isn't it? Yep, and send an email to gitorious. SInce their website code is free software, you could also send them a patch if you have time ;) -- bye, pa

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Hi I did take a look at your package. Some comments: · debian/changelog: There is a space missing in the last line. I am a bit confused, I don't understand this · debian/compat: You build-depend on debhelper 7, but use compat level 5. Is that intentional? · debian/rules: - dh_a