Karl Goetz writes:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:22:19 +0100
> Iustin Pop wrote:
>
> > When building/uploading packages for unstable, you *must* use an
> > unstable environment (including lintian). If you're running testing
> > on your machine, then the build/verification should be done in an
> > uns
Ben Finney writes:
> For such a package, you must build and test using the latest packages
> from Debian ‘unstable’ suite (== ‘sid’), and nothing else suffices.
This of course is relative to whichever suite of Debian one is uploading
the package to. If one is uploading the package to a different
Hi,
Christoph Egger wrote:
> At Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:57:14 +0100,
[...]
>
> Regards
>
> Christoph
>
Thanks for all the answers. And everybody else (include Christoph)
thanks for pointing out that I should use unstable/sid for developing.
This isn't a problem because I'm using a vi
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:25:30 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Karl Goetz wrote:
>
> > I assume when you say 'unstable environment' you don't exclude the
> > possibility of using a backported lintian on (say) stable.
>
> I'd specifically exclude that. You need to build
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Karl Goetz wrote:
> I was thinking of a case where the package is built in a sid pbuilder
> (I should probably have clarified that).
Ah, ok.
> Sadly testing it only has one option - run sid :/
Strictly speaking you should test on whatever distribution you're
up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Dne Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:42:49 +0200
Nanakos Chrysostomos napsal(a):
> - - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpg321/mpg321_0.2.11-1.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> Help is appreciated if anythi
Hi
Dne Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:15:58 +0100
Thibaut GRIDEL napsal(a):
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.6-9
> of orphaned package "giflib".
>
> It closes ITA #543841 which I updated earlier this week-end.
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> giflib-dbg - library for GIF images (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Dne Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:50:36 +0100
Michal Čihař napsal(a):
> > - - dget
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpg321/mpg321_0.2.11-1.dsc
> >
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> > Help is appreciated if anyt
Hello mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "graphy".
* Package name: graphy
Version : 1.0+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Google Inc.
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/graphy/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : python
It builds these binary packages
Hello mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "namebench".
* Package name: namebench
Version : 1.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Thomas R. Stromberg
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/namebench/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : python
It builds the
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Also please don't write your surname in capitals, I see no reason for
> that.
There was a short conversation about this practice on pkg-fonts-devel
and planet.d.o recently:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/2009-Dece
Hi again!
Bug #563236 has been fixed, easyMp3Gain should build now.
Regards
Matthias Klumpp
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/easymp3gain
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-fre
Hi again!
Bug #563236 has been fixed, easyMp3Gain should build now.
Regards
Matthias Klumpp
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/easymp3gain
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-fre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Klumpp schrieb:
> Hi again!
> Bug #563236 has been fixed, easyMp3Gain should build now.
> Regards
> Matthias Klumpp
>
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/easymp3gain
> -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/1/2010 17:02, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dne Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:50:36 +0100 Michal ihaY
> napsal(a):
>
>>> - - dget
>>>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpg321/mpg321_0.2.11-1.dsc
>
>
>>
>>> I would be glad if someone uploaded
Hi!
> P: easymp3gain source: source-contains-svn-control-dir lang/.svn
> - - Just notify and punch upstream, to remove the .svn dirs with his next
> release tarballs prop.
Woops! Why wasn't this information shown to mee too? Maybe I should update
my lintian...
> W: easymp3gain-gtk: binary-without
Hi, Mattias.
On Jan 11 2010, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> easyMp3Gain is a GUI application, it does not have any command line
> arguments.
Then, please just state it for people using the manpages. The first
thing that I do when I get a new package is to look at the manpage of
the main executable.
(W
Hi!
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:28:55 -0200, Rogério Brito
wrote:
> Hi, Mattias.
>
> On Jan 11 2010, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> easyMp3Gain is a GUI application, it does not have any command line
>> arguments.
>
> Then, please just state it for people using the manpages. The first
> thing that I do w
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.00-2
of my package "tesseract-eng".
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract-ocr-eng - tesseract-ocr language files for English text
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 562195
The package can
Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
>
> Hi,
> debian/changelog fixed.
> debian/watch file added.
>
> That piece of code was there from 0.2.10.3 version, my mistake. Now
> uses postinst from 0.2.10.6 (the latest one).
> Uploaded again in mentors website [0].
>
>
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
> [0]:
> http://men
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/1/2010 23:48, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> debian/changelog fixed.
>> debian/watch file added.
>>
>> That piece of code was there from 0.2.10.3 version, my mistake. Now
>> uses postinst from 0.2.10.6 (the late
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/1/2010 23:48, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
>>
>> Hi, debian/changelog fixed. debian/watch file added.
>>
>> That piece of code was there from 0.2.10.3 version, my mistake.
>> Now uses postinst from 0.2.10.6 (the latest one
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 14:00 +, Seger, Mark wrote:
> Is there any standard (or desired format). Since I intend to include
> both my release notes and an automatically generated changelog, it
> should be pretty easy to create the log headers in any format people
> would like to see.
As an up
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 09:43 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Bernd Schubert
> wrote:
>
> > Lintian -pendantic complains with:
> >
> > I: collectl source: build-depends-without-arch-dep bash
> ...
> > I'm not sure what to do about the new "build-depends-without-arch-dep".
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "acetoneiso".
* Package name: acetoneiso
Version : 2.2.1-0ubuntu1
Upstream Author : Fabrizio Di Marco and Marco Di Antonio
* URL : http://www.acetoneteam.org/
* License : GPLv3
Section : otherosf
Howdy mentors,
I am seeking a sponsor for release 0.2.10-2 of my package, ‘gracie’.
It builds the following binary package:
gracie - OpenID server for local PAM accounts
This release fixes the following bugs:
519623 557089
It also updates the source package format to “3.0 (quilt)”.
P
Tim Retout writes:
> This is correct; however, having read bug #552200, I'm not yet
> personally convinced that it deserved to be removed. If the package
> later added some arch-dependent binary packages, it would be nice to be
> consistent.
The basic problem is that while there's potentially s
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The basic problem is that while there's potentially some use to the idea
> of separating out architecture-independent build requirements, Lintian
> wasn't really checking that. In order to support this, you have to very
> carefully structure
Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> On 11/1/2010 23:48, Barry deFreese wrote:
>> Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> debian/changelog fixed.
>>> debian/watch file added.
>>>
>>> That piece of code was there from 0.2.10.3 version, my mistake. Now
>>> uses postinst from 0.2.10.6 (the latest one).
>>> U
Paul Wise writes:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The basic problem is that while there's potentially some use to the
>> idea of separating out architecture-independent build requirements,
>> Lintian wasn't really checking that. In order to support this, you
>> have to
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Doesn't that break regular builds? Or does calling the binary target then
> clean it up by going back to run build-indep?
The in mapserver back then binary-indep/install-indep targets depended
on build-indep and the buildds call binary-arc
Paul Wise writes:
> When that change occurs, there will be 2 kinds of buildds; the one that
> builds the arch all and arch any packages and the ones that
> builds. These will obviously be different for different packages, I
> imagine the fastest arches will be chosen for the build-arch independen
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hm, isn't the obvious and simple way of implementing this change to just
> create a second class of buildds that do exactly what the current ones do
> but then throw out all the arch-dependent packages and only keep the
> arch-independent one
33 matches
Mail list logo
