Re: RFS: colorcode

2009-11-08 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:22:42PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "colorcode". > * Package name: colorcode > Version : 0.5.5-1 > Upstream Author : Dirk Laebisch > * URL : http://colorcode.laebisch.com/ > * License : GP

Re: RFS: acx100 (updated package)

2009-11-08 Thread M. van Brummelen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Patrick, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > M. van Brummelen schrieb: >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/acx100/acx100_20080210-1.1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Martijn van Bru

Re: RFS: acx100 (updated package)

2009-11-08 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 No need to CC me, I am subscribed to the list. M. van Brummelen schrieb: >>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/acx100/acx100_20080210-1.1.dsc >>> Like suggested on irc I used bts for bug #545367 which is grave. >> Thanks. > >> Please pi

RFS: enscript (updated package)

2009-11-08 Thread Tim Retout
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.4-14 of my package "enscript". It builds these binary packages: enscript - converts text to Postscript, HTML or RTF with syntax highlighting The package appears to be lintian clean. (Actually, this upload is mostly about fixing

How to document "special" copyright cases (dual-licensing granted by upstream)

2009-11-08 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Hi, I've had one package (congruity) which has been rejected recently because of a slight issue with one file not fully complying with the DFSG (CC-BY-SA 2.5 rather than 3.0), and working on another (ethos) for which the documentation would be non-free... What is the proper way of reporting the f

Re: How to document "special" copyright cases (dual-licensing granted by upstream)

2009-11-08 Thread Ben Finney
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre writes: > What is the proper way of reporting the fact that I've got upstream to > agree to dual-licensing of some files? Surely this information needs > to be documented somewhere in the package? Yes, this is exactly the purpose of the ‘copyright’ file. Document the prec

Re: RFS: kanjisaver (updated package)

2009-11-08 Thread Barry deFreese
Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.11-1 > of my package "kanjisaver". > > It builds these binary packages: > kanjisaver - Japanese kanji screensaver > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 510529