On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:17:35AM +0800, tangke wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openpref".
>
> * Package name: openpref
> Version : 0.1.3-2
> Upstream Author : annu...@users.sourceforge.net
> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/project
> Hi mentors,
Hi,
> Paul Gevers wrote:
> > I am looking for a thourough check of my packaging and preferably a
> > sponsor for the new version 1:0.95.2-1 of my package "lesstif2" [0].
> > This new upstream version is only the incorporation of a lot of patches
> > already incorporated in the curr
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.5-1 of my package "usb-
modeswitch" - mode switching tool for controlling "flip flop" USB devices.
The upload would fix these bugs: 527122, 535445. By the way, the package has
seen big updates both upstream and Debian side. It fixe
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:14:30 -0300, Felipe Sateler
wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 20:38 +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "algoscore".
>
> Some comments, I'm no DD so I can't upload.
>
> * liblo-dev exists currently only in experiment
Hello mentors,
thanks to all for your suggestions.
In the version I just duploaded:
- tarball contains svn version
- debian/copyright is in DEP-5 format
- source package format is "3.0 (quilt)" (the only lintian error)
- PNGs didn't change. I'm trying to contact the icons creator asking him
to re
Dear mentors,
since 08.03.2005, the Debian packages related to the JED editor are
collaborative maintained in a project at Alioth
(http://pkg-jed.alioth.debian.org/,
http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-jed).
However, after the retirement of the group leader, there is no DD left in
the group.
I
Sorry about the lateness of my reply.
Reviewed and uploaded.
Not sure if you've used zzuf before, but you might want to use it to
discover possible bugs that could lead to crashes/etc in lbzip2.
helgrind (and the other valgrind tools) might be useful to find bugs:
http://valgrind.org/info/tools
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
Reviewed and uploaded.
Thank you!
Not sure if you've used zzuf before, but you might want to use it to
discover possible bugs that could lead to crashes/etc in lbzip2.
Thanks for the tip. I didn't use zzuf, but I did do fuzz testing, as early
as 0.02.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:57:28PM -0400, Andrew SB wrote:
>> But I haven't seen the package show up in either NEW (where I assume
>> it will have to go through as it introduces a new binary), incoming,
>> or the archive. Is the package bein
Luca Falavigna ha scritto:
> see [1]
where [1] is http://lists.debian.org/debian-dak/2009/11/msg00034.html :)
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
I am trying to address bug #544573 [1] against rkhunter which I
maintain.
rkhunter postinst script is used to call rkhunter --propupd which
updates/creates its file properties database.
rkhunter recommends some packages, eg. unhide, which are configured
after rkhunter, and hence after rkhunt
2009/11/4 Luca Falavigna :
> Luca Falavigna ha scritto:
>> see [1]
>
> where [1] is http://lists.debian.org/debian-dak/2009/11/msg00034.html :)
OK, sure. But does anyone know what "NO NEW PROCESSING CURRENTLY
AVAILABLE" actually means in practice? Do it mean that no packages
will be moved out of N
Andrew SB ha scritto:
> It still hasn't shown up. Perhaps it got lost in the churn? As the
> ftp-master's meeting is now over, should it be re-uploaded?
Please hold your breath for a little bit more, some services are not
available yet (one of them is NEW processing, see [1]), so some related
web
Andrew SB ha scritto:
> It still hasn't shown up. Perhaps it got lost in the churn? As the
> ftp-master's meeting is now over, should it be re-uploaded?
Please hold your breath for a little bit more, some services are not
available yet (one of them is NEW processing, see [1]), so some related
web
Barry deFreese wrote:
> Uploaded thanks.
Thank you.
> Probably should remove the empty dirs but that's not a serious
> issue.
I hesitated, because it seems to me the package will fail to build
when the woe32 plugins are to be built. (I haven't tried, though.)
> Also, your changelog is a bit w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.92.1-1
of my package "gem".
It builds these binary packages:
gem- Graphics Environment for Multimedia - PureData library
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload wo
IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.92.1-1
> of my package "gem".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> gem- Graphics Environment for Multimedia - PureData library
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload w
17 matches
Mail list logo
