RFS:openpref

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openpref". * Package name: openpref Version : 0.1.3-1+nmu1 Upstream Author : * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpref/ * License : GPLV3 Section : games It builds these binary packages

request for review/sponsorship: gem-0.92.1-1.1

Dear Mentors, I kindly request you to review the package gem: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gem It builds these binary packages: gem- Graphics Environment for Multimedia - PureData library Changes - The package appears to be lintian clean. - The upload would fix these b

Re: RFS:openpref

tangke wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openpref". > > openpref - OpenPref is open source game > I did not look at the package, but let me start by pointing out that this description is essentially useless. First, no need to mention that it's open source.

RFS: wxglade (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.3-2 of my package "wxglade". It builds these binary packages: python-wxglade - GUI designer written in Python with wxPython The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 501710, 533547, 537452, 552784

Re: RFS: csv2latex (updated package)

Hola ben! El 28/10/2009 a las 19:41 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-2 > of my package "csv2latex". > It builds these binary packages: > csv2latex - a CSV to LaTeX file converter > The package appears to be lintian clean. > The package can be found on mentors.d

Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements

Raphael Geissert writes: >> Pedantic tags are Lintian at its most pickiest and include >> checks for particular Debian packaging styles, *checks that are >> very frequently wrong*, and checks that many people disagree >> with. Expect false positives and Lintian ta

Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements

Rogério Brito writes: > On Oct 22 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Manoj Srivastava wrote: >>> I also think that style issues should not be a part of even >>> Pedantic checks. If a package is using a different, and arguably >>> better style, then lintian should keep its nose out. >> If

Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements

Hi, Russ. On Oct 29 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: > That was actually most of the point of pedantic. Minor possible bugs > that aren't stylistic belong in info instead. That's why both of them > are suppressed by default. OK. Nice. Please keep them there. We can just treat them as pedantic and not

RFS:pokerclock

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pokerclock". * Package name: pokerclock Version : 1.0.4-1+nmu1 Upstream Author : xes * URL : http://www.xesnet.fr/ * License : GPLV3 Section : games It builds these binary packages: pokercloc

RFS:openpref (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openpref". * Package name: openpref Version : 0.1.3-1+nmu1 Upstream Author : annu...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpref/ * License : GPLV3 Section : games I

Re: RFS:openpref (updated package)

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:34 AM, tangke wrote: >   Version : 0.1.3-1+nmu1 Why is this listed as a Non-Maintainer Upload (NMU) when you are the maintainer of the package? I strongly suggest you read the maint-guide, developers-reference and debian-policy before proceeding. -- bye, pabs

Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements

Rogério Brito writes: > On Oct 29 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: >> That was actually most of the point of pedantic. Minor possible bugs >> that aren't stylistic belong in info instead. That's why both of them >> are suppressed by default. > OK. Nice. Please keep them there. We can just treat them