Re: script-not-executable

2009-10-04 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Ben Finney JM> > Ok. Can I make override for it. BF> You *can* make an override for any warnings. The warnings are there for BF> good reasons, though, so you shouldn't ignore them without a good BF> understanding of why, and an even better reason why the warning doesn't BF> apply. BF> You

Re: python-support

2009-10-04 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Paul Wise - > Please read the output of lintian-info --tags > executable-not-elf-or-script and act accordingly. I'll try thank you regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Mozldap/ldapsdk package for Debian

2009-10-04 Thread Morenisco
Hi, I'm trying to build project-389 on Debian, and I need the mozldap (ldapsdk) package for Debian. I searched for it in Alioth, but it isn't. Is there a known repository for this package please? Regards. -- Morenisco. Centro de Difusión del Software Libre. http://www.cdsl.cl http://www.fola

RFS: kallery (updated package, QA upload, 2nd try)

2009-10-04 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.0-4 of my package "kallery". It builds these binary packages: kallery- Image gallery generator for the KDE kallery-data - kallery's architecture independent data The package appears to be lintian clean (except for the 3 overrid

Re: Mozldap/ldapsdk package for Debian

2009-10-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Morenisco wrote: > I'm trying to build project-389 on Debian, and I need the mozldap (ldapsdk) > package for Debian. I searched for it in Alioth, but it isn't. > Is there a known repository for this package please? You might want to contact Michele Baldessari and

RFS: gip (updated package, adopting, 2nd try)

2009-10-04 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.0-1-1 of my package "gip". I am adopting this package. It builds these binary packages: gip- IP calculator for GNOME desktop environment The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 474969, 54

Some guidance with library package building

2009-10-04 Thread Alfonso Ruzafa
Hello, I request the help of a mentor to aid me with some package building issue. Currently I'm developing a library and a command line tool with Autotools. I have 3 directories: lib for the library code, include for the headers and src for the command tool code. Then I decided to build a Debian p

Re: Some guidance with library package building

2009-10-04 Thread Harry Rickards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/10/09 14:54, Alfonso Ruzafa wrote: > But this copies ALL files and directories and the 2 .deb generated > packages contains all .so, .a and .h files. Then I found 2 files: > libfoo1.install and libfoo-dev.install that are but patterns for files

Re: Some guidance with library package building

2009-10-04 Thread Alfonso Ruzafa
I tried but it seems libfoo.install and libfoo-dev.install contents doesn't have any filter effect. Despite of the contents of these files (as pattern: lib*.so*, full name: libfoo.so.0.1.0 or full path name: /usr/lib/libfoo.so.0.1.0) debuild always collected all files placed in libfoo and libfoo-de

Re: Some guidance with library package building

2009-10-04 Thread Harry Rickards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/10/09 15:33, Alfonso Ruzafa wrote: > I tried but it seems libfoo.install and libfoo-dev.install contents > doesn't have any filter effect. Despite of the contents of these files > (as pattern: lib*.so*, full name: libfoo.so.0.1.0 or full path nam

Re: Some guidance with library package building

2009-10-04 Thread Alfonso Ruzafa
Nevermind. After read the debhelper documentation I uncommented the dh_install line in the debian/rules Makefile: binary-arch: install ... ... dh_install ... ... Now all files copied in debian/tmp are copied to proper directories libfoo and libfoo-dev applying the libfoo.install and libfoo-d

Re: Some guidance with library package building

2009-10-04 Thread Harry Rickards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/10/09 17:07, Alfonso Ruzafa wrote: > Nevermind. > > After read the debhelper documentation I uncommented the dh_install line > in the debian/rules Makefile: > > binary-arch: install > ... > ... > dh_install > ... > ... > > Now all files co

RFS: rubyripper

2009-10-04 Thread Andreas Heck
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rubyripper". It provides a cli and gui program to rip CDs. Contrary to most other CD rippers it does multiple reads and tries to create exact copies if possible, even if the CD is corrupted (by coincidence or otherwise). * Package name

Re: presumable last policy change before releasing Squeeze?

2009-10-04 Thread ERSEK Laszlo
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Paul Wise wrote: So as long as it is uploaded before the freeze date you should be fine. Thank you. Most Standards-Version updates are of the form "Bump Standards-Version, no changes needed" and such updates should not be done unless they accompany some other update like

Nota Fiscal Eletronica, SPED Fiscal, SPED Contabil

2009-10-04 Thread Sara Macedo
== TREINAMENTO MODULAR Nota Fiscal Eletrônica SPED Fiscal SPED Contábil 11, 12 e 13 de novembro de 2009 - São Paulo == OBJETIVO Prepara

RFS: simple-xml

2009-10-04 Thread Fabian Köster
From: Fabian Köster To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: simple-xml Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "simple-xml". * Package name: simple-xml Version : 2.1.4-1 Upstream Author : Niall Gallagher * URL : http://simple.sourceforge.

Re: Some guidance with library package building

2009-10-04 Thread Alfonso Ruzafa
Hi, I continue with some doubts :( Actually I'm building 3 packages: libfoo for the library, libfoo-dev for the development files and a third foo package for the command line tool to deal with the library. I added this info to debian/control Package: foo Priority: extra Maintainer: Alfonso Ruzaf

RFS: moodbar (NMU)

2009-10-04 Thread Andrew SB
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of the package "moodbar". The upload would fix these bugs: 494938 It resolves that bug as well as a number of other issues. Most important of those is dropping the recommends on amarok. The moodbar plugin has not yet been ported to the amarok 2.

Re: presumable last policy change before releasing Squeeze?

2009-10-04 Thread Ben Finney
ERSEK Laszlo writes: > This is tedious and doesn't bring anything to users, so instead of > rushing it and possibly making several Policy rounds until Squeeze > ships Don't do that. It's deprecated practice to have an upload that *only* addresses Standards-Version; it should only ever be updated

script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello mentors, I have output this output from lintian: -- W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/lv2rack.py W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynjacku.py W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynspect.py -- I tried (one by one)

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:32:50AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hello mentors, > > I have output this output from lintian: > -- > W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/lv2rack.py > W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynjacku.py > W: zynjacku: script-with

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
From: Jose Luis Rivas JM> I have output this output from lintian: JM> -- JM> W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/lv2rack.py JM> W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynjacku.py JM> W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynspect.py JM>

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Monday 05,October,2009 08:48 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > I did it, but it breaks functionality ... there exist also symlinks with same > name and in same location. > > usr/bin/lv2rack > usr/bin/zynjacku > usr/bin/zynspect > -- > usr/bin/lv2rack.py > usr/bin/zynjacku.py > usr/bin/zynspect.py

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Chow Loong Jin JM> > I did it, but it breaks functionality ... there exist also symlinks with same JM> name and in same location. JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku JM> > usr/bin/zynspect JM> > -- JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack.py JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku.py JM> > usr/bin/zynspect.py >

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Jaromír Mikeš JM> > I did it, but it breaks functionality ... there exist also symlinks with JM> same name and in same location. JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku JM> > usr/bin/zynspect JM> > -- JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack.py JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku.py JM> > usr/bin/zynspect.py CL

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Monday 05,October,2009 09:43 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > BTW: error message for lv2rack is: > --- > $ lv2rack > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/lv2rack", line 52, in > import zynjacku as zynjacku > -- > > I got warning from other mailing list that this package

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 03:43:22AM +0200, Jarom?r Mike? wrote: > > Od: Jarom?r Mike? > > JM> > I did it, but it breaks functionality ... there exist also symlinks with > JM> same name and in same location. > > JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack > JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku > JM> > usr/bin/zynspect > JM> > --

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Chow Loong Jin > You should probably try reading the Debian Python New Policy[1] and getting > help > from #debian-python on OFTC or debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org. > > [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy I didn't know that there is debian-python list, I will try ask there.

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Matthew Palmer JM> > I did it, but it breaks functionality ... there exist also symlinks JM> > with same name and in same location. JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku JM> > usr/bin/zynspect JM> > -- JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack.py JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku.py JM> > usr/bin/zynspect.py

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Ben Finney
Matthew Palmer writes: > So someone's using a single file as both a library and a stand-alone > program. Damned silly idea. Not so silly; a Python module can be useful both as a main program and as a re-useable component in other programs. The well-known Python idiom of testing ‘if __name__ == '

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Ben Finney MP> > Stick zynjacku.py in a proper library path somewhere, and write a MP> > little shim wrapper to stick in /usr/bin that calls zynjacku as it MP> > expects to be called. BF> Yes, that's one way to do it, and quite valid. It does, though, involve BF> creating that shim separa

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Ben Finney
Jaromír Mikeš writes: > Any link where I can study more to understand and solve problem? The ‘debian-python’ forum already mentioned, and the documentation (such as it is) for the popular third-party ‘setuptools’ extension for the Python distutils. -- \ “I think it would be a good idea.”

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:12 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 03:43:22AM +0200, Jarom?r Mike? wrote: > > > Od: Jarom?r Mike? > > > > JM> > I did it, but it breaks functionality ... there exist also symlinks > > with > > JM> same name and in same location. > > > > JM> > usr/

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 01:44:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Matthew Palmer writes: > > > So someone's using a single file as both a library and a stand-alone > > program. Damned silly idea. > > Not so silly; a Python module can be useful both as a main program and > as a re-useable component i

Re: script-with-language-extension

2009-10-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:32:50AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš a écrit : > Hello mentors, > > I have output this output from lintian: > -- > W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/lv2rack.py > W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynjacku.py > W: zynjacku: script-w

Re: MUMmer patches and Artistic license.

2009-10-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:41:05AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Hi, thank you for the comment. > > > > I will stop to apply this patch until a better solution is found. > > Charles, could you please give an update of the stat

Re: MUMmer patches and Artistic license.

2009-10-04 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hi, thank you for the comment. > > I will stop to apply this patch until a better solution is found. Charles, could you please give an update of the status of mummer package? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de