Hi,
One of my packages, gforth, is having a weird FTBFS on hppa and
a not-so-weird FTBFS on s390. A couple of weeks ago I asked here
about help with a mips/mipsel problem, and two people kindly pointed
out qemu as a way to (slowly, but still something) test things on
different architectures. Thi
Hi.
IANADD and have not seen the package, but something has bugged me once
when I was looking for some terminal programs:
On Sep 02 2009, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Description: an VTE based super lightweight terminal emulator
Shouldn't the field start with "a V
Hi.
On Aug 29 2009, Rogério Brito wrote:
> I just updated the package "mondo" and this fixes an RC bug.
This was kindly sponsored by Li Daobing.
Thanks, Rogério Brito.
--
Rogério Brito : rbr...@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8
http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mack
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:06:48 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Description: an VTE based super lightweight terminal emulator
> Shouldn't the field start with "a VTE..." instead?
Actually it should start without an article :)
Short descriptions are supposed to work as "noun phrases" or "is a"
phras
Hi, Hideki.
On Sep 01 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:29:44 -0300
> Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Architectures: all [! kfreebsd-i386, ! kfreebsd-amd64, ! hurd-i386]
> ^^^any?
Yes, of course.
> That's what I want! What is needed to do so? Who can do that?
It se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.3-1
of my package "abr2gbr".
It builds these binary packages:
abr2gbr- Converts PhotoShop brushes to GIMP
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.34-2 of my new package
of "windowlab". It builds this binary package:
windowlab - Small and simple Amiga-like window manager
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/w
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iceweasel-useragentswitcher".
* Package name: iceweasel-useragentswitcher
Version : 0.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Chris Pederick
* URL : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/59
* License : GPL
Se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gerix-wifi-cracker-ng".
* Package name: gerix-wifi-cracker-ng
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Emanuele Gentili
* URL : http://backtrack.it/~emgent/
* License
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dojo".
* Package name: dojo
Version : 1.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Alex Russell
* URL : http://dojotoolkit.org
* License : BSD
Section : web
It builds these binary packages:
jslib-dojo - Modular
I'm not a Debian Developer, but I have the impression I was able to
compile perfectly your package without the need to install python-dev...
which indeed is not needed by ordinary _python_ programs, but only by
(C) extensions.
So I think you could remove the unnecessary python-dev from
build-depen
I don't pretend to be a packaging guru, but I have the slight impression
that your package is lintian clean thanks to some bug in lintian:
- version is 1.0.0 ... and it is not a native package. But moreover, it
seems like on the original page (which is
http://backtrack.it/~emgent/hackstuff/Gerix-W
2009/9/2 Pietro Battiston :
> - if I was in you (and though I'm Italian!), I'd make some huge pressure
> on upstream to ask translation of README-DEV and changelog (and, why
> not, the funny project page) in English
It is there:
http://backtrack.it/~emgent/hackstuff/Gerix-Wifi-Cracker-NG/index-en
The source package is named "dojo" and the binary package produced is
named "jslib-dojo". This follows the naming scheme used by the other
jslib packages. However, if the naming policy has changed regarding
these types of packages, I will be more than happy to oblige.
Please let me know, thank you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kartik Mistry wrote:
> 2009/9/2 Pietro Battiston :
>> - if I was in you (and though I'm Italian!), I'd make some huge pressure
>> on upstream to ask translation of README-DEV and changelog (and, why
>> not, the funny project page) in English
>
> It is
Hi,
please name your package
"libjs-dojo"
Regards,
Jérémy Lal.
On 02/09/2009 16:33, Jason Morawski wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dojo".
* Package name: dojo
Version : 1.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Alex Russell
* URL : http://dojotool
You are totally correct, I can't believe I overlooked that. Also, with
regards to the chmod line in rules, I mainly added that to remove the
lintian warning that was produced. Should I instead supply a lintian
override?
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 17:41 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> You just mixed up jslib
Jason Morawski a écrit :
> The source package is named "dojo" and the binary package produced is
> named "jslib-dojo". This follows the naming scheme used by the other
> jslib packages. However, if the naming policy has changed regarding
> these types of packages, I will be more than happy to oblig
You just mixed up jslib and libjs.
There are no package name starting with jslib.
They all start with libjs :
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libjs
On 02/09/2009 17:37, Jason Morawski wrote:
The source package is named "dojo" and the binary package produced is
named "jslib-dojo". This
On 02/09/2009 17:46, Jason Morawski wrote:
You are totally correct, I can't believe I overlooked that. Also, with
regards to the chmod line in rules, I mainly added that to remove the
lintian warning that was produced. Should I instead supply a lintian
override?
the trouble is the place of the
Quoting "Peter Pentchev" :
Hi,
One of my packages, gforth, is having a weird FTBFS on hppa and
a not-so-weird FTBFS on s390.
for hppa assistance you may want to get in touch with these people:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2009/09/msg6.html
gforth was mentioned at the tail of the me
Hello,
This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some debian packages,
and would like to put them onto a personal package repository so that I can
include them in a liveCD I maintain.
Is there somewhere I can create/maintain such a repository without putting
these packages into t
Hello,
As a maintainer of a LiveCD, I have built the cd based on lenny 5.0.2, and want
to stay with that as my base system, however, there are several packages I
would like to be able to pull from sid/squeeze. I realize these are not
"stable" packages, but they are stable enough for my purposes
I demand that gregor herrmann may or may not have written...
[snip]
> In this case "VTE based super lightweight terminal emulator" or maybe
> "lightweight terminal emulator based on VTE" might work.
The latter's fine, IMO, but the former should be "VTE-based...".
[snip]
--
| Darren Salt
Also please note that
/usr/share/javascript
will be accessible on the web server, e.g.
http://localhost/javascript
so in your debian/rules :
chmod +x
debian/jslib-dojo/usr/share/javascript/dojo/dojox/storage/buildFlashStorage.sh
might be a bad place and idea.
Regards.
Jérémy.
On 02/09/2009 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Raikes schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> As a maintainer of a LiveCD, I have built the cd based on lenny 5.0.2, and
> want to stay with that as my base system, however, there are several packages
> I would like to be able to pull from sid/squeeze. I realize
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:19:15 -0700, Don Raikes wrote:
> This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some debian
> packages, and would like to put them onto a personal package
> repository so that I can include them in a liveCD I maintain.
You can create your own repo with mini-dinstal
2009-09-02, gregor herrmann:
> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:19:15 -0700, Don Raikes wrote:
>
> > This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some debian
> > packages, and would like to put them onto a personal package
> > repository so that I can include them in a liveCD I maintain.
>
> Yo
Pietro Battiston wrote:
> I don't pretend to be a packaging guru, but I have the slight impression
> that your package is lintian clean thanks to some bug in lintian:
>
> - version is 1.0.0 ... and it is not a native package. But moreover, it
> seems like on the original page (which is
> http://ba
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Yes. And try to convince upstream to ship the .po files in their
> tarballs.
Clear, thank you all,
Ludovico
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Updated package has been uploaded to mentors.
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 18:03 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 02/09/2009 17:46, Jason Morawski wrote:
> > You are totally correct, I can't believe I overlooked that. Also, with
> > regards to the chmod line in rules, I mainly added that to remove the
> > l
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:19:15AM -0700, Don Raikes wrote:
> This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some
> debian packages, and would like to put them onto a personal
> package repository so that I can include them in a liveCD I
> maintain.
[...]
I do this (assumed apt-ftparchive
Pietro Battiston wrote:
> I'm not a Debian Developer, but I have the impression I was able to
> compile perfectly your package without the need to install python-dev...
> which indeed is not needed by ordinary _python_ programs, but only by
> (C) extensions.
>
> So I think you could remove the unn
Here's some lintian warnings you can take care easily :
W: dojo source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.3)
W: dojo source: patch-system-but-no-source-readme
Means you need to add a debian/README.source explaining why you needed a patch.
Also i understand that mtasc is needed
On Sep 02 2009, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> if i remove python-dev from dependence i have a litian error
> N:The package appears to use Python as part of its build process in
> N:debian/rules but doesn't depend on Python.
Do you need python or python-dev? Perhaps just python would work,
depend
2009/9/1 George Danchev :
> This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks.
Thank you! Would you upload poco-doc too?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco-doc/poco-doc_1.3.5-1.dsc
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt
http://www.burghardt.pl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.1+dfsg1-3
of my package "anubis".
It builds these binary packages:
anubis - an SMTP message submission daemon
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix FTBFS on ia64 [1].
The package can be found on mentor
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-keyring".
* Package name: python-keyring
Version : 0.1+hg66-1
Upstream Author : Kang Zhang
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/keyring
* License : PSF (Python Software Foundation license)
Sectio
Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Sep 02 2009, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
>> if i remove python-dev from dependence i have a litian error
>> N:The package appears to use Python as part of its build process in
>> N:debian/rules but doesn't depend on Python.
>
> Do you need python or python-dev? Perhaps
Hi
Dne Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:56:21 +0200
Carl Chenet napsal(a):
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-keyring".
>
> * Package name: python-keyring
> Version : 0.1+hg66-1
Is it really necessary to package some vcs snapshot?
Otherwise the package loo
Sorry to bother, but :
find . -name *.php
./dojox/analytics/logger/dojoxAnalytics.php
./dojox/analytics/logger/JSON.php
./dojox/form/resources/RecieveFile.php
./dojox/form/resources/cLOG.php
./dojox/form/resources/UploadFile.php
./dojox/resources/explore.php
./dojox/grid/compat/tests/support/da
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jfauth".
* Package name: jfauth
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Avery Pennarun
* URL : http://github.com/apenwarr/jfauth
* License : GPLv2
Section : net (better suggestions?)
It builds these
Le jeudi 03 septembre 2009 à 00:02 +0200, Michal Čihař a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Dne Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:56:21 +0200
> Carl Chenet napsal(a):
>
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-keyring".
> >
> > * Package name: python-keyring
> > Version : 0.1+
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2-2.1 of
the package "nd". It builds these binary packages:
nd --- Tiny little command line WebDAV interface
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix this bug: 408084
The package can be found on mentor
I think that some of these files should go
in /usr/share/doc/libjs-dojo-dojox/examples and others should be
excluded from the package.
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 23:50 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Sorry to bother, but :
>
> > find . -name *.php
> ./dojox/analytics/logger/dojoxAnalytics.php
> ./dojox/ana
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gregor herrmann wrote:
> In this case "VTE based super lightweight terminal emulator" or maybe
> "lightweight terminal emulator based on VTE" might work.
Rogério Brito wrote:
> Now, the point with the problem: it is not, from a user's perspective,
> c
46 matches
Mail list logo
