On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Theppitak
Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Nicolas Spalinger
> wrote:
>> LI Daobing wrote:
>>> yes, i know it is not DFSG-free.
>>>
>>> but not all the non-DFSG-free software can be uploaded to non-free,
>>> and I can't found any conclusion
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:2.6.30.1
of my package "kernel-patch-exec-shield".
It builds these binary packages:
kernel-patch-exec-shield - protection against stack smashing and other attacks
(dummy package)
linux-patch-exec-shield - protection against stack sma
> Frank Küster writes:
> > Maybe some other tool "usually" also creates DEBIAN, but not in my case?
>
> I'm really confused by this too, since the calling sequence for a binary
> build also runs dh_makeshlibs before running dh_installdeb,
> dh_makeshlibs seems to assume that the DEBIAN directory a
Hi,
Jérémy Lal writes:
> i wish to update the package spawn-fcgi to correct a bug.
> but i can't upload it to debian mentors : it's been removed
> from my package list (probably because it's now in the debian
> archive) and mentors refuses packages not starting with -1 version.
>
> my question i
George Danchev writes:
> dh sequencer also calls dh_installdebconf earlier in the call sequence
> (which Frank's rules was actually missing), which takes care to create
> debian/pkg/DEBIAN/ directory. So, when dh_makeshlibs and dh_shlibdeps
> enter the scene, we have valid package directories, as
Hi,
i wish to update the package spawn-fcgi to correct a bug.
but i can't upload it to debian mentors : it's been removed
from my package list (probably because it's now in the debian
archive) and mentors refuses packages not starting with -1 version.
my question is : where to dupload it so that
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:55:51 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Hi,
> i wish to update the package spawn-fcgi to correct a bug.
> but i can't upload it to debian mentors : it's been removed
> from my package list (probably because it's now in the debian
> archive) and mentors refuses packages not starting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johan Henriksson wrote:
> octave:3> bin2dec("0")
> ans = 15
>
> this functionality, and much more, is already covered by the octave package
Yes, this is true octave offers many features, however, a developer
needs a fast tool and tinycalc is good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
LordZen wrote:
> Johan Henriksson wrote:
>> octave:3> bin2dec("0") ans = 15
>
>> this functionality, and much more, is already covered by the
> octave package Yes, this is true octave offers many features,
> however, a developer needs a fast tool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ah".
* Package name: ah
Version : 0.02-1
Upstream Author : Zhaolei
Maintainer : Harry Rickards
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/antihex/
* License
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 19:39, Harry Rickards wrote:
> The package appears to be lintian clean apart from a few warnings that I
> can't seem to correct (http://pastebin.com/f2ed86daf)
please explain WHY you can't correct them. for example:
W: ah: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/ah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/09 18:56, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 19:39, Harry Rickards wrote:
>> The package appears to be lintian clean apart from a few warnings that I
>> can't seem to correct (http://pastebin.com/f2ed86daf)
>
> please explain WHY yo
> George Danchev writes:
> > dh sequencer also calls dh_installdebconf earlier in the call sequence
> > (which Frank's rules was actually missing), which takes care to create
> > debian/pkg/DEBIAN/ directory. So, when dh_makeshlibs and dh_shlibdeps
> > enter the scene, we have valid package direct
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Harry Rickards wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/22/09 18:56, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 19:39, Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> The package appears to be lintian clean apart from a few warnings that I
>>> can't seem to c
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:39:25 +0100
Harry Rickards wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ah".
Can't this use a better name, like antihex ?
At least that tells me something about what the package can do. Or
maybe something like hex2dec or similar.
How does this c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/09 19:45, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:39:25 +0100
> Harry Rickards wrote:
>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ah".
>
> Can't this use a better name, like antihex ?
>
> At least that tells m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/09 19:39, Alexander Toresson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Harry Rickards wrote:
...
> Thanks for the advice. I've managed to get rid of all of the errors
> apart from two. They are:
>
> new-package-should-close-itp-bug
> and
> ma
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iulib".
* Package name: iulib
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/iulib/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : graphics
It builds these binary packages:
lib
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:41:07 +0100
Harry Rickards wrote:
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ah".
> >
> > Can't this use a better name, like antihex ?
> >
> > At least that tells me something about what the package can do. Or
> > maybe something like hex2dec or similar.
> >
> > How
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:19:07 +0100
Neil Williams wrote:
> Make sure you document this change in the ITP - including retitling the
> ITP to use the changed package name.
Just saw, you've already done that. #534242 - thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://ww
On 22 Jun 2009, at 21:20, Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:19:07 +0100
Neil Williams wrote:
Make sure you document this change in the ITP - including retitling
the
ITP to use the changed package name.
Just saw, you've already done that. #534242 - thanks.
Actually, that was t
Chrysostomos,
Well, I've already sent one ITA, but a I dont know how we can work for
mpg321.
I sent e-mails to Joe Drew and , eff and Stephen Depooter but I don't have
any answer.
Will you be the new upstream author?
Some mentor know how we can continue with this?
Regards,
Elías
On Sun, Jun 21,
Dear Mentors,
Can someone please upload this package for me?
I have recently added a sponsorship entry for it here:
http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=480
1. Name:
kabikaboo
2. License:
GPL
3. Short Description:
Recursive Writing Assistant
3. Long Description:
Kabikaboo is a simple tr
Harry Rickards writes:
> Even after removing the \, I still get:
>
> W: ah: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/ah.1.gz
ah.1.gz in the deb archive that you pointed to at the beginning of this
thread is a pure text file that's just formatted vaguely like the output
of nroff. The man
"Master Kernel" wrote in message
news:4a3cf0a0.1040...@gmail.com...
Theoretically speaking, what if I found someone within the Debian
community with a trusted identity who could package the program from
source for me, and then upload it. Could I then remain anonymous as the
upstream author?
Hi,
as suggested on debian-user I repost my question here (sorry for the
cross post, but I think it's better than send to individual emails to
both lists, feel free to remove the other list)
I'm currently packaging some "internal" software named gds with the
great CDBS package. However, I have a
On 23 Jun 2009, at 00:27, Russ Allbery wrote:
Harry Rickards writes:
Even after removing the \, I still get:
W: ah: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/ah.1.gz
ah.1.gz in the deb archive that you pointed to at the beginning of
this
thread is a pure text file that's just form
On 23 Jun 2009, at 00:27, Russ Allbery wrote:
Harry Rickards writes:
Even after removing the \, I still get:
W: ah: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/ah.1.gz
ah.1.gz in the deb archive that you pointed to at the beginning of
this
thread is a pure text file that's just form
28 matches
Mail list logo
