Dear mentors,
A month ago I sent the following RFS without anyone offering to sponsor it.
I'm resending it as a reminder.
I am looking for guidance and a sponsor for my package "fsprotect".
* Package name: fsprotect
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Stefanos Harhalakis (me)
* U
Hello,
2009/4/21 Stefanos Harhalakis :
> Dear mentors,
>
> A month ago I sent the following RFS without anyone offering to sponsor it.
> I'm resending it as a reminder.
>
> I am looking for guidance and a sponsor for my package "fsprotect".
>
> * Package name : fsprotect
> Version : 1.
> Od: Free Ekanayaka
> JM> I would like to do it, but having problem to log in.
>
> JM> Should I create new account or try pkg-ml email + passwd?
>
> I think you have to create a new account:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging?action=newaccount
Hi there,
Problem
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Problem creating account:
...
> Having error:
> global name 'name' is not defined
Woops, my fault (typo). Should be fixed now.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debia
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:18, John Stamp wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcometen4".
>
> * Package name : kcometen4
> Version : 1.0.4-1
> Upstream Author : John Stamp
> * URL : http://www.mehercule.net/staticpages/index.php/k
Hello,
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, LI Daobing wrote:
> 2009/4/21 Stefanos Harhalakis :
> > I am looking for guidance and a sponsor for my package "fsprotect".
> 1. why this package is a native package? i think a normal package
> should be better
It was also mentioned on the last thread so I omit th
2009/4/21 Stefanos Harhalakis :
> fsprotect needs a directory under the root filesystem to preexist. Most
> probably it won't be used by normal users, so this won't be common. In IRC it
> was mentioned that it could should use /lib/fsprotect, but this directory is
> already used to store a helper
[not sure if debian-mentors is the right list, but I try anyway]
Hi,
I maintain the lksctp-tools package, which builds the libsctp1 binary package.
The package so fare has been fairly straight forward and for version 1.0.9 I
used a symbols file for libsctp1 which looks like this:
libsctp.so.1 li
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> 2009/4/21 Stefanos Harhalakis :
> > fsprotect needs a directory under the root filesystem to preexist. Most
> > probably it won't be used by normal users, so this won't be common. In
> > IRC it was mentioned that it could should use /lib/fsprotect, but t
Excerpts from Stefanos Harhalakis's message of mar abr 21 12:12:02 -0300 2009:
> > > I am looking for guidance and a sponsor for my package "fsprotect".
> > 1. why this package is a native package? i think a normal package
> > should be better
> It was also mentioned on the last thread so I omit
Hi,
I'm searching for some "standard" templates for README.source about:
- DFSG changes
- Quilt usage (reference to /usr/share/doc/quilt/README.source ?)
- Other files removed from the original tarball for various reasons
Were can I find those informations (wiki...) ?
Thank you,
--
Laurent Léon
Hi,
Is there a naming recommendation for patches when using quilt in a Debian
package ?
patch-name.diff ?
patch-name.patch ?
0X-patch-name.diff ?
0X-patch-name.patch ?
000X-patch-name.diff ?
000X-patch-name.patch ?
an other ?
The quilt man page uses "patch-name.diff" in the examples, but I see
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:45:39 +0200, Laurent Léonard wrote:
> I'm searching for some "standard" templates for README.source about:
> - DFSG changes
> - Quilt usage (reference to /usr/share/doc/quilt/README.source ?)
> - Other files removed from the original tarball for various reasons
For packages
2009/4/22 Laurent Léonard :
> Is there a naming recommendation for patches when using quilt in a Debian
> package ?
>
> patch-name.diff ?
I don't use this because of the extension.
> patch-name.patch ?
I personally prefer this.
> 0X-patch-name.diff ?
> 0X-patch-name.patch ?
> 000X-patch-name.d
Hello,
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Excerpts from Stefanos Harhalakis's message of mar abr 21 12:12:02 -0300
2009:
> > fsprotect is 100% tied to a distribution. It cannot be an independent
>
> Anyway, it shouldn't be a native package, native packages need a new
> release t
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:21:18 -0300
Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> > It was also mentioned on the last thread so I omit that:
>
> > fsprotect is 100% tied to a distribution. It cannot be an independent
> > program
> > that is packaged for debian or other distributions. The core functionality
> >
Dear all
Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
changelogs?
(Asking because of the explicit statement of one type of changlelog
and new upgrade to must)
Eg.
foobar (1.5.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Joe Plow Mber ]
* New upstream release
[ Vasja Pupkin ]
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> [not sure if debian-mentors is the right list, but I try anyway]
>
> Hi,
>
> I maintain the lksctp-tools package, which builds the libsctp1 binary package.
> The package so fare has been fairly straight forward and for version 1.0.9 I
> used
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:06:23 +0100
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
> changelogs?
Yes.
> (Asking because of the explicit statement of one type of changlelog
> and new upgrade to must)
The important lines are:
> fooba
Neil Williams a écrit :
>> Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
>> changelogs?
>
> Yes.
And what was the prevous style of changelog allowed, by the way?
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
I'm uploading rhino and tomcat-native now
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear Mentors,
While looking at http://lintian.debian.org/tags/gz-file-not-gzip.html
I noticed this lintian warning about my package ampache.
W gz-file-not-gzip
"The given file ends with .gz, which normally indicates it is compressed
with gzip. However, it doesn't seem to be a gzip-compressed f
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:54:12PM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> W gz-file-not-gzip
>
> The file that lintian is complaining about is
>
> usr/share/ampache/www/modules/getid3/module.archive.gzip.php
>
> As you can see the file clearly does not end with .gz but instead it
> ends in php. Thi
Laurent Léonard writes:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a naming recommendation for patches when using quilt in a Debian
> package ?
[…]
> 0X-patch-name.patch ?
> 000X-patch-name.patch ?
I use names similar to these.
01.foo-bar-baz.patch
02.spim-spam-spom.patch
The full-stop ‘.’ makes a slightly
Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
> Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
> changelogs?
> (Asking because of the explicit statement of one type of changlelog
> and new upgrade to must)
That type of changelog allows anything at all following the two space
indent for entries
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:22:49PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Neil Williams a écrit :
> >> Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
> >> changelogs?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> And what was the prevous style of changelog allowed, by the way?
Originally, the debian changelo
Charlie Smotherman writes:
> The file that lintian is complaining about is
>
> usr/share/ampache/www/modules/getid3/module.archive.gzip.php
>
> As you can see the file clearly does not end with .gz but instead it
> ends in php. This file is not compressed with gzip but instead adds
> gzip functi
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 17:02 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Charlie Smotherman writes:
>
> > The file that lintian is complaining about is
> >
> > usr/share/ampache/www/modules/getid3/module.archive.gzip.php
> >
> > As you can see the file clearly does not end with .gz but instead it
> > ends in php
Excerpts from Neil Williams's message of mar abr 21 14:53:13 -0300 2009:
> On what basis? apt and dpkg are definitely native packages, as are most
> other packages that use apt and dpkg directly (like emdebian-*).
> Packages that use .deb files in explicit manners are often native too -
> unless th
Hi Deepak,
I went over the currently open buglist to see if I could contribute by
fixing some of them to start with. One of the questions I had is some
bugs are platform specific / hardware specific.
For eg:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 61s! (AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core)
To reproduce the pr
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:22, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Hi Rogério,
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:32:46PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>> Probably this was missed the past few times that I posted to the list.
>>
>> Please, could anybody sponsor it?
>
> I've started looking at this package, but got
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:04:00 -0700
Ramesh wrote:
> I went over the currently open buglist to see if I could contribute by
> fixing some of them to start with. One of the questions I had is some
> bugs are platform specific / hardware specific.
>
> For eg:
>
> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:06:23 -0300
Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Excerpts from Neil Williams's message of mar abr 21 14:53:13 -0300 2009:
> > On what basis? apt and dpkg are definitely native packages, as are most
> > other packages that use apt and dpkg directly (like emdebian-*).
> > Packages that
33 matches
Mail list logo
