_i368

2009-03-17 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello, I just build package and this having suffix i386 even I set debian/control Architecture: any and in debian/rules I put all dh_scripts to "binary-indep" section. Did I forgot something to do? Thanks for help cheers mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.o

Re: _i368

2009-03-17 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 08:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hello, > > I just build package and this having suffix i386 even I set debian/control > Architecture: any > and in debian/rules I put all dh_scripts to "binary-indep" section. > Did I forgot something to do? and arch:any package is build on e

Re: _i368

2009-03-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 08:02:20AM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > I just build package and this having suffix i386 even I set debian/control > Architecture: any > and in debian/rules I put all dh_scripts to "binary-indep" section. If the package is "architecture independent", then Architecture

Re: _i368

2009-03-17 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Salvatore Bonaccorso > If the package is "architecture independent", then Architecture should > be "all", not "any". See debian-policy 5.6.8 Archtiecture [1] for > reference. > > [1] > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture > > Does this helps you?

Re: _i368

2009-03-17 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Sandro Tosi > > And I'm pretty sure there is some doc about things like this ;) Thanks ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

how to support 32- & 64-bit versions of libraries

2009-03-17 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, For package "gmp", I have two open requests to provide 64-bit versions of the libraries on ppc. One of the requests also asks for a 32-bit version on amd64. What is the best way to do this? Is this related to "biarch" or "multiarch"? I can not find any information on the former, while th

Re: Best way to compile packages for multiple architecture?

2009-03-17 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Hi again 2009/3/15 Jean-Yves Avenard : >> sorry, if you're using pbuilder you will need to build with >> "--debbuildopts -B". Hum... I spoke too quickly ... And it seems to be an issue with pdebuild. So I have created a package for nvidia 180.37 drivers. First, compile (with source) AMD64 ve

Re: RFS: lbzip2

2009-03-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:55 AM, ERSEK Laszlo wrote: > Oops. The nocheck build option needed a change. I apologize for rushing it. > I uploaded the package to > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbzip2 Uploaded. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: how to support 32- & 64-bit versions of libraries

2009-03-17 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Steve, On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:11:00AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > For package "gmp", I have two open requests to provide 64-bit versions > of the libraries on ppc. One of the requests also asks for a 32-bit > version on amd64. I'd like to see 32bit libs for amd64, too. :-) > Is this

Re: quilt[Solved]... bug?

2009-03-17 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 07:27 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > Původní zpráva > > Od: Jaromír Mikeš > > > Described in different way: > > > > m...@64studio:~/jnoise/jnoise-0.4.0$ quilt new makefile.patch > > Patch makefile.patch is now on top > > m...@64studio:~/jnoise/jno

RFS: jbig2enc

2009-03-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jbig2enc". * Package name: jbig2enc Version : 0.27-1 Upstream Author : Adam Langley * URL : http://www.imperialviolet.org/jbig2.html * License : Apache License, Version 2.0 Section : graphics

Need advices library packaging.

2009-03-17 Thread Anthony Gasperin
Hi everybody, I'm intended to package axis2c api, which is a set of api for implement soap service/client. My problem is that I do not know how to process with library packaging, I am wondering if somebody would know where I could find relative documentation. Thanks a lot !

Re: Need advices library packaging.

2009-03-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Anthony Gasperin wrote: > My problem is that I do not know how to process with library packaging, > I am wondering if somebody would know where I could find relative > documentation. http://packages.debian.org/libpkg-guide http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column

Re: Need advices library packaging.

2009-03-17 Thread S'orlok Reaves
Hello, Assuming that you have double-checked that you are reading to package axis2c, the new maintainer's guide is a very good place to begin: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ If you prefer a guided example, I found this article helpful: http://www.debian-administration.org/article

RFS: kpicosim (updated package)

2009-03-17 Thread Adrian Knoth
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7 of my package "kpicosim". It builds these binary packages: kpicosim - IDE and simulator for the Xilinx PicoBlaze-3 The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 482937 The package can be found on men

Re: Need advices library packaging.

2009-03-17 Thread Anthony Gasperin
Hello, Thanks for answering, I read debian maintainer's guide but packaging axis2c seems to be different than package a simple ( or multiple ) binary file, axis2c is about library. Moroever should I separate the axis2c soap server and the library ? meanning create two different package ... Is the

Re: Best way to compile packages for multiple architecture?

2009-03-17 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi, On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:13:35PM +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > > So it is creating a .tar.gz file ; and it looks like pdebuild isn't > aware that the source code isn't to be copied in the result directory > at the end. > pdebuild first builds a source-only build in your current direct

Re: quilt[Solved]... bug?

2009-03-17 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Chow Loong Jin > I'm not sure, maybe quilt doesn't support full paths? Either way you can > always use tab completion. Type the first few characters and then press > tab and it'll be completed for you. I think that's possibly faster than > drag-dropping especially when the stuff is in the s

Building library

2009-03-17 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello, I just building library from source and there more files in debian/ than for building program. Not all are described in "New Maintainer's Guide" can I get somewhere more info about building libs. Is there something I should be aware before start. Thanks for advice mira -- To UNSUBSC

Re: Building library

2009-03-17 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Jaromír Mikeš > I just building library from source and there more files in debian/ than for > building program. > Not all are described in "New Maintainer's Guide" can I get somewhere more > info > about building libs. > Is there something I should be aware before start. Sorry I didn't

RFS: nautilus-share (updated package + bugfixes)

2009-03-17 Thread Chow Loong Jin
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.2-1 of my package "nautilus-share". It builds these binary packages: nautilus-share - Nautilus extension to share folder using Samba The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 475230, 500443, 501938

RFS: g3dviewer

2009-03-17 Thread Sven Eckelmann
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "g3dviewer". * Package name: g3dviewer Version : 0.2.99.5~svn113-1 Upstream Author : Markus Dahms * URL : http://automagically.de/g3dviewer/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : graphics It builds thes

RFS: flvtool++

2009-03-17 Thread Vincent MAUGE
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flvtool++". It is my first package so any comment will be really appreciate. * Package name : flvtool++ Version : 1.1.7-1 Upstream Author : Dan Weatherford and Facebook, inc. * URL : http://mirror.facebook.com/facebook/flvtool++/ * License

substvar-source-version-is-deprecated

2009-03-17 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello, having this warning message from lintian. Even I was qooqling a lot I didn't found clear answer how to repair it. Thanks a lot mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: substvar-source-version-is-deprecated

2009-03-17 Thread Russ Allbery
Jaromír Mikeš writes: > having this warning message from lintian. > Even I was qooqling a lot I didn't found clear answer how to repair it. lintian -i says: The package uses the now deprecated ${Source-Version} substvar, which has misleading semantics. Please switch to ${binary:Version} or

Re: substvar-source-version-is-deprecated

2009-03-17 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:15:33AM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hello, > > having this warning message from lintian. > Even I was qooqling a lot I didn't found clear answer how to repair it. Two ways. First, run lintian with the -i option to display information on the errors, warnings etc. being

Re: substvar-source-version-is-deprecated

2009-03-17 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Russ Allbery > > The package uses the now deprecated ${Source-Version} substvar, which has > misleading semantics. Please switch to ${binary:Version} or > ${source:Version} as appropriate (introduced in dpkg 1.13.19, released > with etch). Support for ${Source-Version} may be removed

RFS: fookebox

2009-03-17 Thread Stefan Ott
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fookebox", a web-based mpd frontend. * Package name: fookebox Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Ott * URL : http://fookebox.googlecode.com/ * License : GNU GPL Section : web It builds

Re: RFS: fookebox

2009-03-17 Thread Mauro Lizaur
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Stefan Ott wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fookebox", a web-based mpd > frontend. > > * Package name: fookebox > Version : 0.2.0-1 > Upstream Author : Stefan Ott > * URL : http://fookebox.googlecode.com/ > *

Re: RFS: flvtool++

2009-03-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Vincent MAUGE wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flvtool++". > It is my first package so any comment will be really appreciate. We already have flvtool2 in the archive, please compare and contrast the two. It might be a good idea for both upstre

Re: RFS: fookebox

2009-03-17 Thread Ben Finney
Mauro Lizaur writes: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Stefan Ott wrote: > > > It builds these binary packages: > > fookebox - A jukebox frontend to mpd > > I'm not a DD, but I'd recommend you to do a small change the small > description, just by adding the words 'web based'. I think that > would be mor