Re: RFS: cfi (adopted package, 2nd try)

2008-09-25 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:32:28 +0200 "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0-8 > of package "cfi". I have adopted this package. > > It builds these binary packages: > cfi-en - Copyright does not exist, book about hacker cult

Re: apt-proxy, apt-cacher & approx

2008-09-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite > buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems > with apt-cacher as well (like currently, a recurring tzdata size They will go away if you unlink the .deb file in /var/ca

RFS: gnujump (updated package/new upstream release)

2008-09-25 Thread Evgeni Golov
Dear mentors, dear pkg-games, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.6-1 of Bas Wijnen's package "gnujump" (he agreed I should upload it, as he has currently no time for it). It builds these binary packages: gnujump- platform game where you have to jump up to survive gnujump-data

Re: CDBS duplicate docs installation

2008-09-25 Thread William Vera
Hello 2008/9/17 Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080917 03:57]: >> 2008/9/16 Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > it is probably that debhelper installs the docs (README AUTHORS >> > ChangeLog TODO) in /usr/share/docs/foo and the makefile in /usr/doc/

Re: RFS: scim-waitzar

2008-09-25 Thread S'orlok Reaves
Good afternoon, everyone, I've uploaded my package to mentors.debian.net; it passes lintian and generates no additional warnings. I've also refactored the package so that it is no longer a Debian native package; the orig/diff/dsc can now be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/mai

No response from MIA

2008-09-25 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi, I am trying to get the maintainership for a package (SCID, et al). Therefore I first in may contacted the original maintainer. But he didnt reply. And also after a second mail in june I got no response. After that I contacted QA ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), first in august second time in september. S

Re: RFS: scim-waitzar

2008-09-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:14 PM, S'orlok Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/ Some comments: debian/rules contains lots of commented out stuff and other unnessecary parts. debian/docs shouldn't distribute the NEWS file until it contains

Re: RFS: scim-waitzar

2008-09-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > please read the best practicies for package descriptions Here are the URLs for that: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-control http://web.archive.org/web/20070915131707/http