Re: Anonymous delayed queue?

2008-02-14 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11295 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote: > Is there a possibility to make delayed uploads as a DM ? No. -- bye, Joerg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Windows ME? Mit 13? Kann der nicht lieber Drogen nehmen wie andere Kinder in dem Alter? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: RFS: caudium (updated package)

2008-02-14 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2008 11:17:44 schrieb Henrik Andreasson: > Hilights from the changelog: >* New maintainer (Closes: #411675) >* Repacked caudium as architecture "all", thus caudium now uses > /usr/share/caudium as serverdir instead of > /usr/lib/caudium (Closes: #21) >

How uploaded zerofree?

2008-02-14 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, someone was so kind as to upload one of my packages, zerofree (now in NEW). I'd like to be sure who that was, so I can contact them later for the next upload for instance. How can I find out? Best regards, Thibaut. PGP.sig Description: Ceci est une signature électronique PGP

Re: How uploaded zerofree?

2008-02-14 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > someone was so kind as to upload one of my packages, zerofree (now in > NEW). I'd like to be sure who that was, so I can contact them later for > the next upload for instance. How can I find out? Usually, "who-uploads" from "devscripts" shou

Re: How uploaded zerofree?

2008-02-14 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:56:49AM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Hi, > > someone was so kind as to upload one of my packages, zerofree (now in > NEW). I'd like to be sure who that was, so I can contact them later for > the next upload for instance. How can I find out? It was Christoph Haas. Y

Re: How uploaded zerofree?

2008-02-14 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2008 12:12:23 schrieb Kumar Appaiah: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:56:49AM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > someone was so kind as to upload one of my packages, zerofree (now in > > NEW). I'd like to be sure who that was, so I can contact them later > > for th

Re: RFS: failmalloc

2008-02-14 Thread Jon Dowland
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:32:18PM +0900, Michal ??iha?? wrote: > No you should not change orig.tar.gz, it should be exactly the same as > upstream provides (unless you have good reason to do so). Just delete > them in clean under same condition you use for copying them > from /usr/share, this way

Re: How uploaded zerofree?

2008-02-14 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:08:11PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > > > someone was so kind as to upload one of my packages, zerofree (now in > > > NEW). I'd like to be sure who that was, so I can contact them later > > > for the next upload for instance. How can I find out? > > > > It was Christop

Re: RFS: failmalloc

2008-02-14 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080214 12:20]: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:32:18PM +0900, Michal ??iha?? wrote: > > No you should not change orig.tar.gz, it should be exactly the same as > > upstream provides (unless you have good reason to do so). Just delete > > them in clean under same condi

RFS: asterisk-prompt-es (updated package)

2008-02-14 Thread Victor Seva
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-2 of my package "asterisk-prompt-es". It builds these binary packages: asterisk-prompt-es - Spanish prompts for the Asterisk PBX The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http:

Re: RFS: asterisk-prompt-es (updated package)

2008-02-14 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Hi, Victor Seva wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-2 of my package "asterisk-prompt-es". Is there any reason why this isn't maintained in pkg-voip's SVN repository? Regards, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: RFS: asterisk-prompt-es (updated package)

2008-02-14 Thread Victor Seva
Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Is there any reason why this isn't maintained in pkg-voip's SVN repository? No, there isn't. If you think it has to be on svn and I could commit on it, I have no objection. -- - | ,''`.

Re: RFS: failmalloc

2008-02-14 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:31:16PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > Again: there is no need to save the old config.guess and config.sub. > Just delete them in clean and copy them in before configuring, all > problems solved. Because: > the unpacked source is back to pristine upstream after the ma

Re: RFS: python-twitter

2008-02-14 Thread Mauro Lizaur
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Piotr Ożarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Added the email of the author and Google as a copyright holder too. > > I hope this is ok, if not, just tell me. > > I cannot find anything about DeWitt Clinton being a copyright holder, > please point me to proper

Re: Anonymous delayed queue?

2008-02-14 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Cyril, * Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-14 08:48]: > On 14/02/2008, Charles Plessy wrote: > > If you or somebody else agree that it is of general interest (in > > private if you want to limit the traffic on this list), I can > > propose an update for the Developpers Reference. > >

RFS: gfxboot

2008-02-14 Thread David Paleino
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for "gfxboot". * Package name: gfxboot Version : 4.0.1-1 Upstream Author : SUSE LINUX AG, Nuernberg, Germany Steffen Winterfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.novell.com/products/linuxpackages/suseli

Re: RFS: lynis

2008-02-14 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
Hi Francisco, IANADD so I cannot sponsor your upload. However I think my comments may be useful for you. CC'ing my AM: Eventually he has additional comments and/or is willing to sponsor your upload, when everything okay. On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:22:42AM +0100, Francisco García wrote: > - dget h

Re: Bug#397939: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

2008-02-14 Thread Clint Adams
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:53:48AM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote: > I suggest to mandate "remove all generated files in the clean target" > (formulated in a way which includes "generated by upstream", not only > "generated by the build target), which implies "rebuild everything in > the build target". T

Done. Re: RFS: meritous 1.2-2 (now 1.2+dfsg-1)

2008-02-14 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* D. Moonfire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080213 18:28]: > Ended up repackaging parts of the package when I went through a > licensing audit on the music files. After suggestions from > #debian-games, I removed the music files and changed it to get version > 1.2+dfsg-1. Uploaded. Yours sincerely, Ale

Re: Bug#397939: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

2008-02-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A workaround could be to not regenerate the files. This is how it is > usually done now. IMO that is incorrect, because the compiler for every > generated file must be in Debian. The current practise of not rerunning > autotools makes this rule technical

Re: Bug#397939: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

2008-02-14 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:43:52PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:53:48AM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > I suggest to mandate "remove all generated files in the clean target" > > (formulated in a way which includes "generated by upstream", not only > > "generated by the build

Re: Bug#397939: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

2008-02-14 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:02:41PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > A workaround could be to not regenerate the files. This is how it is > > usually done now. IMO that is incorrect, because the compiler for every > > generated file must be in Debian. The cu

Re: Bug#397939: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

2008-02-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:02:41PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Note that libtool is an unusual case here and isn't the same as >> Autoconf or Automake. The files included in the package (libtool.m4 >> and ltmain.sh) are not generated files in the same se

Re: Bug#397939: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

2008-02-14 Thread Clint Adams
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:02:41PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Note that libtool is an unusual case here and isn't the same as Autoconf > or Automake. The files included in the package (libtool.m4 and ltmain.sh) > are not generated files in the same sense. Running libtoolize basically > just cop

Re: Bug#397939: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

2008-02-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:02:41PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Note that libtool is an unusual case here and isn't the same as >> Autoconf or Automake. The files included in the package (libtool.m4 >> and ltmain.sh) are not generated files in the same s

RFS: gnome-schedule (updated package)

2008-02-14 Thread Pedro Fragoso
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.2-1.1 of my package "gnome-schedule". It builds these binary packages: gnome-schedule - GNOME scheduler for automatic tasks The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 452458 The package can be found

Re: RFS: python-twitter

2008-02-14 Thread Mauro Lizaur
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Piotr Ożarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Mauro Lizaur, 13.02.2008] > > > On Feb 12, 2008 9:28 PM, Piotr Ożarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One more thing before I upload it: please clarify copyright holder > > > issue - the one in sources and in debia

Re: RFS: lynis

2008-02-14 Thread Paul Wise
First, a question: How does lynis compare with bastille (already in Debian)? On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IANADD so I cannot sponsor your upload. However I think my comments may > be useful for you. CC'ing my AM: Eventually he has additional

Re: RFS: syslog-summary (updated and adopted package)

2008-02-14 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.13 of the package > "syslog-summary", which I'm also adopting (ITA: #455005). Looks like a worthwhile package to keep going. > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - dget > http://me

Re: RFS: syslog-summary (updated and adopted package)

2008-02-14 Thread David Paleino
Il giorno Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:58:34 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hello, Hi Kapil, > On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote: > > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - dget > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/syslog-summary/syslog-su