Re: Tests that take more than ten times build time.

2008-02-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wed, February 13, 2008 07:24, Charles Plessy wrote: > Test time on arch (build time) > 1h05 on sparc (3 min), > 37 min on mipsel (2 min), > 39 min on mips (3 min), > 37 min on powerpc (2 min), > 19 min on hppa (2 min), > 6 min on amd64 (1 min)… > > > Of course, if this is an exception, there i

Re: Tests that take more than ten times build time.

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Plessy
Hi Thijis, Le Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:11:41AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : > > we have enough build time available Well, the following package of mine are waiting for the mips buildds for testing transition (position in the queue in parenthesis): treeviewx (165) njplot (156) emboss (152) A

Re: Tests that take more than ten times build time.

2008-02-13 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 13 févr. 08 à 11:34, Charles Plessy a écrit : Hi Thijis, Le Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:11:41AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : we have enough build time available Well, the following package of mine are waiting for the mips buildds for testing transition (position in the queue in paren

Re: Tests that take more than ten times build time.

2008-02-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Feb 13, 2008 7:58 PM, Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how can you find out the position in the queue? Here for one: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=yorick -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Tests that take more than ten times build time.

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:58:14AM +0100, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > > how can you find out the position in the queue? In one of the non-official buildd pages: http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=yorick This page is linked from the PTS: http://packages.qa.debian.org/y/yorick.htm

Re: Tests that take more than ten times build time.

2008-02-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wed, February 13, 2008 11:34, Charles Plessy wrote: > And another one, who was never built in mips, is number 509 in the queue > (glam2). > > For njplot, the waiting time is already 29 days. Therefore, I am a bit > doubtful that we have enough build power. Would we have, my original > question w

Re: Tests that take more than ten times build time.

2008-02-13 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:58:14AM +0100, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : how can you find out the position in the queue? Le 13 févr. 08 à 12:06, Charles Plessy a écrit : In one of the non-official buildd pages: http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=yorick This page is linked fr

RFS: QA Upload -- kguitar - Stringed instrument tablature editor for KDE

2008-02-13 Thread Barry deFreese
Hi, Here is a QA upload for kguitar. Fixes 2 bugs and standards update, etc. if someone has time to review/upload. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kguitar/kguitar_0.5-3.dsc Description: Stringed instrument tablature editor for KDE Kguitar is basically a guitar tablature editor

RFS: docbook2X (0.8.8-6), docbook-defguide (2.0.17+svn7549-2), xmlto (0.0.20-1)

2008-02-13 Thread Daniel Leidert
Hi, Unfortunately my usual sponsor is busy atm and I have some packages waiting to be uploaded. So I'm looking for one-time sponsor(s) for the following packages: http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/debian-xml-sgml/docbook-defguide_2.0.17+svn7549-2.dsc http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/inco

RFS: QA Upload -- ksimus-boolean

2008-02-13 Thread Barry deFreese
Hi, Here is a QA upload to fix the FTBFS and some other clean-up as usual. I probably broke this by uploading ksimus without libqt3-compat-headers anyway. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/ksimus-boolean/ksimus-boolean_0.3.6-13.dsc Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: RFS: meritous 1.2-2 (now 1.2+dfsg-1)

2008-02-13 Thread D. Moonfire
Ended up repackaging parts of the package when I went through a licensing audit on the music files. After suggestions from #debian-games, I removed the music files and changed it to get version 1.2+dfsg-1. + Removed music files due to licensing issues. Patched code to make music files op

RFS: QA Upload -- ksimus-datarecorder

2008-02-13 Thread Barry deFreese
Hi, Here is a QA upload to fix the FTBFS and some other clean-up as usual. I probably broke this by uploading ksimus without libqt3-compat-headers anyway. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/ksimus-datarecorder/ksimus-datarecorder_0.3.6-13.dsc Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIB

RFS: QA Upload -- ksimus-floatingpoint

2008-02-13 Thread Barry deFreese
Hi, Here is a QA upload to fix the FTBFS and some other clean-up as usual. I probably broke this one also by uploading ksimus without libqt3-compat-headers anyway. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/ksimus-floatingpoint/ksimus-floatingpoint_0.3.6-13.dsc Thanks, Barry deFreese --

Re: RFS: python-twitter

2008-02-13 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Mauro Lizaur, 13.02.2008] > On Feb 12, 2008 9:28 PM, Piotr Ożarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One more thing before I upload it: please clarify copyright holder > > issue - the one in sources and in debian/copyright doesn't match > > > Added the email of the author and Google as a copyright

Re: RFS: falconpl package (ITP:Bug#460591); source package

2008-02-13 Thread Giancarlo Niccolai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Wise wrote: > Feb 13, 2008 3:53 AM, Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The checks performed by Ubuntu maintainers have been quite >> extensive and deep, and the package should be ready as is; so, I >> am requesting a sponsor to for

Re: RFS: QA Upload -- ksimus-boolean

2008-02-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:58:20PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: > Here is a QA upload to fix the FTBFS and some other clean-up as usual. > I probably broke this by uploading ksimus without libqt3-compat-headers > anyway. > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/ksimus-boolean/ksimus-boo

RFS: lynis

2008-02-13 Thread Francisco García
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lynis". It is a very usefull system admin tool. * Package name: lynis Version : 1.0.8-1 Upstream Author : Michael Boelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.rootkit.nl/projects/lynis.html * License :

Re: RFS: failmalloc

2008-02-13 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:32:18 +0900 Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No you should not change orig.tar.gz, it should be exactly the same as > upstream provides (unless you have good reason to do so). Just delete > them in clean under same condition you use for copying them > from /usr/s

Re: RFS: falconpl package (ITP:Bug#460591); source package

2008-02-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Feb 14, 2008 4:28 AM, Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > License proliferation is bad, but it's a lesser evil with respect to > license fuzziness. > > FPL license is derived from Apache2. Among OSI accepted license, > Apache2 was the one covering exactly the needs of Falcon projec

[DONE] RFS: docbook-defguide (2.0.17+svn7549-2)

2008-02-13 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2008, 18:27 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/debian-xml-sgml/docbook-defguide_2.0.17+svn7549-2.dsc > http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/debian-xml-sgml/docbook-defguide_2.0.17+svn7549-2_i386.changes > Closes: http://b

Anonymous delayed queue?

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear mentors, There is a minor new upstream release for a package I maintain, but on the other hand the current build will enter testing tomorrow. I therefore tried a delayed upload, but as I am a DM, I have no access to gluck. Is there a possibility to make delayed uploads as a DM ? (Of course, i

Re: RFS: QA Upload -- ksimus-boolean

2008-02-13 Thread Barry deFreese
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:58:20PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: Here is a QA upload to fix the FTBFS and some other clean-up as usual. I probably broke this by uploading ksimus without libqt3-compat-headers anyway. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/ksim

Re: Anonymous delayed queue?

2008-02-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Feb 14, 2008 1:20 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a minor new upstream release for a package I maintain, but on > the other hand the current build will enter testing tomorrow. I > therefore tried a delayed upload, but as I am a DM, I have no access to > gluck. Is there

RFS: anyremote

2008-02-13 Thread Juan Angulo Moreno
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "anyremote". * Package name: anyremote Version : 4.2-1 Upstream Author : Mike Fedotov * URL : http://anyremote.sourceforge.net * License : GPL2+ Section : utils It builds these binary packages:

Re: Anonymous delayed queue?

2008-02-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 14/02/2008, Charles Plessy wrote: > If you or somebody else agree that it is of general interest (in > private if you want to limit the traffic on this list), I can > propose an update for the Developpers Reference. Isn't that just basic UNIX knowledge? -- Cyril Brulebois pgpw1gdAWeJOJ.pgp

DM uploads to experimental [Was: Re: Anonymous delayed queue?]

2008-02-13 Thread Y Giridhar Appaji Nag
On 08/02/14 13:20 +0900, Charles Plessy said ... > therefore tried a delayed upload, but as I am a DM, I have no access to > gluck. Is there a possibility to make delayed uploads as a DM ? > (Of course, it is not a big deal, but it helps to make the TODO list > shorter). On a related note, is it p

Re: Anonymous delayed queue?

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:32:28PM +0900, Paul Wise a écrit : > > $ at tomorrow > at> dupload /home/foo/*.changes Smart :) If you or somebody else agree that it is of general interest (in private if you want to limit the traffic on this list), I can propose an update for the Developpers Referenc

Re: DM uploads to experimental [Was: Re: Anonymous delayed queue?]

2008-02-13 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:31:28PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: >On a related note, is it possible to upload to experimental as a DM? Yes. >Would dak look at the Maintainers: or Uploaders: and DM-Upload-Allowed: >fields for the package in unstable? Yes. See http://wiki.debian.org/Maintai