On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:34:41 +0100
Jan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/08/2008 05:22 PM, JackTheDipper wrote :
> >> ./install-sh is also not licenced under the GPL(2+)...
> >>
> > to be honest, i looked at some other debian source packages (e.g.
> > nautilus and serpentine) and couldn'
Addressed the issues mentioned.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog".
>
> * Package name: gnomecatalog
> Version : 0.3.1-1.0
> That '.0' at the end isn't necessary.
Lintian notify a warning without it.
I
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog".
> >
> > * Package name: gnomecatalog
> > Version : 0.3.1-1.0
>
>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "azr3-jack".
* Package name: azr3-jack
Version : 1.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Lars Luthman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ll-plugins.nongnu.org/azr3/
* License : GPL
Section : sound
It builds t
JackTheDipper wrote:
> Holger Levsen wrote:
>
>> ./po/Makefile.in.in also looks problematic:
>> # Makefile for program source directory in GNU NLS utilities package.
>> # Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997 by Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> #
>> # This file file be copied and used freely witho
On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog".
> > >
> > > *
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:17:59 +0100
JackTheDipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JackTheDipper wrote:
> > Holger Levsen wrote:
> >
> >> ./po/Makefile.in.in also looks problematic:
> >> # Makefile for program source directory in GNU NLS utilities package.
> >> # Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997 by Ul
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:22:36 +0100
JackTheDipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ./src/Makefile.am says its some kind of public domain, while
> > debian/copyright
> > says the software is GPL2+... this is the case for many files like this in
> > your software. Being offline currently I cannot ea
El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 18:24 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno escribió:
> On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> > > > Dear mentors,
> > > >
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:14:50PM +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 18:24 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno escribió:
> > On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2
My mail, posted to this list on Jan 8, is ALSO lost...
The subject was "libcwd: one or two packages?".
The Message-ID was [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(I'm "replying" to a local CC now).
Can someone tell me what is going on? Why did both
posts that I mailed to this list not appear on the
list?
This is tires
On 09/01/2008, Carlo Wood wrote:
> My mail, posted to this list on Jan 8, is ALSO lost... The subject
> was "libcwd: one or two packages?". The Message-ID was
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm "replying" to a local CC now).
> Can someone tell me what is going on? Why did both posts that I mailed
> to this
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:56:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hopefully things will get better. Hard moderations rules are quite
> inconvenient anyway (like you have one or two questions to ask on a
> list, and have to temporary subscribe, instead of setting
> Reply-To/asking people to keep yo
Hallo! Du (Carlo Wood) hast geschrieben:
[ftr again: the outburst of spam yesterday happened accidently and
should be fixed now.]
> I still don't understand why my mail disappeared though, it
> doesn't contain anything NEAR spammy content.
i can't find anything containing your mailadress in our
On 09/01/2008, at 1.45, Charles Plessy wrote:
For the copyright files, you may be interested by the proposed
machine-parsable format described in the following link. Although no
parser has been written yet, it could be useful to start to use it:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
Le Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:58:09PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
>
> > - libbtk-core-dev should probably be in the libdevel section.
>
> Yes it could. Upstream defines the intended audience as "Developers,
> Science/Research". I assumed the package would appeal more to
> scientists than
Hi Cyril,
I have made the suggestions that you show me.
Thank You.
ps: I'm still needing a sponsor :(
On Wed Jan 09 08 02:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>On 09/01/2008, Joel Franco wrote:
>> I do not understand what means "serverstats or webissues in
>> lenny/sid". Where can i read about it?
>
>ap
Test.
On Wed Jan 09 08 02:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>On 09/01/2008, Joel Franco wrote:
>> I do not understand what means "serverstats or webissues in
>> lenny/sid". Where can i read about it?
>
>apt-get source one or the other, then look at debian/copyright.
>
>Cheers,
>
>--
>Cyril Brulebois
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:26:15PM +, Cord Beermann wrote:
> i can't find anything containing your mailadress in our dropboxes, so
> if it happens again, that mail from you doesn't go through to a list,
> check with the Listarchive and if it isn't there after two hours, send
> us a message:
>
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the upstream uses gettextize instead of glib_gettextize, you see
> this notice:
>
> # This file can be copied and used freely without restrictions. It can
> # be used in projects which are not available under the GNU General Public
> # License but wh
21 matches
Mail list logo
