On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:25:18 +
David Newgas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 13:14 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:46:11 +
> > David Newgas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Umm, I meant programming language: C, C++, Python, Perl, etc.
>
> Hehe.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scim-array". ITP: #452867
* Package name: scim-array
Version : 0.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Yu-Chun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://scimarray.openfoundry.org/index_en.html
* License : GPL
Section
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.7.1-1 of my package
"gcin".
It closes bug #419366, #420504, #436914.
It builds these binary packages:
gcin - a GTK+ based input method platform for Chinese users
gcin-qt3-immodule - a QT input method module with gcin as backe
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.7.1-1 of my package
"gcin".
It closes bug #419366, #420504, #436914.
It builds these binary packages:
gcin - a GTK+ based input method platform for Chinese users
gcin-qt3-immodule - a QT input method module with gcin as bac
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vttest".
The upload would close ITP: #254938
* Package name: vttest
Version : 2.7+20071216-1
Upstream Author : Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://invisible-island.net/vttest/
* License :
Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:02:58 +0100
David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Please don't upload it yet. I've just found out a minor issue during build:
> after svn-buildpackage the sources are left modified. Looking at it right now.
Ok, I can't solve this, thus asking for help.
Upst
Hi Wen,
* Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-03 17:53]:
[...]
> It builds a binary package:
> vttest - a program to test the compatibility of terminals
Compatible with what? Please fix the description.
From the website:
"In conformance of the good old hacker traditions, the only
do
Hi David,
Le jeudi 03 janvier 2008 à 19:22 +0100, David Paleino a écrit :
[...]
> ..
> $ svn status
> M src/GNOME_GThumb.h
> $
>
> This isn't, obviously, optimal: I'd expect a FTBFS if this package
> gets
> uploaded, and I wouldn't know how to fix it, since I'm not able right
> now.
>
Just
Il giorno Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:28:33 +0100
Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Hi David,
Hi Julien,
> Le jeudi 03 janvier 2008 à 19:22 +0100, David Paleino a écrit :
> [...]
> > ..
> > $ svn status
> > M src/GNOME_GThumb.h
> > $
> >
> > This isn't, obviously, optimal: I'd expec
Nico Golde wrote:
It builds a binary package:
vttest - a program to test the compatibility of terminals
Compatible with what? Please fix the description.
=
Its long description:
This is a program to test the compatibility (or to demonstrate the
non-compatibility) of so
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "keynav".
The upload would fix ITP: #431634
* Package name: keynav
Version : 20071031-1
Upstream Author : Jordan Sissel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.semicomplete.com/blog/projects/keynav/
* License
Hi Wen,
* Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-03 20:31]:
> Nico Golde wrote:
> >>It builds a binary package:
> >>vttest - a program to test the compatibility of terminals
> >Compatible with what? Please fix the description.
>
> =
> Its long description:
> This is a
Hi Ove,
(please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list)
Il giorno Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:27:55 +0100
Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> David Paleino skrev:
>
> > Upstream's tarball provides a file, src/GNOME_GThumb.h, which is dynamically
> > generated during the build. Now, it happens t
David Paleino skrev:
Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:02:58 +0100
David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
Please don't upload it yet. I've just found out a minor issue during build:
after svn-buildpackage the sources are left modified. Looking at it right now.
Ok, I can't solve this, thus a
David Paleino skrev:
I'm not recreating the tarball. The first times I was making packages, my
sponsors told me that the result of "debuild clean" (or fakeroot debian/rules
clean) had to be the same as the original tarball unpacked + debian/. Is this
wrong?
I'd qualify that somewhat. It's certa
16 matches
Mail list logo