Hi,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:08:54PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sunday 02 December 2007 13:19, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > Really, it may have sounded more rude to you, then it was meant to be.
> > But I was really annoyed by such a statement,
>
> That rather implies you were unfriendl
Hi,
Il giorno lun, 03/12/2007 alle 04.38 +0100, Leo "costela" Antunes ha
scritto:
> Francesco Namuri wrote:
> > I would like to know, what in your opinion is the best solution.
> > And then, I am mistaken thinking that the problem is related to the fact
> > that lib64/ is a symlink to lib/ ?
>
>
Hi,
Il giorno lun, 03/12/2007 alle 01.00 -0300, Felipe Sateler ha scritto:
> Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
>
> > could implement something like the widely used
> > AC_RELOCATABLE macro to his scripts, to make a '--disable-rpath' option
> > available at configure time.
>
> Is this really needed?
Dear Mentors;
Can someone point me to policy about file headers? I am currently
looking at a package with a GPL copyright file in the top directory,
and a terse statment "copyright X, released under the GPL" in most,
but not all files. I think the files without copyright are
non-essential, and c
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:08:54PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 02 December 2007 13:19, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > > > Thats bad. You should not answer to such questions if you don't know it
> > > > for your self! Thats especially true because of your DD status that
> > > > c
2007/12/2, Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1) Copyright / license issues: By removing important information from
> the previous packaging you might insult the packaging license.
> Redistribution in Debian might therefore be illegal.
While I do believe that, as a general rule, it's much
David Bremner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone point me to policy about file headers? I am currently
> looking at a package with a GPL copyright file in the top directory, and
> a terse statment "copyright X, released under the GPL" in most, but not
> all files. I think the files without
Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm thinking this because after the call of ./configure the generated
> libtool file contains all the lib variables set to corresponding lib64
> directory eg (after a call of ./configure):
Yeah, that's broken, don't do that. /usr/lib is the library
8 matches
Mail list logo
