RFS: tumgreyspf

2007-10-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tumgreyspf". This is a quite small package, that I believe would be fast to check. It's a quite efficient anti-spam tool doing both grey listing and SPF checks. We use it in production. * Package name: tumgreyspf Version : 1.2

Re: RFS: dictconv (2nd try) [1]

2007-10-09 Thread Paul Wise
On 10/9/07, Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dictconv/dictconv_0.2-1.dsc diff review: uneeded blank lines in debian/watch, debian/rules Homepage in description is obsolete, please move to the new dpkg field (in the source package stanza)

Re: sketch - New version

2007-10-09 Thread Daniel Baumann
David Bremner wrote: > I have upload a new version 0.2.27-2 of my package "sketch" to > mentors.debian.net. that won't work. you need 1:0.2.27-2 in order to be greater than 0.6.17-7 in stable. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Best way to move from .diff.gz patches to dpatch

2007-10-09 Thread Kartik Mistry
Dear all, I am maintaining packages of festival family (festival, -dev, -doc, speech-tools). I took maintainership sometime ago and fixed many bugs, but package has no patch system ie all patches resides in .diff.gz. Now, for better maintenance and making life easy for new upstream release, I wan

Re: RFS: dictconv (2nd try) [1]

2007-10-09 Thread Francesco Namuri
Hi, thanks for the review. :) Il giorno mar, 09/10/2007 alle 18.03 +1000, Paul Wise ha scritto: > On 10/9/07, Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dictconv/dictconv_0.2-1.dsc > > diff review: > > uneeded blank lines in debian/watch, debian/

Re: Best way to move from .diff.gz patches to dpatch

2007-10-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Kartik, > Now, for better maintenance and making life easy for new upstream > release, I want to move to dpatch. > > What are best way to do it? I have done manually with xosview (15 > patches scattered in .diff.gz and reading changelog carefully, putting > correct patch submitter from BTS -- a

Re: RFS: dictconv (2nd try) [1]

2007-10-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/10/2007): > Fixed this one also, so it's useless to use dch --closes? That's sure not needed for the ITP. For other bugs, that helps changelog readers to figure out which bug was fixed by which changelog entry w/o having to do any lookup using the BTS. Usua

Re: Best way to move from .diff.gz patches to dpatch

2007-10-09 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Hi > Now, for better maintenance and making life easy for new upstream > release, I want to move to dpatch. > > What are best way to do it? I have done manually with xosview (15 > patches scattered in .diff.gz and reading changelog carefully, putting > correct patch submitter from BTS -- all hail).

Re: RFS: dictconv (2nd try) [1]

2007-10-09 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:22:45 +0200 Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No need to put the full title of the ITP bug in debian/changelog > > Fixed this one also, so it's useless to use dch --closes? No, dch --closes is the recommended method for several reasons: 1. it looks up the bug

Re: sketch - New version

2007-10-09 Thread David Bremner
> "Daniel" == Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Bremner wrote: >> I have upload a new version 0.2.27-2 of my package "sketch" to >> mentors.debian.net. Daniel> that won't work. you need 1:0.2.27-2 in order to be Daniel> greater than 0.6.17-7 in stable. Ep

Re: ITR: gnomermind - failed review

2007-10-09 Thread Chess Griffin
Thank you for your review and reply, Neil. My comments to the bug reports were simply my initial contact with the original bug reporter, and were not my final assessment of the issues or the potential solutions. My impression was that part of the mentor-mentee relationship was a process of guidin

Re: Bug#444509: grig: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared

2007-10-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
tag 444509 patch thanks Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/09/2007): > Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, please find attached the patch for my NMU. Mentors, please someone checks and uploads grig with the attached debdiff, e.g. to DELAYED/5. I'm requesting it here since the IRC channel is qu

Re: Bug#444509: grig: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared

2007-10-09 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, > please find attached the patch for my NMU. autotools-dev contains a proper config.guess and config.sub, better copy them at build time and remove the files later (or make a backup of the original files and move them back), that's a much shorter and clearer patch then yours, also it will mak

Re: Bug#444509: grig: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared

2007-10-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/10/2007): > Hi, Hi. Thanks for not putting the subscribers in Cc unless they ask for it. > autotools-dev contains a proper config.guess and config.sub, better > copy them at build time and remove the files later (or make a backup > of the original files and

Re: Bug#444509: grig: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared

2007-10-09 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, > I could have stripped these parts from the diff, but they would be added > anyway, no, you can just remove them in your clean target. > so what's your point? Playing around with config.* backups is > what I call “ugly”. Then don't do it, see above. > And since the maintainer isn't using

Re: ITR: gnomermind - failed review

2007-10-09 Thread Bart Martens
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:54 -0400, Chess Griffin wrote: > My intent here was to help with a very old package and learn some > things along the way, Sure, go ahead. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR

[Sponsor found] Re: Bug#444509: grig: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared

2007-10-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/10/2007): > > I could have stripped these parts from the diff, but they would be > > added anyway, > > no, you can just remove them in your clean target. The point is exactly about adding them in the clean target, so that their being up-to-date is ensured dur

Re: [Sponsor found] Re: Bug#444509: grig: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared

2007-10-09 Thread Bas Wijnen
I didn't read the discussion before, but I think I know what it's about anyway, and I'd like to say something about it. :-) On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:51:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/10/2007): > > > I could have stripped these parts from the diff, but

Re: Best way to move from .diff.gz patches to dpatch

2007-10-09 Thread Margarita Manterola
On 10/9/07, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, for better maintenance and making life easy for new upstream > release, I want to move to dpatch. > > What are best way to do it? I have done manually with xosview (15 > patches scattered in .diff.gz and reading changelog carefully, putti

RFS: tesseract (updated package) 4th time lucky, I hope

2007-10-09 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.01-1 of "tesseract", plus the eight language packages, "tesseract-eng", "tesseract-deu", "tesseract-deu-f", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa", "tesseract-por", "tesseract-ita", "tesseract-fra" It builds these binary packages: tesseract

Re: [Sponsor found] Re: Bug#444509: grig: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared

2007-10-09 Thread Simon Ruggier
On 10/9/07, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exactly because they are handled in the clean target, from which you > propose to remove them. I might have troubles understanding your logic, > if any. You remove them in the clean target, and copy them back in a later target after the sour

[Uploaded] Re: sketch - New version

2007-10-09 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 03:25:22PM +0200, David Bremner wrote: > Epoch added, off-list suggestions of Bas incorporated. New version > 1:0.2-27-3 uploaded to mentors. It looked good, so I uploaded it. You should be getting some e-mail about it being NEW. If there are any problems, please let me k

RFS: qterm (updated package)

2007-10-09 Thread LI Daobing
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.4.0-6 of my package "qterm". It builds these binary packages: qterm - BBS client for X Window System written in Qt The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qterm - Sou

Re: RFS: dictconv (2nd try) [1]

2007-10-09 Thread Paul Wise
On 10/9/07, Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe it's useless to add a menu file? If your program isn't interactive, for eg gcc, nsis etc, then it probably shouldn't have a menu item. Unless the menu item runs some generic interactive program and passes the results to your pr

Unable to strip using dh_strip

2007-10-09 Thread varun_shrivastava
hi i am trying to build a package using debhelper scripts, but it gives an error message dh_installdirs -a dh_install -a dh_link -a dh_compress -a dh_strip -a dh_fixperms -a dh_makeshlibs -plibfreetype6 -V'libfreetype6 (>> 6.3.10)' dh_shlibdeps -a dh_installdeb -a /scratchbox/tools/bin/instal

Docbook XML manpages and bash-completion.

2007-10-09 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all, I wrote many Docbook XML manpages for command-line programs packaged for Debian-Med. I was just wondering if somebody knew a way to turn the OPTIONS section into something which can be used to enable bash completion ? Have a nice day ! -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wako