Hi there,
i packaged typo3-src and had to add an source-file for a font that is used
inside typo3. The file is a gzipped .sfd file and currently i handle this by
repackaging the orig.tar.gz (my former sponsor wanted this). But my
new sponsor thinks this should be added during package build. But
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du dimanche 19 août 2007, vers 12:06,
Christian Welzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> i packaged typo3-src and had to add an source-file for a font that is used
> inside typo3. The file is a gzipped .sfd file and currently i handle this by
> repackaging the orig
Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Pendant le temps de midi du dimanche 19 août 2007, vers 12:06,
> Christian Welzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > i packaged typo3-src and had to add an source-file for a font that is used
> > inside typo3. The file is a gzipped .sfd file and currently i handle
Am Sonntag, 19. August 2007 12:10 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
> To be able to include it in diff.gz, you need to encode it. You can use
But is it such a good idea to put a 120kb encoded file into the diff?
I believe i read somewhere this is not a good practise...
--
MfG, Christian Welzel
GPG-K
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyxplot".
* Package name: pyxplot
Version : 0.6.3.1-2
Upstream Author : Dominic Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pyxplot.org.uk/
* License : GPL (version 2 or later)
Section : math
It bu
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:26:21PM +0200, Christian Welzel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 19. August 2007 12:10 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
>
> > To be able to include it in diff.gz, you need to encode it. You can use
>
> But is it such a good idea to put a 120kb encoded file into the diff?
> I believe i read
Christian Welzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i packaged typo3-src and had to add an source-file for a font that
> is used inside typo3. The file is a gzipped .sfd file and currently
> i handle this by repackaging the orig.tar.gz (my former sponsor
> wanted this).
Is the ".sfd file" the source f
Am Sonntag, 19. August 2007 13:23 schrieb Ben Finney:
> Is the ".sfd file" the source form of the font -- that is, is that
> file the "preferred form of the work for making modifications to it",
> as the GPL would say? (I ask because I don't know what a ".sfd file"
> is.)
sfd is a format that can
On 8/16/07, Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 23:50 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multiget".
> >
> > * Package name: multiget
> > Version : 1.1.4-1
> > Upstream Author : liub
On 8/18/07, Li Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2007 17:05:34 schrieb LI Daobing:
>
>
>
> > Dear mentors,
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gviterm".
>
> > * Package name: gviterm
> > Version
On 8/18/07, Li Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Aug 17, 2:40 pm
> Subject: RFS: chmsee (updated package)
> To: linux.debian.devel.mentors
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:08:51PM +0800, LI Daobing wrot
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 05:14:45PM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote:
>
> > All together, now that I did about 10 pear extension Debian packages or
> > so, I am wondering if it was possible to create a script that would
> > parse the "package.xml" file to auto generate the debian/rules file the
> > cor
Am Sonntag, den 19.08.2007, 22:55 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing:
> On 8/16/07, Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 23:50 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multiget".
> > >
> > > * Package name
Hi all!
These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1]. Although it is
my first compiled package (the other was in Python), I'm not having any
technical problem. I have just a bunch of question for you about the
license. I don't know if you should write to debian-legal, or you can
help me
Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Hi all!
Hi
> These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1]. Although it is
> my first compiled package (the other was in Python), I'm not having any
> technical problem. I have just a bunch of question for you about the
> license. I don't know if you should w
Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>> This file is surely GPL and not in the public domain. Isn't illegal to
>> link GPL object code with other non-GPL object code and don't
>> distribute it as GPL? In other words, because of only this GPL file,
>> all the
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 07:06:13PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Hi all!
> These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1]. Although it is
> my first compiled package (the other was in Python), I'm not having any
> technical problem. I have just a bunch of question for you about the
>
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:20:19PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 19.08.2007, 22:55 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing:
> > On 8/16/07, Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 23:50 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing:
> > > > Dear mentors,
> > > >
> > > >
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:20:19PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 19.08.2007, 22:55 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing:
> > > On 8/16/07, Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 23:50 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing:
> > > > >
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Christian Welzel wrote:
> I think they also believe the above .sfd as the source of the font but the
> do not want to redistribute it, because they think nobody ever wants this
> file and it therefor would waste space in the tarball.
You mean that they're distributing whatever
On 15/08/07 at 00:12 +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libterm-ansicolor-ruby".
Hi,
Have you considered maintaining this package inside the pkg-ruby-extras
team? It would probably help a lot when looking for sponsors.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
On 8/20/07, Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 19.08.2007, 22:55 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing:
> > On 8/16/07, Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 23:50 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing:
> > > > Dear mentors,
> > > >
> > > > I am looki
Am Sonntag, 19. August 2007 21:28 schrieb Don Armstrong:
> You mean that they're distributing whatever is built from the sfd (ttf
> or whatever) in the tarball and not the sfd?
Exactly what i wanted to say, yes.
(one ttf, no sfd).
--
MfG, Christian Welzel
GPG-Key: http://www.camlann.de
Christian Welzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Sonntag, 19. August 2007 13:23 schrieb Ben Finney:
> > What, then, does upstream consider the source form of the work? Is
> > their distributed source form something that would be considered
> > free software?
>
> I think they also believe the abo
On 8/20/07, Giovanni Mascellani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1].
I'd suggest a -r option for md5sum would be a better thing to work on,
unless the GNU folks rejected it?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
It might be a good idea to include BLASSIC as a package.
The two BASICs in the catalog now seem abit dead. YaBasic is being
dropped by its developer. And BWBasic is open source but there is no
documentation, and apparently no forums.
Gandalf Parker
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Paul Wise wrote:
> On 8/20/07, Giovanni Mascellani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1].
>
> I'd suggest a -r option for md5sum would be a better thing to work on,
> unless the GNU folks rejected it?
Why even bother with th
27 matches
Mail list logo
