make or $(MAKE) ?

2007-04-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all, As one of the program I package was recently automakified, I had to change debian/rules to deal with this. While comparing with other packages, I realised that often $(MAKE) is used instead of make in debian/rules. In case of trivial packages which do not seem to expect something fancy f

Re: make or $(MAKE) ?

2007-04-07 Thread Florent Rougon
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As one of the program I package was recently automakified, I had to > change debian/rules to deal with this. While comparing with other > packages, I realised that often $(MAKE) is used instead of make in > debian/rules. In case of trivial packages which

Re: make or $(MAKE) ?

2007-04-07 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Saturday 07 April 2007 13:36, Charles Plessy wrote: > As one of the program I package was recently automakified, I had to > change debian/rules to deal with this. While comparing with other > packages, I realised that often $(MAKE) is used instead of make in > debian/rules. In case of trivial pa

Re: make or $(MAKE) ?

2007-04-07 Thread Székelyi Szabolcs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles Plessy wrote: > As one of the program I package was recently automakified, I had to > change debian/rules to deal with this. While comparing with other > packages, I realised that often $(MAKE) is used instead of make in > debian/rules. In case

Re: make or $(MAKE) ?

2007-04-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 02:01:28PM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs a écrit : > > To stay on the safe side, you should use $(MAKE); see > > http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#MAKE-Variable Thanks to everybody who answered. I have corrected my debian/rules file to use $(Make). Have a nice

hunting for Debian developer

2007-04-07 Thread zhenya . wei
Hi everyone, *Wanted* Linux Developer Linux developer wanted in Unique United Oy/Ltd. The project involves software development for Nokia Internet tablet (like Nokia 770 and Nokia 800) device. Programming competencies of interest: - Linux (Debian) programming - GTK - MAEMO platform - porting

Re: RFS: newlisp

2007-04-07 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Dmitry Chernyak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070406 07:06]: > newLISP community is looking for a sponsor for package "newlisp". > [...] > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/newlisp/newlisp_9.1.1-2.dsc > [...] > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Some problems (haven't loo

Re: RFS: newlisp

2007-04-07 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Scribit Bernhard R. Link dies 07/04/2007 hora 16:32: > - http://newlisp.org from debian/copyright is no URL without a / at > the end According to RFC 2396, a generic URI without a path component is a valid one (section 3). It is very uncommon, though. Uncommonly, Pierre -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open